HarrietTubmanCane
Sophomore
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2015
- Messages
- 4,058
What’s that on Manny Diaz’s face?Lmao at calling someone racist, then posting this.
What’s that on Manny Diaz’s face?Lmao at calling someone racist, then posting this.
You can do what you want, but it’s an emotionally based conclusion and as long as you make personal attacks we will never get any where. You just shut down the debate every time.No I just get to the point, racist.
You can do what you want, but it’s an emotionally based conclusion and as long as you make personal attacks we will never get any where. You just shut down the debate every time.
What’s that on Manny Diaz’s face?
And your *new* definition of “racist” can be viewed as a personal attack and is definitely a dismissive barrier to dialogue.You can do what you want, but it’s an emotionally based conclusion and as long as you make personal attacks we will never get any where. You just shut down the debate every time.
Doesn’t mean you’re calling it correctly or through the eyes of the narrative you want to push.What can I say, I call like I see it, racist.
So you put him in what’s commonly referred to as “black face”?That’s a Frankenstein of bad Miami bad coaches: A mixture of Shannon, Golden, and for now, Diaz.
Or, it’s “offensive” if you’re a bored SJW looking for things to get outraged about.
Depends on your state of mind.
I believe it’s called “corch face”.So you put him in what’s commonly referred to as “black face”?
I’m pointing out an argumentative strategy as a logical fallacy. Quite different than a personal attack, but it seems as if you want me to accept your personal attack as truthful which then means we’re back going in circles.And your *new* definition of “racist” can be viewed as a personal attack and is definitely a dismissive barrier to dialogue.
That’s actually not true, in fact Alabama won the National Championship in 1964 and 1965 with all white teams, playing teams with predominate black rosters and defeating them, so that wasn’t the problem.Amazing how these kids go to these schools that just 50 years ago were still fighting to keep black players out of their teams....
Yeah Bear Bryant and Bama, looking at you, guy started recruiting black players because his teams started getting their *** kicked
Or footballRace/ethnicity and politics are the quickest ways to ensure something goes loco here.
That is what you call a double negative or a good ole fashioned hypocriteHow does somebody get to be BOTH a Trump hater AND a racist . . . ?
Politics aside, I nearly spit coffee on my screen.Go fvck yourself. Little bltch still with her. Mad cause conservatives don't wanna pay for your *** change......
This is a lie
When/where did I make a personal attack?I’m pointing out an argumentative strategy as a logical fallacy. Quite different than a personal attack, but it seems as if you want me to accept your personal attack as truthful which then means we’re back going in circles.
Well they made up the 1941 national title in the 80's to make up for it.That’s actually not true, in fact Alabama won the National Championship in 1964 and 1965 with all white teams, playing teams with predominate black rosters and defeating them, so that wasn’t the problem.
The problem was they went undefeated in 1966 too 3 years in a row, but were banned by the northern Polls from being ranked in the top 3 which kept them out of the National Championship. The northern polls did this because Bama didn’t have any black players.
Look up the lost ring 1966