OT - Possible Mass Shooting at Virginia Tech

Advertisement
National legalization of weed (and expungement of nonviolent drug offenses) would improve a lot of things tbh.
 
National legalization of weed (and expungement of nonviolent drug offenses) would improve a lot of things tbh.
 
61dEv70GeCL._AC_SY550_.jpg
 
Unfortunately, the industry pushes hyper THC product. Less THC, more CBD is the way to go.
 
Advertisement
Unfortunately, the industry pushes hyper THC product. Less THC, more CBD is the way to go.

"Initial clinical trials suggest that CBD is safe, well-tolerated and may have antipsychotic effects in patients with psychosis...Questions remain regarding the full side-effect profile of CBD...Given that CBD has antipsychotic effects without directly acting on dopamine receptors, it could represent a completely novel class of treatment for psychosis."
 
Advertisement
3 problems with that logic
- non-violent drug offenses are gateways to addiction and potential for violent offenses later, or destruction of property, theft, etc to feed the habit
- legalizing weed does little to change the underground drug trade. taxes are high so black market weed is still cheaper and pushed by dealers. regardless, weed will not impact violent crimes linked to cocaine, meth, fentanyl, heroin, etc
- bad people are bad people, no matter what laws you change. being lenient on criminals, especially repeat criminals, drives more criminal activity bc the rewards outweigh the risks.

Disclaimer - i am not against legalization of weed.
1) The gateway drug hypothesis is nonsense. Why aren't alcohol, tobacco, or prescriptions considered gateways, especially when someone starts young? Follow the money...

2) The war on drugs started because Nixon wanted to lock up black people and hippies. It turned a public health issue into a criminal issue, and we're living with the fallout today. After Portugal decriminalized all drugs in 2001, they saw a big increase in people seeking treatment and a big drop in drug-related deaths, among other benefits. What we're doing isn't actually addressing the problem.

3) Better policing and harsher sentences are different things. The likelihood of getting caught is a far more effective deterrent than a more severe punishment. And going harder on repeat offenders hasn't decreased the number of repeat offenders. Again, what we're doing isn't working unless you're a cop or you run a prison.
 
Advertisement
1) The gateway drug hypothesis is nonsense. Why aren't alcohol, tobacco, or prescriptions considered gateways, especially when someone starts young? Follow the money...

2) The war on drugs started because Nixon wanted to lock up black people and hippies. It turned a public health issue into a criminal issue, and we're living with the fallout today. After Portugal decriminalized all drugs in 2001, they saw a big increase in people seeking treatment and a big drop in drug-related deaths, among other benefits. What we're doing isn't actually addressing the problem.

3) Better policing and harsher sentences are different things. The likelihood of getting caught is a far more effective deterrent than a more severe punishment. And going harder on repeat offenders hasn't decreased the number of repeat offenders. Again, what we're doing isn't working unless you're a cop or you run a prison.

Complete disagree but i'm too tired to debate it because it will likely to little to nothing in changing your thoughts on it, even if i use specific examples from the lives of those in my family, group of friends, work, local area, etc.

Enjoy your day.
 
2) The war on drugs started because Nixon wanted to lock up black people and hippies. It turned a public health issue into a criminal issue, and we're living with the fallout today.

Before Niixon actually, see Harry Anslinger. The great Billie Holiday died handcuffed to a hospital bed because of that racist. The so called "War On Drugs" is nothing more than a jobs program for uneducated white men, period.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top