forums

OT: BC vs Clemson

Advertisement
2 Timeouts burned on that 2pt conversion that ended up being a missed PAT

lmao the couches that would be burned if Manny did this lmao

/not defending manny
 
LuCane said:
You understand that "hold" call on the 2nd punt was questionable? Ignoring the history of well-timed calls in favor of whatever the ACC needs? Mirroring my ex-gf with all those repeated questions?
Click to expand...
Lol that was not questionable, you guys are getting too emotional. I was expecting it to be bs but on the replay he grabbed him and threw him to the ground.
 
***** rigged for tv ratings lmao and Clemson merch sales smdh unbelievable what football has become. No more old school canes because league wouldn't allow it.. I see why Bama and them constantly winning laughable..
 
Advertisement
chipcane said:
It was a hold - he threw the guy to the ground as he was rushing by. Questionable if you choose to overlook it, I suppose. Can't believe I'm defending ACC officiating.
Click to expand...
I could argue the guy was going forward on the "throw." Watch the lines and see **** like that on nearly every play. I appreciate a good contrarian (especially one who clicks on the site's Ads), but it's tough to ignore the ACC when you apply the "who benefits" question.
 
I know this is a Miami board but was anyone else ****ed when the acc refs stole the acc hoops championship from fsu when they played Duke when they had Zion??
 
Advertisement
Hurricane4lyfe said:
***** rigged for tv ratings lmao and Clemson merch sales smdh unbelievable what football has become. No more old school canes because league wouldn't allow it.. I see why Bama and them constantly winning laughable..
Click to expand...

Clemson is the Harlem Globetrotters of the ACC and the rest of the teams are the Washington Generals. The ACC is quite happy that all the other teams are around for comedy entertainment, but there is no need for competition.
 
Back
Top