forums

Knighton to Wr?

native said:
What say you, yes or no. I'd try him at the slot.
Click to expand...
1615337114441.gif
 
Advertisement
Instead of the slot, how about Lashlee reinvent the Flexbone for the 21st century and we figure out a way to have 3 RBs on the field.

HB1: Knighton
HB 2: Chaney
FB: Cam
 
I wouldn’t be against moving him outside in certain packages like the patriots do with James white just to give him more room to work with, but he’s a running back all day and twice on Saturday.
 
Dunking on OP is fun, but this isn't even in the same galaxy as some of the retarded threads on here.

Full-time, sure, incredibly moronic. But I've been saying since he was committed to FSU that I see a very versatile kid who should be used a lot in the MOF. So the thread title, yeah. Dunk away. But IMO it'd be very savvy to get him matched up on backers in the middle of the field and on the edges. How do you do that? You go 21, you make the opposing DC play heavy, and you split him into the slot or you motion him out of the backfield.

So, OP, yeah, you're getting what you deserve. You should have known what "Knighton to WR" would bring. But IMO if he catches less than 25 balls next year, it's a massive fail on Lashlee's part. He should be used much more in the passing game than any of our backs were last year. The 3 backs COMBINED for 40 catches last year in 11 games. If I'm calling this offense, Rooster pushes that number by himself next season.
 
Advertisement
**** just dont see him seeing the field at RB. How many carries do you all see him getting? I dont see it!
 
OrangeBowlMagic said:
Dunking on OP is fun, but this isn't even in the same galaxy as some of the retarded threads on here.

Full-time, sure, incredibly moronic. But I've been saying since he was committed to FSU that I see a very versatile kid who should be used a lot in the MOF. So the thread title, yeah. Dunk away. But IMO it'd be very savvy to get him matched up on backers in the middle of the field and on the edges. How do you do that? You go 21, you make the opposing DC play heavy, and you split him into the slot or you motion him out of the backfield.

So, OP, yeah, you're getting what you deserve. You should have known what "Knighton to WR" would bring. But IMO if he catches less than 25 balls next year, it's a massive fail on Lashlee's part. He should be used much more in the passing game than any of our backs were last year. The 3 backs COMBINED for 40 catches last year in 11 games. If I'm calling this offense, Rooster pushes that number by himself next season.
Click to expand...
21 personnel..two backs 1 TE..if u flex a back most DCs would check to single high 3 and flex out a safety...Lashlee did this once. I forget what game. But he got chaney matched up with a SS on a 9. So yeah it’s in the playbook.

we’ve also seen Lashlee use this formation vs Louisville. That’s the play rooster ran the wheel and the Ss bit on kings power run fake. So yeah it’s in the playbook for sure
 
Advertisement
305to954 said:
21 personnel..two backs 1 TE..if u flex a back most DCs would check to single high 3 and flex out a safety...Lashlee did this once. I forget what game. But he got chaney matched up with a SS on a 9. So yeah it’s in the playbook.

we’ve also seen Lashlee use this formation vs Louisville. That’s the play rooster ran the wheel and the Ss bit on kings power run fake. So yeah it’s in the playbook for sure
Click to expand...

Great points and post, agree 100% but I wasn’t saying it wasn’t in the playbook. It is, but Lashlee has to exploit it. We know WR isn’t a strength of the team, and we lost Brevin. Knighton has incredible hands, runs very crisp routes and is shifty as ****. It’s in the book, but Lashlee needs to make it a point to throw him the football this year.
 
Back
Top