forums

Leach is a corch

AHURT12 said:
What position is special about our roster? Qb? Oline? Just curious.
Click to expand...
compared to WSU? our Linebackers, receivers, te's and dl are far superior talent wise. I will also take our rbs and dbs over WSU's rbs and dbs
 
Advertisement
PanamaCityCanes said:
Yeah, I do, but you can't use "stars" and you have to remove all the kids who aren't here anymore from those illustrious recruiting classes of the past few years.
Click to expand...
cool so you'd replace our starting wrs with Rodrik Fisher? Brandon Arconado? Renard Bell? Dezmond Patmon? You taking Max Borghi and Deion Mcintosh over our starting rbs?

I wont even touch defense because there talent is so great at WSU....

With our corching staff we would have 1 win with WSU's roster and our scheme
 
da truth said:
compared to WSU? our Linebackers, receivers, te's and dl are far superior talent wise. I will also take our rbs and dbs over WSU's rbs and dbs
Click to expand...
Keep in mind you left out our oline and qb, with a decent to solid qb and oline combination you wont win much in football. That's where this team is right now.
 
AHURT12 said:
Keep in mind you left out our oline and qb, with a decent to solid qb and oline combination you wont win much in football. That's where this team is right now.
Click to expand...
got me on ol but with any competent oc our qb play isn't whats hurting us
 
da truth said:
cool so you'd replace our starting wrs with Rodrik Fisher? Brandon Arconado? Renard Bell? Dezmond Patmon? You taking Max Borghi and Deion Mcintosh over our starting rbs?

I wont even touch defense because there talent is so great at WSU....

With our corching staff we would have 1 win with WSU's roster and our scheme
Click to expand...
WSU is well coached. Our kids are not well coached.
 
Advertisement
DiegoCane said:
Erickson 12-10-1 .543
Price 83-78 .516
Leach 49-40 .551

Leach took over WSU when they were in the absolute gutter (7-29 the 3 years prior). Price (15-17), Erickson (13-19).
Click to expand...

Erikson was there for 2 years. He as still cleaning up the mess he was left with. Compare Leachs first 2 years to eriksons first 2 years.
Leach was 3-9 and 6-7
Erikson 3-7-1 and 9-3

Price won the Pac-12 twice. And this was when the Pac-12 wasn't the biggest joke in CFB.

Regardless, this was about recruiting. Not records. They proved you can recruit at WSU. So saying Leach can't recruit because of the school is just an excuse made by losers. Feel free to try and build up another strawman though.
 
OriginalGatorHater said:
Erikson was there for 2 years. He as still cleaning up the mess he was left with. Compare Leachs first 2 years to eriksons first 2 years.
Leach was 3-9 and 6-7
Erikson 3-7-1 and 9-3

Price won the Pac-12 twice. And this was when the Pac-12 wasn't the biggest joke in CFB.

Regardless, this was about recruiting. Not records. They proved you can recruit at WSU. So saying Leach can't recruit because of the school is just an excuse made by losers. Feel free to try and build up another strawman though.
Click to expand...

My memory was completely wrong on this. I thought Erickson had a better record at WSU than that.
 
TemplarCane said:
Who were the elite kids Erickson recruited during the two years (12-10-1) at WSU? He was a terrible recruiter at Miami. How was he an elite recruiter in Pullman?
Click to expand...

That is my point. Erikson, wasn't an elite recruiter, yet he still could pull elite kids to WSU. That means Leach really must suck at recruiting to be recruiting like he does at the same school. His 2 classes ended up having like 9 draft picks. Much more than Leach ever did and that was only his first 2 classes. Look at all the elite guys Price recruited, like Drew Bledsoe.
 
OriginalGatorHater said:
Erikson was there for 2 years. He as still cleaning up the mess he was left with. Compare Leachs first 2 years to eriksons first 2 years.
Leach was 3-9 and 6-7
Erikson 3-7-1 and 9-3

Price won the Pac-12 twice. And this was when the Pac-12 wasn't the biggest joke in CFB.

Regardless, this was about recruiting. Not records. They proved you can recruit at WSU. So saying Leach can't recruit because of the school is just an excuse made by losers. Feel free to try and build up another strawman though.
Click to expand...

Wash St is top 10 in Offensive S&P+ rankings every yr, so the entire pt of him being a poor recruiter is irrelevant. It's pretty easy to understand that they are 4-4 not because of Offense. At MIA he would have access to defensive talent that he would never be able to attain @ WSU, and that fact would hold true whether he recruits well or not.
 
Advertisement
craval85 said:
Wash St is top 10 in Offensive S&P+ rankings every yr, so the entire pt of him being a poor recruiter is irrelevant. It's pretty easy to understand that they are 4-4 not because of Offense. At MIA he would have access to defensive talent that he would never be able to attain @ WSU, and that fact would hold true whether he recruits well or not.
Click to expand...

They also play trash defenses every year. He would end up with the same type of defense here because he can't recruit. Look at Mike Price, he was able to recruit at WSU. Its not WSU, its Leach.
 
Back
Top