Yes. First we thought it was unimaginable to lose Bostwick. Then we surpassed all levels of fail previously thought possible letting Morschamp take Moten from STA. Now we've gone full ludicrous spread and lost a 5star kid from Chaminade Madonna whose parents are season ticket holders at a position where we've taken 2 kids in 3 years. My daughter's yorkshire terrier could out-recruit this bull****.
So you think it is bc of lack of effort?
I don't care what it is. There are 20,000 coaches who could do better at the University of Miami than land a grand total of Ivery and Moore in 3 years and then lose a 5 star season ticket holder from Chaminade.
Okay a few things
1. No disrespect but you sound like a child and you're supposed to be a Mod. I am not going to preach about "NSD is X months away" or "the gaytors paid the kid." He likely will go to UF and we will need to find someone else. With that said I assure you the staff is not losing kids like Moten, M. Thomas or Clark for lack of effort. I am not making excuses, in the end the staff will fail or succeed by how well they recruit and develop (the development is key).
2. They landed more than that but the key is not landing, it is developing the kids. A few kids UM has signed in the past have turned out to be bums that were highly recruited (i.e Marcus Forston), that doesn't mean that every 5 star will be a bum and this isnt a stars argument. It means IMO that even if you sign them you must develop them. The development determines the success, stud DTs who cant be developed will result in failure for the staff just like landing unknown projects at the position and failing to developing those projects.
3. Miami will live and die by their success or failure at the line. It is the most important position, so if they are not landing XYX they better land replacements and develop those players.
