forums

OT: OVER 56.0

Advertisement
Belichick wants this to be a low scoring game. They will probably stick to the same game plan as KC and try to run the ball down their throats and keep that offense off the field.

I am not a betting man but if I were I would bet the under big time.
 
If anything, I like the Under. Line has dropped linearly from 58.

Rams now just +2 after +2.5 up until this morning. The line movement on this game is nearly identical to Seahawks/Broncos five years ago: Broncos were favored by -1, line shot up to -2.5 and then crashed down in Seattle's favor the day of the game. I think we may see this line move to Rams +1.5 by kickoff. Rams is the side.
 
Poptimus said:
If anything, I like the Under. Line has dropped linearly from 58.

Rams now just +2 after +2.5 up until this morning. The line movement on this game is nearly identical to Seahawks/Broncos five years ago: Broncos were favored by -1, line shot up to -2.5 and then crashed down in Seattle's favor the day of the game. I think we may see this line move to Rams +1.5 by kickoff. Rams is the side.
Click to expand...
Rams money line and the under parlay sound good to you ?
 
305407cane said:
Running the ball down the throats of Aaron Donald and suh?
Click to expand...

Look out for the Wham and Trap schemes to take advantage of their aggression upfield. Same kinda stuff that works against Diaz.

Rams run D was awful in the regular season but they've schemed well to fix it in the playoffs.
 
Advertisement
305407cane said:
Running the ball down the throats of Aaron Donald and suh?
Click to expand...
I don't care who it is. They will try and run the ball and keep their offense off the field.
They sure don't want this game to be a shootout like against the eagles. (We all saw what happened last Super Bowl.)

I do respect Wade Phillips and the Rams front 7 but hey, it is not like the '85 bears we are talking about here.
 
Colombie said:
Belichick wants this to be a low scoring game. They will probably stick to the same game plan as KC and try to run the ball down their throats and keep that offense off the field.

I am not a betting man but if I were I would bet the under big time.
Click to expand...
I lean this way as well
I would think belichick wants to muck this game up as well...and Rams aren’t as explosive w Gurly hurt and Cupp out
 
Colombie said:
I don't care who it is. They will try and run the ball and keep their offense off the field.
They sure don't want this game to be a shootout like against the eagles. (We all saw what happened last Super Bowl.)

I do respect Wade Phillips and the Rams front 7 but hey, it is not like the '85 bears we are talking about here.
Click to expand...
I get the feeling New England wants to attack that second level with some quick screens and short slants, pretty much their bread and butter, but with the Rams playing a 3-4 and the team's weakness being the linebackers of all units, it seems logical. I fully expect a ton of B.S. short crap to Edelman, Hogan, Gronk, White, Michel, etc. And they're the Patriots, so you know it's going to be executed with surgical precision and they'll dink and dunk their way down the field.

Fvck New England, I hope the Rams beat them in heartbreaking fashion like a missed FG off the upright as time expires.
 
Poptimus said:
I get the feeling New England wants to attack that second level with some quick screens and short slants, pretty much their bread and butter, but with the Rams playing a 3-4 and the team's weakness being the linebackers of all units, it seems logical. I fully expect a ton of B.S. short crap to Edelman, Hogan, Gronk, White, Michel, etc. And they're the Patriots, so you know it's going to be executed with surgical precision and they'll dink and dunk their way down the field.

Fvck New England, I hope the Rams beat them in heartbreaking fashion like a missed FG off the upright as time expires.
Click to expand...
My sportsbook is offering an Over/under on Gronkowski 54.5 receiving yards . Already placed a little on the over for that . What do you think ?
 
Dr.L.ThugU said:
My sportsbook is offering an Over/under on Gronkowski 54.5 receiving yards . Already placed a little on the over for that . What do you think ?
Click to expand...
I think you must have had massive juice, no? I'm seeing some Over 55.5 yards -155 on a site now. When did you submit it, I like it. Also, the O/U on Gronk catches is Over 3.5 -235, Under 3.5 +185, so clearly they're projecting at least 4 catches. You have to think he gets 55 yards on 4 catches.
 
Advertisement
Poptimus said:
I think you must have had massive juice, no? I'm seeing some Over 55.5 yards -155 on a site now. When did you submit it, I like it. Also, the O/U on Gronk catches is Over 3.5 -235, Under 3.5 +185, so clearly they're projecting at least 4 catches. You have to think he gets 55 yards on 4 catches.
Click to expand...
Placed it maybe an hour ago on intertops.eu

Any other specialty bets you see out there worth playing?


BTW you down for one of those draft threads this year ? Most of the participants over at canesport for that last one we had before they shut down the sports forum are here.
 
Dr.L.ThugU said:
Placed it maybe an hour ago on intertops.eu

Any other specialty bets you see out there worth playing?


BTW you down for one of those draft threads this year ? Most of the participants over at canesport for that last one we had before they shut down the sports forum are here.
Click to expand...
Over 3.5 total sacks in the game -130. I like it because it's somewhat of a hedge for Rams +2.5. Brady has the quickest release in the game, but if the Pats are winning, they'll be running the ball late. I think we see the equivalent of a sack per quarter. Both teams are known to blitz and have good defensive lines.
 
Back
Top