Shooter McGavin
I Eat Pieces Of Sh*t Like You For Breakfast
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2015
- Messages
- 26,796
Nah not this timeAre hookers also accepted?
Nah not this timeAre hookers also accepted?
You asked two questions:Its obsessive to want to know if our top rated recruit is practicing? Lmao y'all the ones actually trippin. Zero rights to know.... And if the media actually reported it would you consider that a violation? I'd consider it good reporting ...Donating to NIL gives you zero rights to know this kind of information. It’s weird to be so obsessive about it.
Yes and just to add to that, their actual personal life especially if nothing illegal, I am not saying is what matters. Their ON-FIELD impacts are the information I think should be shared. Its been incredibly vague. We literally have no idea if he is even practicing or not. Is he currently even with the team? Like all we know is he wasn't at the spring game I guess... Is he on campus? Was him not participating the teams/coaches decision or his? **** like that specifically regarding the team and his performance should absolutely be reported on. People saying that should be private imo are truly trippin. I haven't been saying I want to know the intimate details of what he actually did off the field (as long as legal) at is putting him in the doghouse. I think knowing what being in the doghouse entails or what his on field/performance did to put him in the doghouse IS relevant though.I’m not taking a position in this “right to know” vs “keep it private” argument, however,
As a friend of mine who used to be a judge loved to say from the bench, “counselor, let me change the facts a bit and tell me if this changes your argument”.
If Lowe was in the NFL, would you feel you have a ‘right to know’? The usual refrain to that question has been, well there is a difference between a pro and college athlete. But NIL has not just blurred that line but has obliterated that line. Many college players make more money than their pro counterparts.
I am at a point wherein my position on any such pro v college issue is that I have a right to know as much as I want for any paid athlete, whether pro, college, Olympic, etc…Once you are paid you are not an amateur and I won’t treat you like a “kid”. Now I really don’t care about Lowe’s personal life anymore than I care about pro athletes personal lives. So I don’t care to know what is happening as I choose to only care about those young men actually playing for UM. But the college v pro distinction is completely gone at least for me.
Wasn't it well known that he attended practices but didn't participate?Yes and just to add to that, their actual personal life especially if nothing illegal, I am not saying is what matters. Their ON-FIELD impacts are the information I think should be shared. Its been incredibly vague. We literally have no idea if he is even practicing or not. Is he currently even with the team? Like all we know is he wasn't at the spring game I guess... Is he on campus? Was him not participating the teams/coaches decision or his? **** like that specifically regarding the team and his performance should absolutely be reported on. People saying that should be private imo are truly trippin. I haven't been saying I want to know the intimate details of what he actually did off the field (as long as legal) at is putting him in the doghouse. I think knowing what being in the doghouse entails or what his on field/performance did to put him in the doghouse IS relevant though.