forums

New, slimmer numbers on the jerseys in 2025

rok said:
The numbers don't appear different to you people?

GwZ5MLqWsAAf2M9
Click to expand...
mad people GIF
 
Advertisement
Rellyrell said:
No, & like I said there’s no difference in the material or aesthetics. U can still see the seams distort the numbers.
Click to expand...
You're one of the people I was talking about. Agree completely that it's all the same with one exception: I see a larger "hole" inside the zero when comparing Wiley's jersey to the one Powell wore 2024.

Compare Toney's 10 with the one Barrow wore in 2024.



louisville-ky-miami-hurricanes-defensive-lineman-simeon-barrow-jr-rushes-on-defense-during.jpg


 
Notice how the number 1 on Toney's is shaped just a little differently than Barrow's
 
rok said:
The numbers were a bit too big in 2024. Not enough space between them.

In that Wiley photo it looks like the numbers are longer vertically and not as thicc

01j976mfkf1kms24j408.jpg
Click to expand...
rok said:
The numbers don't appear different to you people?

GwZ5MLqWsAAf2M9

12598968.jpg
Click to expand...
The number 3 on Borregales's jersey is shaped slightly differently than Wiley's
 
rok said:
The numbers don't appear different to you people?

GwZ5MLqWsAAf2M9

12598968.jpg
Click to expand...

Brother, there is nothing different, & choosing a close up photo vs. an afar photo is going to distort the perception. It’s the same material, the same design, & u can still see the seams distorting the numbers.

So let me provide u w the up close photos, u tell us what’s changed:


IMG_2916.png
IMG_2917.jpeg
IMG_2925.jpeg
IMG_2922.jpeg
IMG_2918.jpeg
IMG_2923.jpeg
 
Rellyrell said:
Brother, there is nothing different, & choosing a close up photo vs. an afar photo is going to distort the perception. It’s the same material, the same design, & u can still see the seams distorting the numbers.

So let me provide u w the up close photos, u tell us what’s changed:


View attachment 330772View attachment 330773View attachment 330775View attachment 330776View attachment 330777View attachment 330778
Click to expand...
You’re mostly right but I think they did stretch out the base of the “1” but didn’t do so for other numbers with a base for some odd reason. That’s what it looks like in the video game at least.
 
n0rcalcane said:
You’re mostly right but I think they did stretch out the base of the “1” but didn’t do so for other numbers with a base for some odd reason. That’s what it looks like in the video game at least.
Click to expand...

So let me explain what “new” means…lol.

That would indicate new material, new template, new color change, etc. If they slightly adjusted the font on “a” #, that wouldn’t constitute “new.”

UL received new uniforms
IMG_2927.jpeg


ASU received new uniforms:
IMG_2928.jpeg


UW received new uniforms:
IMG_2929.jpeg


These are in total re-designs, template changes. There’s nothing “new” about our jerseys.
 
Advertisement
Rellyrell said:
So let me explain what “new” means…lol.

That would indicate new material, new template, new color change, etc. If they slightly adjusted the font on “a” #, that wouldn’t constitute “new.”

UL received new uniforms
View attachment 330782

ASU received new uniforms:
View attachment 330783

UW received new uniforms:
View attachment 330784

These are in total re-designs, template changes. There’s nothing “new” about our jerseys.
Click to expand...
Nah that’s why I was saying you’re mostly right. I just saw another poor design choice by adidas and wanted to take another dig at them.

They made one number look different than all the others. Why?
 
n0rcalcane said:
Nah that’s why I was saying you’re mostly right. I just saw another poor design choice by adidas and wanted to take another dig at them.

They made one number look different than all the others. Why?
Click to expand...

Yeah; when I saw the thread “new uniforms”, I was like…Ooooooook?? Lol. Making “a” font change on one number is bushleague. Lol. But, in no way did we receive a new uniform. However, still way better than those older jawns we had. Really interested to see what merch we’ll be provided this time around.
 
The classic uniforms adidas has given us since 2016 are far better than anything Nike did since the mid 2000s.

Add on that we’re the flagship adidas school and they’ve been a great partner in NIL and there’s no reason to switch
 
stormsurge13 said:
The classic uniforms adidas has given us since 2016 are far better than anything Nike did since the mid 2000s.

Add on that we’re the flagship adidas school and they’ve been a great partner in NIL and there’s no reason to switch
Click to expand...
we are not their flagship school.

richt did the uniform change not Adidas.

please switch to nike soon
 
Advertisement
stormsurge13 said:
The classic uniforms adidas has given us since 2016 are far better than anything Nike did since the mid 2000s.

Add on that we’re the flagship adidas school and they’ve been a great partner in NIL and there’s no reason to switch
Click to expand...

1. We’re not the flagship as was seen by UL’s contract

2. Richt is the one who called for a uniform re-design b/c he thought Adidas’ concepts were awful

3. In what way has their NIL benefited us or any other Adidas branded schools? Who have we gotten that are known Adidas NIL athletes?
 
rok said:
You're one of the people I was talking about. Agree completely that it's all the same with one exception: I see a larger "hole" inside the zero when comparing Wiley's jersey to the one Powell wore 2024.

Compare Toney's 10 with the one Barrow wore in 2024.



louisville-ky-miami-hurricanes-defensive-lineman-simeon-barrow-jr-rushes-on-defense-during.jpg


Click to expand...

QP knows holes and is right
 
Back
Top