ND preview (long analysis)

HighSeas

Sophomore
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
4,827
I think this is the 1st thread I've posted here but it's time. I re-watched ND's games against Georgia & USC and made notes on what I saw and how it relates to tomorrow's matchup.

ND Offense vs. Miami Defense

The ND offense is a very standard vanilla spread option attack. Their foundation is zone read and read option with puller(s) (power, G-lead). They run the occasional inverted veer play but not nearly as often as VT. In the USC game they incorporated jet motion but beyond that they do very little in terms of window dressing, variable formations, and constraints. UGA totally shut down their run game but USC played with poor energy, effort and discipline so they got trampled all game.

When they are forced to throw in long-yardage situations they run isolation routes, typically verticals or crossers. They will try a designed vertical shot play a few times a game where they give a hard play fake and pull a lineman for the protection scheme. They also try a lot of screen plays, mostly to the back, but these are typically poor in design and execution making them easy to diagnose and defend.

  • Wimbush has erratic footwork and mechanics in the pocket, doesn't change ball speeds and has poor ball security as a runner and passer. Think of him as a combination of the worst qualities of Robert Marve and Stephen Morris.
  • Adams the RB is an upright runner with minimal elusiveness and burst but he can find the hole and has above-average power and long speed for a college back. Give him a runway and he is effective, but he struggles at creating yards for himself at or behind the line. He's very exploitable in pass protection.
  • Their OL is arguably the best in the nation. They move well in space, play fundamentally sound with footwork and hand use, and execute assignments consistently. They are not powerful finishers or overwhelming physical specimens. The LT 68 gave up a game-sealing stripsack to UGA.
  • Not much to be said about their receiver group. Wimbush is such a poor passer and the scheme is so bland that they rarely have opportunities to impact the game

The front 4 is the key for Miami which is a great sign. Gap integrity is still important but not as essential as it was for the VT game. The discipline we saw last week bodes well for this matchup. With that being said, ND thrives on poor tackling so we can't afford a repeat of the UNC performance. Nothing about ND's passing game concerns me and I expect to see a heavy dose of 8-man fronts. Edge blitzes are the surest way to generate pressure if Adams is isolated on an LB or safety. Finally, if ND arrives in the red zone I expect the defense to clamp down on their run game and force a FG.

Miami Offense vs. ND Defense

The ND defense is a solid but unimposing unit. Some posters on this board have underrated their defense this week but they're certainly nothing to fear. Against UGA they played mostly 2-man press coverage and mixed in some Quarters coverage. Against USC they showed a completely different gameplan with big cushions and off-man coverage, and when they took a big lead they went into a permanent zone shell like Golden did when he was shook against FSU and the like. They have decent team speed, play physical and rally to the ball. Their design is obviously to be a bend but don't break unit that capitalizes on impatient offenses.

  • Their DL is very physical with heavy hands to stack the line. They rarely penetrate on run downs, instead they engage with their hands and look for the ball. On pass downs they have no pass rush plan and rarely try any line games. They just tstay in their rush lanes and push the pocket. Think of them as a Jethro Franklin unit that's stronger at the point of attack.
  • Their LBs are solid. #23 is athletic and a good cover guy in zone or man. He has range to play sideline to sideline and is quick out of his pedal. #5 and #4 are tone-setters that aggressively defend the run. I don't recall seeing any blitzes with this group but they might mug the line before dropping out.
  • Their corners are likewise solid from what I can tell, but that could be because they always have safety help so they're able to play press, turn and run. When they provide big cushions they don't have the quickness to close on a quick curl route.
  • I think the safeties are the weak link of the defense. When they were in quarters they gave up a deep ball to UGA where they didn't get enough depth or communicate the post.

This is a workable matchup for the Miami offense. Richt loves that power sweep play with Homer and the ND front doesn't penetrate so that play could work well. It will be tough to generate enough movement to grind yards with inside zone runs. A numbers advantage may be required to have success running the ball. Jet motion, read option, pullers, and a good passing game can all help that cause. The RPO is also in play given that ND prefers big cushions. Even when the outside corners are in press the slot corners play far off.

The passing game will have to focus on specific matchups. When ND is in 2-man the best matchup is Berrios in the slot. Herndon vs. 23 on ND is advantage ND. The outside WRs like Richards and Thomas will feel the brunt of the safety help but a well-thrown vertical up the sideline could work. The best bet for consistent yards against 2-man is Rosier's legs because the LBs get a lot of depth and leave the middle of field empty for the QB to scramble.

When ND plays in their soft zone shell the offense could really shine. ND likes to spot-drop and doesn't collision or reroute receivers. This creates easy access for inside breaking routes and Richt loves his slants. Herndon for the post or stick route, Berrios and Richards on slants, Langham on the slant or deep dig. Everything is fair game against that coverage as long as Rosier doesn't force the ball into traffic. There won't be much of a pass rush to force him to speed up his process anyway.

If ND shows Quarters that's the golden opportunity to take the deep shot to Thomas. Also random observation: their punt returner #10 is painfully slow.

Final thoughts:


This is a prime matchup to make another big statement. We know the players are focused and the fans will deliver. ND should have difficulty moving the ball and finishing drives. If Miami comes out sloppy and has to play from behind that is not a death knell because Wimbush can give the turnover chain some action and the conservative ND zone defense is easier to pick apart than the defenses faced in similar comebacks vs. GT and FSU. Every scenario I envision leads to a Miami win. A mentally strong team like the one we've seen all year wouldn't just lay an egg either. Finally, from a gambling perspective this is a great spot for Miami as 3-pt home underdogs getting about 25% of the bets.


Prediction: 30-13 Miami
 
Advertisement
Good stuff, I hope your breakdown is correct.
I was on a ND site and reading their take and not surprisingly most had ND winning by at least 13, save for one guy at 3. The most interesting part is it was alluded to that Rosier is good for a pick or two? Made me think they didn't watch much but the VT game. Also said they'll be able to wear down Miami's defense with the relentless ground game, an interesting take considering our defensive substitutions.
Overall they felt Rosier was the weak link and that Miami would not be able to score and ND would put up at least 30.

While you hate to put too much on one game because our goals are still there even with a loss, I'm not overestimating when I say at least 80% of the pundits are picking ND, so we could get a serious boost with a win.
 
Last edited:
Not overly concerned about ND's defense as much as their offense. It will be interesting to see how they handle the RPO. This is a game where Rosier's going to have to be accurate and not go for the big shot all of the time.
 
THE unit I’m worried about most is the UM offense. Not ND’s defense or offense. If our offense is consistent and keeps this moving instead of having some of those first half stalls from earlier in the season then we win
 
Advertisement
My concerns is ND O-line vs D-line (can't let them try and overwhelm us), Our O-line vs ND D-line (ND D-line wasn't good last year but u wouldn't have known that watching the game - we have a new O-line though), Rosier (decision making, accuracy, and limiting turnovers Ints or fumbles.), QB runs (that QB can house it), and making the initial tackle (they have a lot of yards after contact).
 
Last edited:
My concerns is ND O-line vs D-line (can't let them try and overwhelm us), Our O-line vs ND D-line (ND D-line wasn't good last year but u wouldn't have known that watching the game - we have a new O-line though), Rosier (decision making, accuracy, and limiting turnovers Ints or fumbles.), QB runs (that QB can house it), and making the initial tackle (they have a lot of yards after contact).

Agreed on our O-line. Notre Dame doesn't have the luxury of launching Linder into Kaaya's lap every other play. Gauthier actually has a set of balls.
 
THE unit I’m worried about most is the UM offense. Not ND’s defense or offense. If our offense is consistent and keeps this moving instead of having some of those first half stalls from earlier in the season then we win

Richt is right that the OL can't impose its will yet, but that doesn't mean that the O can't be effective. Don't have to blow ND off the line.
1) Dallas has great hands, use the back as a receiver. No need to run into brick walls. A 4 yard pass is as good as a four yard run.
2) I've been saying it for the last three games - use Dallas in the Wildcat 5-6 times, bring in 2 extra blockers, and get numbers on the line. Dallas can be especially helpful on the goal line.
 
My concerns is ND O-line vs D-line (can't let them try and overwhelm us), Our O-line vs ND D-line (ND D-line wasn't good last year but u wouldn't have known that watching the game - we have a new O-line though), Rosier (decision making, accuracy, and limiting turnovers Ints or fumbles.), QB runs (that QB can house it), and making the initial tackle (they have a lot of yards after contact).

Agreed on our O-line. Notre Dame doesn't have the luxury of launching Linder into Kaaya's lap every other play. Gauthier actually has a set of balls.

This.
- KC at tackle and is probably our best performer on the OL.
- Linda isn't here to be ND's b*tch
- ND DL Jones who wrecked the game last year isn't there anymore.
- Gauthier doesn't typically get overwhelmed and FSU has better DT.
- Our run offense suddenly improved when big Don started.
- If we play the same scheme we played last game to take away VT running game (which was 4-2-5) we should be good in good shape.
 
Great post. Thanks

I'm very concerned about the Miami LBs' decision making against the run. It hasn't been very good so far this season. The Notre Dame OL will produce running lanes at the LOI. The LBs have to fill. Not optimistic.
 
Advertisement
My concerns is ND O-line vs D-line (can't let them try and overwhelm us), Our O-line vs ND D-line (ND D-line wasn't good last year but u wouldn't have known that watching the game - we have a new O-line though), Rosier (decision making, accuracy, and limiting turnovers Ints or fumbles.), QB runs (that QB can house it), and making the initial tackle (they have a lot of yards after contact).

Agreed on our O-line. Notre Dame doesn't have the luxury of launching Linder into Kaaya's lap every other play. Gauthier actually has a set of balls.

This.
- KC at tackle and is probably our best performer on the OL.
- Linda isn't here to be ND's b*tch
- ND DL Jones who wrecked the game last year isn't there anymore.
- Gauthier doesn't typically get overwhelmed and FSU has better DT.
- Our run offense suddenly improved when big Don started.
- If we play the same scheme we played last game to take away VT running game (which was 4-2-5) we should be good in good shape.

Um.....not sure you want to go with a 4-2-5.....Wake played a version of that (I know MIAMI isn't Wake) but they still ran up over 700 yards of offense....without Adams the entire game or Wimbush in the 4th.


Play ND close up front and play gap conscious. don't worry about penetrating as much as plugging up the holes. and play zone against the receivers. Force them to find the open spots. put your most athletic LB on Wimbush the entire game. You'll need someone on him. He'd rather pass believe it or not, but he obviously isn't afraid to run and he is very dangerous when he takes off. 14 TD's and 700 yards, about 28 TD's and 1500 total yards responsible for, and that's missing an entire game (UNC).
 
Given how our D has played this year, I would not be surprised, despite the crowd, to see our D get gashed a bit early, giving up a couple scores, but then they clamp it down, esp in 2H, and our O gets it done.

Hopefully they dominate both sides from get go.
 
Given how our D has played this year, I would not be surprised, despite the crowd, to see our D get gashed a bit early, giving up a couple scores, but then they clamp it down, esp in 2H, and our O gets it done.

Hopefully they dominate both sides from get go.

ND does more damage in the second half from a physical standpoint. You'll need to go in to the second half with a lead.
 
Back
Top