The safety was an all time bad call. for picking the ball up initially I did think he was down. He was legit laying on the ball, no one could see it. Wasnt until he stood up and picked up the ball people figured out what was going on. The football gods also made it right on the next play AND watching the replay #7 and I think 11 for Clemson had a beat on JW20. I think he gets tackled inside the 20 so calling him down in the endzone benefits us.The call that still blows my mind is the non safety. I don’t understand why the field judge marked him at 1. It was the field judge that was behind Klubnik. There is no way he saw where the ball was. So he just randomly blows whistle as if he doesn’t understand the player was running backwards. None of it including the review made any sense. Mario better be lighting someone up this week. It screams of a fix being in When you take points off the board like that.
The refs were lost in the sauce. Who knows what they saw.Since they weren’t reviewing the possession of the ball, why would it go to replay. Really wasn’t a reason to review it
He was being tackled at the ten if refs let it go.It was stupid, but no way Williams returns it 100 yards as Hassleback insinuated.
Problem with that philosophy is the GT game fumble. Runner is down, official 2 feet away with a perfectly unobstructed view lets it play out just in case. Now the call on the field is fumble and you need irrefutable evidence it isn’t. One person standing in the wrong spot can prevent the needed camera angle and now a non fumble is a fumble.Because too many refs reflexively blow their whistles when they are not sure what is happening.
I frankly think they should do exactly the opposite. Do not blow your whistle unless you know for certain a play should be stopped. The whistle should not be the default reaction.
It shouldn't have gone into OT, but Emory's confidence and Flagg's reputation are glad it did.I want our 2 points.
no, and there never will be one...if they do respond, they will have the refs backs, you know thisAny official response about the safety yet?
Great point and fair correction from my statement.Problem with that philosophy is the GT game fumble. Runner is down, official 2 feet away with a perfectly unobstructed view lets it play out just in case. Now the call on the field is fumble and you need irrefutable evidence it isn’t. One person standing in the wrong spot can prevent the needed camera angle and now a non fumble is a fumble.
The problem was NOT blowing the whistle in the GT game when Don was clearly down and then blowing (pause) it in the Clemson game after the Shipley fumble when nobody knew where the ball was.Problem with that philosophy is the GT game fumble. Runner is down, official 2 feet away with a perfectly unobstructed view lets it play out just in case. Now the call on the field is fumble and you need irrefutable evidence it isn’t. One person standing in the wrong spot can prevent the needed camera angle and now a non fumble is a fumble.