Was just about to post this same exact thing. I've never understood the QB matchup analysis. QBs literally never face off. I feel analysis should typically be (with some flexibility depending on matchups):
- QB/WR/TE vs CB/S
- OL vs DL/LB
- RB/TE vs LB/S
- OC vs DC
Agree completely.
Bullet 1 - QB/WR/TE vs. CB/S - While I acknowledge that our pass-catchers have something to prove/establish this year, I do believe that Beck's ability to carve up the DB groups all over the SEC give him a major advantage. That is not to say that Notre Dame is "bad" in the defensive backfield. On the contrary, they can be as good as they wanna be, but Beck has been-there/done-that and I think he can beat almost any defensive backfield in the country. Our WRs and TEs just need to be able to hold onto his dimes. On the other hand, I think that a freshman QB like Carr might struggle against even the 2024 Miami DBs (see, generally, Heisman candidate DJ Lagway), but we are no longer burdened by the 2024 DBs, we now have the new-and-improved version. Summed up, I think Miami has the QB/WR/TE edge on offense, and the CB/S edge on defense.
Bullet 2 - OL vs. DL/LB - This comparison is a much closer call. I'm not going to get into a lengthy analysis of player vs. player, particularly when there may be some adjustments as to how the defense is schemed and play-called, perhaps minor (ND has a new DC, but Freeman is still there) or major (Hetherman vs. Guidry). I give a moderate edge to the Miami OLs over the ND DL/LB corps, and I probably give a narrow edge to the Notre Dame OL over Miami's DL/LB group, almost exclusively based on the mystery of what our LBs will now become under Hetherman. And I would have been willing to give ND a bigger edge, but isn't one of their OLs out for this game?
Bullet 3 - RB/TE vs. LB/S - This one (in my opinion) encompasses the OL too. For instance, I could see where ND might think "hey, Love is as good as Fletcher/Lyle", and maybe that could be true in a vacuum. But the way that Miami's OL opened up the run last year, and the way that our TEs are probably more oriented towards blocking and the "surprise" receptions, I think Miami will have more VARIETY in the running attack against ND's LBs and Safeties. Having said that, Love is a very good running back who Miami MUST get wrapped up quickly, or else he can do some damage. And while I do not discount the OTHER running backs for ND, they are (by comparison) more unproven than Love. I do feel good about Miami's safeties, and I will be as curious as anyone else to see where our LBs come in on the "potential vs. actual" scale. I give Miami the RB/TE edge over the ND LB/S group, and I give a very small edge to the ND RB/TE over the Miami LB/S group, though Miami's DL could impact the ND RB even more than is mentioned in this paragraph. If this was strictly a "passing" situation, I give Miami's RB/TE group a bigger edge because Beck really knows how to use those weapons, and I make it a toss-up between the ND RB/TE and the Miami LB/S because I don't feel that Carr will be able to use passes to the RB/TE quite as well as Beck does.
Bullet 4 - OC vs. DC - Before we really analyze anything, it must be pointed out that Miami had the #1 offense in the country last year. Clearly, not all of that is due to some PhD level playbook from Dawson, but is more due to him empowering Cam Ward (and now Carson Beck) to use what they see to modify playcalls without having to "look at me" for 20 seconds prior to snapping the ball. And while ND has a "new" DC (though Freeman's fingerprints are on everything), I have to give the Miami OC the edge over the Notre Dame DC. In the other direction, while I could give ND's Denbrock the edge over Miami's newbie Hetherman, I feel that the inexperience of Carr is going to limit what Denbrock can call, thus blunting some/most of his OC advantages. And let's not forget that Hetherman was a DC in the Big 10. So this is an area where it's probably more of a toss-up than it should be, all other things being equal.