miami 3rd best hc opening

Yeah so nice to go to the SEC east to finish behind UT, UF and UGA. Spurrier winning was an anomoly. Back to the basement. Spurrier left faster than Bolt.
Using the potential strength of the SEC east division may be the lamest con I've ever seen. What happened to "any one, anywhere, anytime" ? If anything, playing in a challenging conference where you are constantly testing yourself against the best is a pro. With your logic, coaching in the sun belt is the best option.

How quick we forget in 1987 Miami went undefeated even though they played:
#20 UF
[URL=https://www.canesinsight.com/usertag.php?do=list&action=hash&hash=1]#1 0[/URL] Arkansas
#4 FSU
[URL=https://www.canesinsight.com/usertag.php?do=list&action=hash&hash=1]#1 0[/URL] Notre Dame
#8 South Carolina
#1 Oklahoma

I really hope our AD and next coaching staff returns to this mentality, eliminates all the FCS opponents from our out of conference scheduling, and makes sure our players are playing against the best of the best. They could also invest the money we save from not paying FCS schools and put it towards an indoor practice facility.
Your context is all out of whack bro. It does matter who your competition is to make the job more attractive or less. We are in the ACC coastal fighting against GT, UNC, Duke, Pitt, UVA and VT. Any decent coach would salivate at stomping those play for an ACC title and maybe NT with top class players. Rather than South Carolina where you have money, but at least 4 teams in your division of more of everything you have, history, money, fans, every. And don't mention the other side of the same conference. Nothing to do with schedule.
 
Advertisement
Yeah so nice to go to the SEC east to finish behind UT, UF and UGA. Spurrier winning was an anomoly. Back to the basement. Spurrier left faster than Bolt.
Using the potential strength of the SEC east division may be the lamest con I've ever seen. What happened to "any one, anywhere, anytime" ? If anything, playing in a challenging conference where you are constantly testing yourself against the best is a pro. With your logic, coaching in the sun belt is the best option.

How quick we forget in 1987 Miami went undefeated even though they played:
#20 UF
[URL=https://www.canesinsight.com/usertag.php?do=list&action=hash&hash=1]#1 0[/URL] Arkansas
#4 FSU
[URL=https://www.canesinsight.com/usertag.php?do=list&action=hash&hash=1]#1 0[/URL] Notre Dame
#8 South Carolina
#1 Oklahoma

I really hope our AD and next coaching staff returns to this mentality, eliminates all the FCS opponents from our out of conference scheduling, and makes sure our players are playing against the best of the best. They could also invest the money we save from not paying FCS schools and put it towards an indoor practice facility.
Your context is all out of whack bro. It does matter who your competition is to make the job more attractive or less. We are in the ACC coastal fighting against GT, UNC, Duke, Pitt, UVA and VT. Any decent coach would salivate at stomping those play for an ACC title and maybe NT with top class players. Rather than South Carolina where you have money, but at least 4 teams in your division of more of everything you have, history, money, fans, every. And don't mention the other side of the same conference. Nothing to do with schedule.

I can see where you're coming from in the sense that there are many coaches who "salivate" at the idea of stomping the ACC coastal, and see it as an easy path to a ring. What I'm saying is I want a coach who salivates at the thought of going up against the best of the best. A coach who not only wants to play the best, but demands the AD schedules the best. One who gets excited and thrives when he's faced with a challenge, a coach who wants to be great. Jimmy Johnson, coincidentally the HC of the 1987 team mentioned earlier, is a perfect example of a coach with this sort of mentality.
 
If we're willing to pay $4 million, as was reported, and USC is willing to pay 4.5-5 million, as is being reported, that's not substantially more. Yes, they have better fan support. Yes, they were getting 70,000 when they were 0-11 in 1999. So what? That doesn't make it easier to recruit to USC. Winning makes it easier to recruit.

Flat wrong. The entire recruiting process sells USC. I've seen it in action. They have somebody like Marcus Allen greet the recruit in front of the old historic physical education building, which is a centerpiece of campus. Heritage Hall is steps away. The song girls are working out in tight warmup outfits at the adjacent building. The football practice field is just to the west, along with the Dedeaux Field and the track and field venue. All first rate. Likewise the McDonald's swim stadium that was built for the 1984 Olympics. Then they walk toward the center of campus, stopping at the Tommy Trojan statue outside Bovard Auditorium. Very quaint section of campus. Doheny Library is on the other side, students sitting on the grass alongside the fountains. The Student Union building is right there also. It's a small campus but picturesque with lots of landmarks and natural greeting areas. I always have to laugh at outsiders who condemn USC based on surroundings. They have no clue. You don't think about those things at all while a student. The campus is excellent and there is amazing camaraderie.

Game day takes it to a different level, with all the colorful activities on campus including the band marching to the stadium. Recruits make that walk across Exposition Boulevard to the Coliseum. I've seen the smiles on their faces. They are already hooked.

That type of thing describes campuses all over the country. Not merely USC. That is the example I am most familiar with. Other schools may not have the tradition or recruiting base or pull of USC but the campus aspects contribute to how a recruit views the school. They can envision friends hanging around on campus and then walking to the game to see them play. Miami has none of that. It won't impact every kid but we can't be ignorant enough not to recognize the steady leak. As Jason Sehorn said today, "It's a drain on the program."

Here is that picture I took on Saturday. It is students lining up at halftime at 42-0 to use the shuttle buses back to campus. While this picture reflects badly on Golden I kept thinking how ridiculous it was in general, to ask students to make such a long commute in both directions. Some students who would otherwise attend every game simply aren't going to consider this type of annoyance and time expenditure.

View attachment 33118

Lovely. Would you be willing to write me a dissertation on The University of South Carolina? You know, the topic of this thread?
 
Last edited:
If we're willing to pay $4 million, as was reported, and USC is willing to pay 4.5-5 million, as is being reported, that's not substantially more. Yes, they have better fan support. Yes, they were getting 70,000 when they were 0-11 in 1999. So what? That doesn't make it easier to recruit to USC. Winning makes it easier to recruit.

Flat wrong. The entire recruiting process sells USC. I've seen it in action. They have somebody like Marcus Allen greet the recruit in front of the old historic physical education building, which is a centerpiece of campus. Heritage Hall is steps away. The song girls are working out in tight warmup outfits at the adjacent building. The football practice field is just to the west, along with the Dedeaux Field and the track and field venue. All first rate. Likewise the McDonald's swim stadium that was built for the 1984 Olympics. Then they walk toward the center of campus, stopping at the Tommy Trojan statue outside Bovard Auditorium. Very quaint section of campus. Doheny Library is on the other side, students sitting on the grass alongside the fountains. The Student Union building is right there also. It's a small campus but picturesque with lots of landmarks and natural greeting areas. I always have to laugh at outsiders who condemn USC based on surroundings. They have no clue. You don't think about those things at all while a student. The campus is excellent and there is amazing camaraderie.

Game day takes it to a different level, with all the colorful activities on campus including the band marching to the stadium. Recruits make that walk across Exposition Boulevard to the Coliseum. I've seen the smiles on their faces. They are already hooked.

That type of thing describes campuses all over the country. Not merely USC. That is the example I am most familiar with. Other schools may not have the tradition or recruiting base or pull of USC but the campus aspects contribute to how a recruit views the school. They can envision friends hanging around on campus and then walking to the game to see them play. Miami has none of that. It won't impact every kid but we can't be ignorant enough not to recognize the steady leak. As Jason Sehorn said today, "It's a drain on the program."

Here is that picture I took on Saturday. It is students lining up at halftime at 42-0 to use the shuttle buses back to campus. While this picture reflects badly on Golden I kept thinking how ridiculous it was in general, to ask students to make such a long commute in both directions. Some students who would otherwise attend every game simply aren't going to consider this type of annoyance and time expenditure.

View attachment 33118

Its almost like you wrote that whole thing out without knowing this thread is about South Carolina, not Southern California.

:6e482c_o:
 
LOL at USC east being a better job than Miami. It's only a better job if you're some SEC lifer who doesn't truly have national championship or NFL aspirations. USC east is historically one of the worst programs in major college football.

USC west is a better job than Miami, but not by as much as people think. USC, outside of the Pete Carroll years, has pretty much sucked since the 80's.
 
What's the easier path to the college football playoff?

USCe and the SEC?

Or Miami and the coastal of the ACC?
 
Back
Top