- Joined
- Nov 9, 2025
- Messages
- 50
They have an eye test argument but if ND has an eye test argument then the team that handled them on the line of scrimmage and shut down their hyped RB and has NFL players all over the defense also has an eye test argument
They have an eye test argument but if ND has an eye test argument then the team that handled them on the line of scrimmage and shut down their hyped RB and has NFL players all over the defense also has an eye test argument
There is no eye test. ND ranks highly in a lot of the metrics the committee uses. Not saying they should or I agree. I’m just telling you they sit down and rank teams mostly off metrics and ND somehow has a good resume there. I don’t really get it either. I’d suggest following Adam McClintock on Twitter, he’s the best I’ve seen of deciphering what the committee is going to do. He claims no matter who the members are, they’re all consistent in how they rank because they’re all directed on how to do so.
He predicts the 25 each week and usually has the team either nailed or within a spot, maybe two.
So we need two more 150 yard defensive games and two more 40+ victories on the road?
wtf is game control? I mean any good team should have games controlled when your p4 opponents suck as badly as NDs.It wouldn’t hurt. Last week he had ND’s game control at 19.9 and Miami’s at 17.9.
ND has won 8 straight games by 10+ points, and 7 of those were by 20+.
Them beating Pitt last week hurt in a lot of ways because it gave them another quality win, they smoked them so their game control will go up, and also it’s unlikely Pitt ends up in the top 25 even if they beat GT and lose to us. It wouldn’t hurt if SMU or Louisville can win out and sneak into the bottom of the top 25 at the end of the year.
Are they using real metrics or arbitrary cutoff BS where teams that are functionally the same tier of team get treated differentlyThere is no eye test. ND ranks highly in a lot of the metrics the committee uses. Not saying they should or I agree. I’m just telling you they sit down and rank teams mostly off metrics and ND somehow has a good resume there. I don’t really get it either. I’d suggest following Adam McClintock on Twitter, he’s the best I’ve seen of deciphering what the committee is going to do. He claims no matter who the members are, they’re all consistent in how they rank because they’re all directed on how to do so.
He predicts the 25 each week and usually has the team either nailed or within a spot, maybe two.
wtf is game control? I mean any good team should have games controlled when your p4 opponents suck as badly as NDs.
Are they using real metrics or arbitrary cutoff BS where teams that are functionally the same tier of team get treated differently
They are supposed to have access to SportsSource Analytics and very fancy stats.