forums

Mario cast a pretty wide net for OC

Advertisement
Silentobserver said:
What offensive rep?

I know we have generated an offensive narrative here on CIS, but I'm not sure it's accurate when you look at who Mario has hired in the past like Scott Satterfield.
Click to expand...


Accuracy doesn't matter to the Mope Squad. They will tell you about how perception equals reality, all while they distort perception with their nonstop complaints and myth-building.
 
SinisterCane said:
Lol you calling me and posters like myself mopes when we’ve been right a majority of the time

Mario‘s hiring process cast a wider net for speculation too
Click to expand...


So when we win more games, you won't have any problems with "slurpers" being "right" a majority of the time, correct?

Look, you're a toxic negative person. This has nothing to do with "right" or "wrong".

You just posted about an OC candidate who did NOT get a job offer...turning down the (non-existent) offer because of Mario's "rep". That's just the kind of toxic negative *********ion that you indulge in.

I don't criticize all of your ****porsts, just the ones that have no basis in reality. You want to be "right", I don't give a ****.

But that doesn't give you some authorization to invent false speculation just to express your own personal misery.
 
Brooklyndee said:
It's why it's so laughable when the EXPERTS put all the blame all Mario constantly for anything & everything. Mario's only prerequisite has always been he wants an efficient offense that puts pressure on a defense. How he goes about that is irrelevant.
Click to expand...

Exactly!
 
TheOriginalCane said:
So when we win more games, you won't have any problems with "slurpers" being "right" a majority of the time, correct?

Look, you're a toxic negative person. This has nothing to do with "right" or "wrong".

You just posted about an OC candidate who did NOT get a job offer...turning down the (non-existent) offer because of Mario's "rep". That's just the kind of toxic negative *********ion that you indulge in.

I don't criticize all of your ****porsts, just the ones that have no basis in reality. You want to be "right", I don't give a ****.

But that doesn't give you some authorization to invent false speculation just to express your own personal misery.
Click to expand...
Let’s put me and you to rest, win more games and I’ll never have a problem saying you and the Slurp Clan were right. We both want the Canes to win, I just don’t believe Mario is the coach to get it done
 
Last edited:
sfcane2 said:
Evidently he looked closely at William and Mary’s OC.

“It’s also why several FBS programs, including Miami, gave Taylor strong consideration for their offensive coordinator vacancies.”

Click to expand...


JayCane20 said:
He can coach WR too and makes **** money. If they can align it with Dawson he could be WRC/PGC.
Click to expand...

With the rumors of Hankerson dropping out, do you think this is an actual possibility?

Ive been catching up on W&Ms offense... all i can say is WOW!
 
Advertisement
SinisterCane said:
Meddling with OCs
Click to expand...
If that's so, then hopefully he corrects course. But, what evidence is there that Mario meddles with his OCs?

Again, we generate narratives here without evidence unless I missed something from Gattis, or any of our insiders providing us proof that Mario has his hands all over what the OC can or cannot do. Mario has a preference - physical offense and an emphasis on running the ball - but where does that preference lead to he meddles?
 
423Hurricane said:
I think that narrative can be put to bed with the hiring of Dawson.
Click to expand...
Not really. “Part of his history is being in the ‘Air-Raid’ system, but as you can see over the last several years, those guys have transformed and evolved into guys that get downhill in the run game with power, counter, split-zone, and pin-and-pull and all that good stuff.”
 
hoops156 said:
so i dont get it. we field the worst offense in the football era of this school and now we have posters saying i told you so before we even take a spring snap? im happy w the direction of the new OC hire but w offense, you gotta show it first. he could run the wishbone as long as we score. we didnt score last year. also, interesting how the posters who couldnt take the heat when we **** the bed now returned to CIS saying i told you so lol bc were offseason champs again.
Click to expand...

Indeed. The comments in this thread vs how similar treated previous “staphs” is enlightening.
 
Silentobserver said:
If that's so, then hopefully he corrects course. But, what evidence is there that Mario meddles with his OCs?

Again, we generate narratives here without evidence unless I missed something from Gattis, or any of our insiders providing us proof that Mario has his hands all over what the OC can or cannot do. Mario has a preference - physical offense and an emphasis on running the ball - but where does that preference lead to he meddles?
Click to expand...


How dare you try to debunk the Mope Squad myths. Definitionally, that makes you a Slurper. I guess...
 
JamesQuall said:
Be honest though. Had we hired the OC from William and Mary’s (School of the Deaf and Blind). What would your reaction have been?
Click to expand...


Don't test him. He's got a WIDE variety of justifications for his mopery. I'm sure he would have ripped Taylor for being unproven, coming from a lower level, and being an unsexy name, in additon to complaining about how "we have all this money, and this is all we could get"...
 
Advertisement
SinisterCane said:
The same as Dawson…….wait and see. When Dawson was hired I didn’t slurp nor Mope. Let’s see what happens
Click to expand...


Yeah, you're such a kind and open-minded "wait-and-see" person when it comes to Dawson...



1677598585324.png
 
TheOriginalCane said:
Don't test him. He's got a WIDE variety of justifications for his mopery. I'm sure he would have ripped Taylor for being unproven, coming from a lower level, and being an unsexy name, in additon to complaining about how "we have all this money, and this is all we could get"...
Click to expand...
I don't know enough about him but I am more than sure there would have been more than one poRster that would have been very poRst unhappy whether we hired him or not because they love to troll.

"I can't believe Mario didn't hire this guy."
"I can't believe Mario hired this guy."

People are going to be negative no matter what. Mario did them and himself no favors in year 1 though. However, I think we will have a much better team going forward as long as he continues to live up to his reputation as a recruiter. And hopefully with him allowing Dawson full control of the offense showing that he's willing to change what his perceived style is (which should be whatever it takes to win).
 
SinisterCane said:
Do I ever come after you for the **** you say that I don’t agree with? You seem to follow me around, so I’m giving you a heads up that in a few I’ll be in the QB recruiting thread
Click to expand...
Um, actually, I didn't come after you, I just told someone else to ignore your ****, so they didn't waste their time. If that offends you or upsets you in any way, shape, or form, then I sincerely apologize because you have me confused with someone who gives a ****.
 
Back
Top