Kirby Smart is a Corch

Cool. Thanks for answering the question.

You continually make stupid points.

Kirby Smart could "fail" at Georgia just like Dooley failed at Tennessee or Muschamp failed at Florida. Both of them were Saban disciples and both failed at big SEC schools.
 
Advertisement
What are you talking about?
What point am I making?

You can't even remember the silly point you just made yesterday?

You claimed that Kirby has Georgia on an upward trajectory. Then you said if they went 9-3 next year you'd change your tune. So you seem to swing wildly from year to year and have no idea what a trend line actually is.

Kirby inherited a 10-3 team and went 8-5. The 2016 team, with almost the exact same roster as this year, was only +7 in point differential. That team was basically one of the worst Georgia teams since the turn of the century.

This year they had 31 seniors and several Juniors who are going to turn pro.

If they go 9-3 next year then this will be the trend line:

Richt
10 wins
Smart
8 wins
13 wins
9 wins

That's not an upward trajectory.
 
Kirby Smart could "fail" at Georgia just like Dooley failed at Tennessee or Muschamp failed at Florida. Both of them were Saban disciples and both failed at big SEC schools.

In fact, Muschamp had a nearly identical start at Florida that Smart just had at Georgia.

Smart
8-5
13-2 (#3 in playoff)

Muschamp
7-6
11-2 (#4 in final regular season AP Poll)

So, again, if they playoff existed back in 2012 then Florida could've been in it.
 
Cool. Thanks for answering the question.

You continually make stupid points.

Kirby Smart could "fail" at Georgia just like Dooley failed at Tennessee or Muschamp failed at Florida. Both of them were Saban disciples and both failed at big SEC schools.

And you continue to be a condescending fa99ot.

Show me where I said that being a Saban disciple guarantees success. I just mentioned it, that's all.
 
What are you talking about?
What point am I making?

You can't even remember the silly point you just made yesterday?

You claimed that Kirby has Georgia on an upward trajectory. Then you said if they went 9-3 next year you'd change your tune. So you seem to swing wildly from year to year and have no idea what a trend line actually is.

Kirby inherited a 10-3 team and went 8-5. The 2016 team, with almost the exact same roster as this year, was only +7 in point differential. That team was basically one of the worst Georgia teams since the turn of the century.

This year they had 31 seniors and several Juniors who are going to turn pro.

If they go 9-3 next year then this will be the trend line:

Richt
10 wins
Smart
8 wins
13 wins
9 wins

That's not an upward trajectory.

I didn't really make a point, I simply said they were trending upward. When somebody asked me if I would change my tune after a 9-3 season I sarcastically said that I would change it again after they went 11-1 the following season.

It wasn't a "point" and really wasn't even worth addressing.
 
And you continue to be a condescending fa99ot.

Show me where I said that being a Saban disciple guarantees success. I just mentioned it, that's all.

So pleasant when your claims get shot to pieces.

What makes yall think a Saban disciple, who (also) recruits at a high level, is going to fail at UGA?

Not saying it's impossible, I'd just like to hear the logic.

You didn't just mention it. You asked for the logic. I gave it you. Then you cried.
 
I didn't really make a point, I simply said they were trending upward. When somebody asked me if I would change my tune after a 9-3 season I sarcastically said that I would change it again after they went 11-1 the following season.

It wasn't a "point" and really wasn't even worth addressing.

Well, yeah, you didn't really make a point because a point would have some backing to it. Georgia is only on an upward trajectory if you account for the fact that they were worse in Kirby's first year and therefore 2017 looks better by comparison.

It's just as dumb as your claim that Coker sucked because his teams didn't improve. Yeah, when you start 24-0 it's impossible to "improve" at all. So what you're saying is that if Cooker had gone 10-2 in 2001 then he would've been worthy of credit later on for "improvement" of the team?

What you said was ridiculous.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top