Kendrick Norton tweet

[Canezum5]

If you think Norton projects better then McIntosh, perhaps you shouldn't be calling people idiots.. unless of course you're standing at the bathroom counter.

Football scientist will point out how norton takes up blockers. That means norton is a better prospect than mcintosh according to football scientist who is provy to the secrets of football us non-scientists arent privy too.

Its common sense.

Its respecting the "how/why" instead of JUST the end result.

 

[L A M P]

Football scientist will point out how norton takes up blockers. That means norton is a better prospect than mcintosh according to football scientist who is provy to the secrets of football us non-scientists arent privy too.

Lol. Well maybe these "scientist" should recalculate their formulas bc Norton's come a dime a dozen in the NFL. McIntosh is going to jump up the draft boards. He'd be crazy to come back.

 

[Canezum5]

If you think Norton projects better then McIntosh, perhaps you shouldn't be calling people idiots.. unless of course you're standing at the bathroom counter.

Yes, Norton would project better.

The only reason you think Mac is better because you see his effect on the field but did you ever think his impact was directly related to Nortons impact.

3 technique tackles are much more common than 1 techs. 1 techs don't get the accolades and they don't show up on film and the stat sheets but they keep guys like Mcintosh from being sealed out and double teamed. They set the point of attack and anchor the run defense.

A guy like that is much more of a commodity than a guy who splits gaps.

Kendrick would be much more of a prospect than Mac in this evaluation.

This is why I compared you idiots to the fools who praise the Running back but don't respect the o-line.

You clearly don't know **** about player evaluation. just keep pulling up stats and highlights.

Go that way --->with the stupidity....

Quoted for posterity. Football scientists are extremely predictable

Prove it wrong. Rebuttal. Counter argument.

You have none.

So you look like a fool with your typical deflection.

 

[StoneWallLoungeCane]

Football scientist will point out how norton takes up blockers. That means norton is a better prospect than mcintosh according to football scientist who is provy to the secrets of football us non-scientists arent privy too.

Lol. Well maybe these "scientist" should recalculate their formulas bc Norton's come a dime a dozen in the NFL. McIntosh is going to jump up the draft boards. He'd be crazy to come back.

Football scientist will be busy in the lab during draft time.

 

[Canezum5]

Football scientist will point out how norton takes up blockers. That means norton is a better prospect than mcintosh according to football scientist who is provy to the secrets of football us non-scientists arent privy too.

Lol. Well maybe these "scientist" should recalculate their formulas bc Norton's come a dime a dozen in the NFL. McIntosh is going to jump up the draft boards. He'd be crazy to come back.

What?

Man, im done. I cant stoop so low as to even argue with this level of stupidity.

 

[StoneWallLoungeCane]

If you think Norton projects better then McIntosh, perhaps you shouldn't be calling people idiots.. unless of course you're standing at the bathroom counter.

Yes, Norton would project better.

The only reason you think Mac is better because you see his effect on the field but did you ever think his impact was directly related to Nortons impact.

3 technique tackles are much more common than 1 techs. 1 techs don't get the accolades and they don't show up on film and the stat sheets but they keep guys like Mcintosh from being sealed out and double teamed. They set the point of attack and anchor the run defense.

A guy like that is much more of a commodity than a guy who splits gaps.

Kendrick would be much more of a prospect than Mac in this evaluation.

This is why I compared you idiots to the fools who praise the Running back but don't respect the o-line.

You clearly don't know **** about player evaluation. just keep pulling up stats and highlights.

Go that way --->with the stupidity....

Quoted for posterity. Football scientists are extremely predictable

Prove it wrong. Rebuttal. Counter argument.

You have none.

So you look like a fool with your typical deflection.

It’s hard to rebut “if you disagree with me you are an idiot” so i’ll leave your New England journal of Football article for others.

 

[L A M P]

Fully aware of the difference in 3 tech vs 1 tech, unsung heroes on OL, etc... problem is you are acting like Norton is Big Vince.. Spoiler: He is not.

 

[Canezum5]

If you think Norton projects better then McIntosh, perhaps you shouldn't be calling people idiots.. unless of course you're standing at the bathroom counter.

Yes, Norton would project better.

The only reason you think Mac is better because you see his effect on the field but did you ever think his impact was directly related to Nortons impact.

3 technique tackles are much more common than 1 techs. 1 techs don't get the accolades and they don't show up on film and the stat sheets but they keep guys like Mcintosh from being sealed out and double teamed. They set the point of attack and anchor the run defense.

A guy like that is much more of a commodity than a guy who splits gaps.

Kendrick would be much more of a prospect than Mac in this evaluation.

This is why I compared you idiots to the fools who praise the Running back but don't respect the o-line.

You clearly don't know **** about player evaluation. just keep pulling up stats and highlights.

Go that way --->with the stupidity....

Quoted for posterity. Football scientists are extremely predictable

Prove it wrong. Rebuttal. Counter argument.

You have none.

So you look like a fool with your typical deflection.

It’s hard to rebut “if you disagree with me you are an idiot” so i’ll leave your New England journal of Football article for others.

That's what I thought. No debate

 

[StoneWallLoungeCane]

Yes, Norton would project better.

The only reason you think Mac is better because you see his effect on the field but did you ever think his impact was directly related to Nortons impact.

3 technique tackles are much more common than 1 techs. 1 techs don't get the accolades and they don't show up on film and the stat sheets but they keep guys like Mcintosh from being sealed out and double teamed. They set the point of attack and anchor the run defense.

A guy like that is much more of a commodity than a guy who splits gaps.

Kendrick would be much more of a prospect than Mac in this evaluation.

This is why I compared you idiots to the fools who praise the Running back but don't respect the o-line.

You clearly don't know **** about player evaluation. just keep pulling up stats and highlights.

Go that way --->with the stupidity....

Quoted for posterity. Football scientists are extremely predictable

Prove it wrong. Rebuttal. Counter argument.

You have none.

So you look like a fool with your typical deflection.

It’s hard to rebut “if you disagree with me you are an idiot” so i’ll leave your New England journal of Football article for others.

That's what I thought. No debate

Looking forward to your next peer-reviewed article, “QBs are more of a commodity than RBs: why Malik Rosier is a better prospect than Leonard Fournette”

 

[Canezum5]

Fully aware of the difference in 3 tech vs 1 tech, unsung heroes on OL, etc... problem is you are acting like Norton is Big Vince.. Spoiler: He is not.

No. im acting like he is more valuable to this defense and the NFL than Mcintosh is. That you have no debate against

 

[L A M P]

Fully aware of the difference in 3 tech vs 1 tech, unsung heroes on OL, etc... problem is you are acting like Norton is Big Vince.. Spoiler: He is not.

No. im acting like he is more valuable to this defense and the NFL than Mcintosh is. That you have no debate against

Speaking in absolutes and calling names doesn't make you correct. There is no need to debate your assertion. You're entitled to your opinion, even if it's inaccurate.

 

[StoneWallLoungeCane]

Canezum defended his thesis “OL’s pave the way for RBs: why brett romberg was a better prospect than mcgahee”

 

[Canezum5]

Fully aware of the difference in 3 tech vs 1 tech, unsung heroes on OL, etc... problem is you are acting like Norton is Big Vince.. Spoiler: He is not.

No. im acting like he is more valuable to this defense and the NFL than Mcintosh is. That you have no debate against

Speaking in absolutes and calling names doesn't make you correct. There is no need to debate your assertion. You're entitled to your opinion, even if it's inaccurate.

Then make a statement/fact that proves me wrong.

You saying ' you're not right". Isn't any rebuttal and it just makes you look childish and foolish. But continue to digress....

 

[Canezum5]

Canezum defended his thesis “OL’s pave the way for Wisconsin RBs consistently and successfully: why Wisconsin Olineman are better prospects than Wisconsin RBs”

FIFY

 

[DTP]

I'm curious to see what grade the advisory board gives them. A lot of people here tend to overrate our players because they really don't watch any other teams. RJ is going to have to prove to NFL scouts he can play the run besides shooting gaps and getting behind the line. he tended to get bullied by quicker, stronger linemen. Watch the Clemson game again, if you dare. If you're going to be a Warren Sapp, "play the run on the way to the quarterback" type of defensive tackle, you better be one **** of a fantastic pass rusher.

Norton will have a career because 1 technique guys who command double teams and don't get blown off the ball are super rare. Not sure he's quite consistent enough right now to be worth an early pick though. He could definitely use more seasoning.

 

[Calinative]

I don't think it'd be a bad decision for RJ to leave early.

Also, as far as which one I'd rather stay, its easily Norton. Fact is we got Willis coming back, and a bunch of 3tech DTs. But that 1tech role is much harder to fill. So if Norton returns I'm happy, regardless what McIntosh decides to do.

Will say though, McIntosh does have to consider how much PT he will get with Willis coming back. Because if McIntosh returns, but gets a big reduction in snaps, then that could easily hurt his draft stock. So imo, McIntosh has the harder decision to make, because Willis will eat into his snaps, thats just a fact.

 

[ChosenOne]

Translation: 5th round draft

 

[Calinative]

I'm curious to see what grade the advisory board gives them. A lot of people here tend to overrate our players because they really don't watch any other teams. RJ is going to have to prove to NFL scouts he can play the run besides shooting gaps and getting behind the line. he tended to get bullied by quicker, stronger linemen. Watch the Clemson game again, if you dare. If you're going to be a Warren Sapp, "play the run on the way to the quarterback" type of defensive tackle, you better be one **** of a fantastic pass rusher.

Norton will have a career because 1 technique guys who command double teams and don't get blown off the ball are super rare. Not sure he's quite consistent enough right now to be worth an early pick though. He could definitely use more seasoning.

Advisory board only gives 3 grades:
1st rounder
2nd rounder
Neither - Remain in school.

Neither of these two will receive a 1st or 2nd round evaluation.

 

[simplycanes]

I don't think it'd be a bad decision for RJ to leave early.

Also, as far as which one I'd rather stay, its easily Norton. Fact is we got Willis coming back, and a bunch of 3tech DTs. But that 1tech role is much harder to fill. So if Norton returns I'm happy, regardless what McIntosh decides to do.

Will say though, McIntosh does have to consider how much PT he will get with Willis coming back. Because if McIntosh returns, but gets a big reduction in snaps, then that could easily hurt his draft stock. So imo, McIntosh has the harder decision to make, because Willis will eat into his snaps, thats just a fact.

All else equal, given how much we rotate the line I don't think Willis returning is much of a factor in the decision. It's entirely based on what feedback he gets, if he hasn't made up his mind already which many believed he already had before the season anyway, including his family.

 

[Stylie]

"Assuming," being the key word here and wishful thinking of course, a Norton/ Willis combo would be pretty wicked for the 2018 season. I think RJ is gone. You never know though.