- Joined
- Jan 1, 2012
- Messages
- 6,870
No matter what kind of great turnaround the slurpers claim can happen, this season is over.
We are NOT a contender for the Coastal (guranteed losses against Free Shoes and at VT, and if you think we sweep the rest of the awful Coastal, ie GT, UNC, Duke, UVA and Pitt, I will ask "why? We've never done it before?") and we play a bad, but ranked, winning record team at Nebrska, which history says we get blown out at.
So. What is a successful season? 8-4, third in the Coastal?
Is that some sort of validation of this staff?
Or is a miracle 9-3 and 3rd in the Coastal the golden tickert?
To me, winning the Coastal is the absolute minimum that we could do to have a season worthy of anything but a firing of the whole staff.
Whats your standard?
And don't say "improvement". Too many slurpers claimed last year's 3rd in the Coastal and a blowout mid level bowl game was an improvement. It was not.
We are NOT a contender for the Coastal (guranteed losses against Free Shoes and at VT, and if you think we sweep the rest of the awful Coastal, ie GT, UNC, Duke, UVA and Pitt, I will ask "why? We've never done it before?") and we play a bad, but ranked, winning record team at Nebrska, which history says we get blown out at.
So. What is a successful season? 8-4, third in the Coastal?
Is that some sort of validation of this staff?
Or is a miracle 9-3 and 3rd in the Coastal the golden tickert?
To me, winning the Coastal is the absolute minimum that we could do to have a season worthy of anything but a firing of the whole staff.
Whats your standard?
And don't say "improvement". Too many slurpers claimed last year's 3rd in the Coastal and a blowout mid level bowl game was an improvement. It was not.