forums

Miami Didn’t Play for the Name on the Front of the Jersey

Cane30 said:
The

The article was correct and to the point. You didn't sugarcoat it and you shouldn't have. We all saw it. The headline and the same quote mid article was in bad taste and shouldn't have been used. Miami didn't play for the team, should have been, Miami didn't play as a team. It was ugly across the board.
On to the next one, Trinton. Life is all about choices. Your good young man, pick yourself up and nail the next one. You are going to get criticised on these boards no matter what you post. Life goes on.
Click to expand...
Not going to criticize him for having original thought vs spamming the board with cut and paste article and Ai bot writing to increase clicks.

Come strong @Trinton Breeze and take what you dish out without being a salty prick about it and you'll be just fine.
 
Advertisement
You all know that I am a big fan of Shelton Henderson, BUT
Yesterday UVA absolutely took advantage of Henderson’s lack of shooting. What UVA did so well on defense was have Henderson’s defender double the post with Reneau received the ball. That allowed them to keep their very good defensive center back on Udeh, whihc completely negated 2 players. Henderson because he’s not a threat from 3, and Udeh who needs lobs to score.

We were basically playing 3 v 5 when we were on offense. This highlights a problem for UM in that we often have 2 non shooters on the floor.
I don’t think this is easy to replicate, and it really depends on a team having a great defensive center as UVA does. Luckily not many teams do. But as we know, big teams give UM problems.

UF and Michigan would be bad matchups for the same reason I still think we should win 1-2 games in the NCAA tournament but nothing is a given.
 
I didn’t particularly like what I saw yesterday.

But still, the article was unnecessary and defo lacked anything other than emotional gotchas
 
Back
Top