OT: BC vs Clemson

Advertisement
On Defense, that is correct. He didn’t recruit our Offensive players.

He played a big part in the lack of development and/or talent at LB and CB. Yes we had Shaq and Pinkney for years, but Miami should always have depth and quality LBs ready to play immediately if one of those guys went down.
 
ETN been a net negative so far. Fumble at BC’s 3 yd line and bad drops.

Ball security is an issue for him and he’s lost himself some money today.
 
Yet people make excuses for the guys like scaife and Gaynor.. Very low expectations for those guys who have been here years, they dont move anybody

Scaife is a OT playing out of position. I can't explain why Miami has had so much trouble getting good interior linemen.
 
Advertisement
ETN been a net negative so far. Fumble at BC’s 3 yd line and bad drops.

Ball security is an issue for him and he’s lost himself some money today.
Ron Burgundy Anchorman GIF
 
Scaife is a OT playing out of position. I can't explain why Miami has had so much trouble getting good interior linemen.
exhibit #1.. Dude gets his **** pushed in, he plays oline he needs to step up as an upperclassmen, he aint some 6'7 olineman who cant get leverage, dude is undersized at tackle but under strength inside also? ******* move somebody or find someone who will
 
Any scenario where Notre Dump or Clumpson winning or losing affects us is predicated on us winning out.

can I get a show of hands of all those that thinks that’s happening?

The dream scenario is Clemson loses this week and gets worked by ND. Miami wins out. There is no comparison of scores against common opponents needed or tiebreakers, ACC championship would be Miami ND. But as the weeks have gone by, I've grown increasingly disappointed at the lack of execution and effort (despite the Ws) so I don't think Miami will win out.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top