Most here are so easy to troll

And for those of you that don’t like seeing this on a message board because it’ll hurt recruiting, that’s some real SEC SEC SEC shît. The safety of kids has to come first.

If this is what’s going on then we have far more pervasive issues than onfield corching and off field recruiting. If this is the situation, they need to eradicate the entire AD and hire responsible adults... who hire other responsible adults.

This shît is disgusting.


Do you really believe that story? You believe a Miami Hurricanes S & C coach pulled a gun on a player and it was swept under a rug, with no one finding out about it or it being leaked all over social media?

I honestly have no clue. Just curios if you believe something like that actually occurred.
 
Advertisement
Why were guns pulled on the guy? And 5 different times at that? He's the common denominator in every situation. Maybe buddy got some serious behavior issues going
You’re missing the institutional issue.

Why was there no investigation?

You reportedly have a coach pulling a gun on a player and players pulling guns on players.
 
Do you really believe that story? You believe a Miami Hurricanes S & C coach pulled a gun on a player and it was swept under a rug, with no one finding out about it or it being leaked all over social media?

I honestly have no clue. Just curios if you believe something like that actually occurred.

I think Dee is a significant, higher profile former player with significant ties to the school. I think he’s stating what he’s at least been told by a player or players.
 
Why would he divulge that kind of sensitive information, that he's going to fire his OC, while his OC is literally preaching continuity to their prized QB recruit?

Especially knowing his uncle has a propensity to go off on social media.

Said he was making changes in approach to offense, possibly. Tell a 19 year old kid he's firing someone after a bowl game, highly doubtful imo.
Enos likely already knows. There are plenty of times people under contract and high level employees will know of the end before it happens. Not always, but often. That's why they have contracts, to define expectations. Not everyone gets walked out by security carrying a box.
 
I was about to say if that **** did happen maybe it's on the common denominator individual that it keeps happening to.
I agree that’s a real problem. My concern is that there was no investigation not who to blame for the start of hostilities.
 
Advertisement
There's a difference between someone brandishing a gun and pointing it at you. Had someone pointed a gun, it would be a much bigger deal.
 
Trying to understand what you're saying about all the time. You think HCs are telling recruits the coach they currently have on staff, the one they'll supposedly report to if they sign, is going to be fired after the bowl game or NSD?

Yes coaches tell recruits that there will be scheme and personnel changes as they recruit them. It may not always be that players position coach being replaced. Recruits are told about changes that are happening.
 
There's a difference between someone brandishing a gun and pointing it at you. Had someone pointed a gun, it would be a much bigger deal.
He didn’t specify if the guns on the 5 occasions were brandished or pointed. I believe brandishing is a misdemeanor crime.
 
Anyone who reads this from Dee and doesn’t get it... will never get it when it comes to Dee and the distinction between the love of an institution and the refusal to follow a dysfunctional staph like “sheep” per the OP. Dee’s words:

“Speaking on one kid. Since hes came here he’s had a gun pulled on him 5 times all on campus. 2 times by teammates,2 times at a party & 1 time by a coach... He’s been in 2 fights with staff members 1 time by his position coach and one time s & c. He gets death threats through text messages and all his social media on a regular basis.

Social media is the devil you may say & theres not much that can be done. Well normal procedure when you notify staff of these things is a investigation is done & precautions are taken to ensure kids safety... Well with this staph none of that occurs. It's on the kid solely and that's happened with quite a few kids here now.

I do more for this university than yall will ever know and I'm proud to be in the position where I can give back in anyway to the university that entitled me to live my best life for generations to come. But because I love my university doesnt mean I have to love this staph or any other. You need to earn that respect. So while people like you judge people you know nothing about and speak on what anyone tells kids, you should realize theirs two sides to every coin & usually the one you see is only a glimpse of reality.

The staph here is flat out toxic & I'm never gonna support that. Some good people but a rotten core.”

This **** is funny, no way we are recruiting dudes with big enough nuts to pull a gun on someone let alone a teammate lol at least the play on the field ain’t portraying that type of **** 😂
 
Why were guns pulled on the guy? And 5 different times at that? You spinned it like he's the victim but yet he's the common denominator in every situation. Maybe buddy got some serious behavior issues going
Exactly. The chances of someone getting a gun pulled on them 5 times in less than a four year period are slim to none unless he is a seriously bad guy who is into a lot of ****.
 
Advertisement
Cuz the story is bull****?
5 times is what gets me. It’s not like one instance but he’s saying multiple instances. If Dee is knowingly telling a fake story about 5 instances of guns being pulled then that would be highly disappointing and irresponsible on his part.
 
Why were guns pulled on the guy? And 5 different times at that? You spinned it like he's the victim but yet he's the common denominator in every situation. Maybe buddy got some serious behavior issues going
Now you went and edited and changed the post I responded to by adding in that “I spinned it.”

I didn’t spin anything. If the dude got a gun pulled on him 5 times he’s probably the common denominator. That’s not so much the issue for me as is that there should have been an investigation. The lack of an investigation is the macro institutional problem.
 
He didn’t specify if the guns on the 5 occasions were brandished or pointed. I believe brandishing is a misdemeanor crime.
Exactly. That's my point. If someone brandished, even in a threatening manner, it's significantly less of an issue than pointing it at someone's head. In either case, in casual conversation someone would say they had a gun pulled on them.

I'm not minimizing the gravity of the situation, just pointing out the different levels of aggression.
 
Back
Top