Beyond this just not being true, as
@Rellyrell can surely attest, I have a few questions (not just for you, necessarily)
First - seeing as how we are a "professional team" and all, can anyone show me an exhaustive list of professional franchises that do not own and/or operate their own facilities? Second, if stadiums are such terrible investments, why does every professional team (well, 90% at least) find it necessary to build a brand new one (or, at the very least, pump 100s of millions of dollars' worth of upgrades into their existing one) every 30 or so years? It's a necessary cost of doing business, not a "bad investment."
we are treated like a pro team, not a literal pro team. also, learn about how pro leagues work. example: the As are required to get a new stadium deal by 1/24 or they lose revenue sharing which means they cease to exist. leagues require certain things/imrpovements/deals of their teams. the fins were told to upgrade their facilities or lose out on a Super Bowl by the NFL.
Why has Michigan put 300 mil into the Big House? Tennessee 340 mil into Neyland? Texas 200 mil into DKR... If the answer is - "well, they are big state schools and have money to burn, and it's easier because the stadium is already on campus, and........." then we might as well just go the UConn/Villanova route. Drop down to FCS for football and focus what little money we do have on basketball. Maybe the Big East will take us back?
first understand that an on campus stadium is very diff from something off campus that we have to buy land at a premium and construct. Michigan tenn and Texas all built stadiums on a large campus footprint eons ago. this is like saying why has miami spent money to rebuilding dorms on campus. its on our own campus and we can invest money into it. that is very diff from saying here is 1.5 billion dollars, go build a stadium that is off campus and likely will be at least 20-30 min of a drive away (TP isnt happening get over it). Jesus Christ. improvements to existing on campus facilities are considered capital improvement projects (similar to that wording). it improves the campus, academics -- WE JUST SPENT MILLIONS ON AN IPF AND REDOING HECHT. WHY? BECAUSE ITS ON OUR OWN CAMPUS. WE CAN BUILD AS WE PLEASE AS LONG AS WE GET THE PERMITTING REQUIRED. ON TOP OF THAT, CG WOULD SHUT DOWN ANY IDEA OF A FOOTBALL STADIUM EVEN IF WE HAD SPACE WHICH WE DONT.
USF!!! just voted to spend 25 million on merely the design of their new stadium. The project will end up costing 300 million, at least. It's surely a dereliction of duty to waste all of that money, right? After all, they play in a stadium that is perfectly located off the highway in an industrial park next to the airport. It hosts Super Bowls and has a pirate ship! Why would they want to leave?
LOL A DESIGN IS VERY DIFFERENT THAN ACTUALLY BUILDING SOMETHING. THE RAYS HAVE TRIED FOR AGES TO GET A NEW BALLPARK AND HAVE GOTTEN CONSISTENTLY DENIED BY TAMPA BAY. RUIZ spent money on a design lol. how'd that go?