Kehoe calls Romberg and Joaquin and yells at them

[Cane Dynasty]

They way he's packed on the pounds I'd say Miami is paying him well.

 

[GonzoCane]

Getting fired isn't good enough for Golden. I hope he ends up working at a Pep Boys in Hoboken. ******* scumbag.

He'd have Manny, Moe, and Jack 10 yards off the tire they were suppose to change.

 

[Odin]

I read "the game has changed" differently--moreso that Golden believes that there's more parity and it's harder for us to dominate perhaps especially with the rise of the SEC. That's how the game has changed moreso than anything schematic which is always evolving.

I say that because I do firmly believe that Golden is of the philosophy that winning is hard and grinding your way to a 9-4 season replete with 28-24 wins is a good performance. That's why he's better served at a lesser program where that type of perspective is more in line with the fanbase.

Completely agree with this,losing doesn't keep Golden up at night or eat him up inside.He's used to mediocrity having coached at Virginia and Temple,8-9 win seasons is acceptable to him.This is not JJ getting embarrassed at Oklahoma ST by Nebraska,Oklahoma,Texas and finally having a talented team at miami and getting back at them.

 

[Duvalco.Cane]

Getting fired isn't good enough for Golden. I hope he ends up working at a Pep Boys in Hoboken. ****ing scumbag.

He'd have Manny, Moe, and Jack 10 yards off the tire they were suppose to change.

LMAO!!!! Easily the funniest **** I've read all day!

 

[Duvalco.Cane]

I read "the game has changed" differently--moreso that Golden believes that there's more parity and it's harder for us to dominate perhaps especially with the rise of the SEC. That's how the game has changed moreso than anything schematic which is always evolving.

I say that because I do firmly believe that Golden is of the philosophy that winning is hard and grinding your way to a 9-4 season replete with 28-24 wins is a good performance. That's why he's better served at a lesser program where that type of perspective is more in line with the fanbase.

Completely agree with this,losing doesn't keep Golden up at night or eat him up inside.He's used to mediocrity having coached at Virginia and Temple,8-9 win seasons is acceptable to him.This is not JJ getting embarrassed at Oklahoma ST by Nebraska,Oklahoma,Texas and finally having a talented team at miami and getting back at them.

This. ...and this is the reason this fat fck should be shown the door at the end of this season. This ***** is small- time..Miami is big-time. Get this ***** away from my football program!

 

[algoldenshair]

Convinced more and more each day that golden has an undercover mission courtesy of ped st to destroy miami from the inside.

 

[luke137]

Convinced more and more each day that golden has an undercover mission courtesy of ped st to destroy miami from the inside.

I'm not a conspiracy theorist but I actually believe this. Other than metal retardation there is no explanation for Golden's incompetency as HC. He is worse than Coker and Shannon combined with a dash of Tad Foote's arrogance and disconnect with the fans.

 

[Cane18]

How Golden hired this guy is hard to comprehend. The game passed him by long ago.

 

[canes23]

"None of our safeties are good at playing the ball in the air"

1) I can't stand when grown men throw kids under the bus it's disgusting and does not stop.

2) Maybe if Fentress didn't touch the field and they let the leash loose like Jamal said after Duke, then they would fly around and make some plays.

totally agree here!!! Sad!!

 

[poncho0091]

Most of us are reasonable enough to understand we won't win the championship every year, but even more important most of us could probably live with 2-3 losses each year as long as we look like a contender and we lose close games against good teams and did not get run off the field.

The fck you talking about? A bad season should be 3 losses here. And that should occur very rarely. Fck those moral victories you long for.

You totally missed the point. Almost every program has the occasional 3 loss season over time and 2 losses is pretty common. This is not longing for moral victories, it's being realistic. Even Alabama has a 3 loss year in the last 5. Yes we could consider a 3 loss team a bad season, but if I asked you if you would take that 3 loss 2005 team over this trash now, what would you say? We still had a good team. It was not 2001 team, but it was a good team and people were only mad, because we expected that team to do better. Right now we expect this team to suck and 3 losses would be considered a good thing.

 

[The Franchise]

Most of us are reasonable enough to understand we won't win the championship every year, but even more important most of us could probably live with 2-3 losses each year as long as we look like a contender and we lose close games against good teams and did not get run off the field.

The fck you talking about? A bad season should be 3 losses here. And that should occur very rarely. Fck those moral victories you long for.

You totally missed the point. Almost every program has the occasional 3 loss season over time and 2 losses is pretty common. This is not longing for moral victories, it's being realistic. Even Alabama has a 3 loss year in the last 5. Yes we could consider a 3 loss team a bad season, but if I asked you if you would take that 3 loss 2005 team over this trash now, what would you say? We still had a good team. It was not 2001 team, but it was a good team and people were only mad, because we expected that team to do better. Right now we expect this team to suck and 3 losses would be considered a good thing.

Loser talk. I took your words exactly as they were written. You said the fans would be happy with 2 to 3 losses each year as long as we didn't get blown out.

You said "each year". If you want to change that now to an occasional 2 or 3 loss season, then go ahead, but don't spin your own words now. Your words were clear. You sound like Charles Barkley claiming he was misquoted in his own book.

 

[GonzoCane]

That "game has changed" line is pure gold(en). That GT fullback dive that our defense couldn't stop for four quarters was some real cutting edge, space-age ****.

 

[Jedi Master Cane]

How the **** is this ******* still employed?

 

[poncho0091]

Most of us are reasonable enough to understand we won't win the championship every year, but even more important most of us could probably live with 2-3 losses each year as long as we look like a contender and we lose close games against good teams and did not get run off the field.

The fck you talking about? A bad season should be 3 losses here. And that should occur very rarely. Fck those moral victories you long for.

You totally missed the point. Almost every program has the occasional 3 loss season over time and 2 losses is pretty common. This is not longing for moral victories, it's being realistic. Even Alabama has a 3 loss year in the last 5. Yes we could consider a 3 loss team a bad season, but if I asked you if you would take that 3 loss 2005 team over this trash now, what would you say? We still had a good team. It was not 2001 team, but it was a good team and people were only mad, because we expected that team to do better. Right now we expect this team to suck and 3 losses would be considered a good thing.

Loser talk. I took your words exactly as they were written. You said the fans would be happy with 2 to 3 losses each year as long as we didn't get blown out.

You said "each year". If you want to change that now to an occasional 2 or 3 loss season, then go ahead, but don't spin your own words now. Your words were clear. You sound like Charles Barkley claiming he was misquoted in his own book.

Not misquoted, but misunderstood (your fault) and incorrectly worded (my fault). Each year should have been most years or maybe even some years, but keep acting like a ***** if you want to keep missing the point of the post. If you were one of the reasonable ones I'm referring to, you'd understand the point of the post is that if we look like a contender, then we are a contender and have a shot any given year to breakthrough and win the title. When we look like a **** show, we are a **** show, and there is no chance of us winning anything worth talking about. Losing a close game or 2 generally means we are not a bad team, but just didn't do what we needed to that day. Losing by 14+ every week generally means we don't know what we're doing.

I might sound like Charles Barkley, but you sound like FOX news reaching for anything you can grasp.

 

[The Franchise]

Most of us are reasonable enough to understand we won't win the championship every year, but even more important most of us could probably live with 2-3 losses each year as long as we look like a contender and we lose close games against good teams and did not get run off the field.

The fck you talking about? A bad season should be 3 losses here. And that should occur very rarely. Fck those moral victories you long for.

You totally missed the point. Almost every program has the occasional 3 loss season over time and 2 losses is pretty common. This is not longing for moral victories, it's being realistic. Even Alabama has a 3 loss year in the last 5. Yes we could consider a 3 loss team a bad season, but if I asked you if you would take that 3 loss 2005 team over this trash now, what would you say? We still had a good team. It was not 2001 team, but it was a good team and people were only mad, because we expected that team to do better. Right now we expect this team to suck and 3 losses would be considered a good thing.

Loser talk. I took your words exactly as they were written. You said the fans would be happy with 2 to 3 losses each year as long as we didn't get blown out.

You said "each year". If you want to change that now to an occasional 2 or 3 loss season, then go ahead, but don't spin your own words now. Your words were clear. You sound like Charles Barkley claiming he was misquoted in his own book.

Not misquoted, but misunderstood (your fault) and incorrectly worded (my fault). Each year should have been most years or maybe even some years, but keep acting like a ***** if you want to keep missing the point of the post. If you were one of the reasonable ones I'm referring to, you'd understand the point of the post is that if we look like a contender, then we are a contender and have a shot any given year to breakthrough and win the title. When we look like a **** show, we are a **** show, and there is no chance of us winning anything worth talking about. Losing a close game or 2 generally means we are not a bad team, but just didn't do what we needed to that day. Losing by 14+ every week generally means we don't know what we're doing.

I might sound like Charles Barkley, but you sound like FOX news reaching for anything you can grasp.

Dumb fck. You expect people to read your mind like some dopey chick. "I didn't really mean each year like I said, and you're an ******* for not knowing that I didn't really mean what I typed. I meant some years or most years, but you should have known that." Fcking dopey chick logic. Go get a testosterone patch, fckface.

 

[poncho0091]

The fck you talking about? A bad season should be 3 losses here. And that should occur very rarely. Fck those moral victories you long for.

You totally missed the point. Almost every program has the occasional 3 loss season over time and 2 losses is pretty common. This is not longing for moral victories, it's being realistic. Even Alabama has a 3 loss year in the last 5. Yes we could consider a 3 loss team a bad season, but if I asked you if you would take that 3 loss 2005 team over this trash now, what would you say? We still had a good team. It was not 2001 team, but it was a good team and people were only mad, because we expected that team to do better. Right now we expect this team to suck and 3 losses would be considered a good thing.

Loser talk. I took your words exactly as they were written. You said the fans would be happy with 2 to 3 losses each year as long as we didn't get blown out.

You said "each year". If you want to change that now to an occasional 2 or 3 loss season, then go ahead, but don't spin your own words now. Your words were clear. You sound like Charles Barkley claiming he was misquoted in his own book.

Not misquoted, but misunderstood (your fault) and incorrectly worded (my fault). Each year should have been most years or maybe even some years, but keep acting like a ***** if you want to keep missing the point of the post. If you were one of the reasonable ones I'm referring to, you'd understand the point of the post is that if we look like a contender, then we are a contender and have a shot any given year to breakthrough and win the title. When we look like a **** show, we are a **** show, and there is no chance of us winning anything worth talking about. Losing a close game or 2 generally means we are not a bad team, but just didn't do what we needed to that day. Losing by 14+ every week generally means we don't know what we're doing.

I might sound like Charles Barkley, but you sound like FOX news reaching for anything you can grasp.

Dumb fck. You expect people to read your mind like some dopey chick. "I didn't really mean each year like I said, and you're an ******* for not knowing that I didn't really mean what I typed. I meant some years or most years, but you should have known that." Fcking dopey chick logic. Go get a testosterone patch, fckface.

No man, I expect you to read the entire post and understand the point of the post which was not about the 2-3 losses, but about us being competitive. If you're going to take the time to comment on my post, then take the time to understand what it was about.

You should go apply for FOX news, because you do a great job and reaching for your argument and taking things out of context. If you read the rest of the post, you would see I compared it to Oklahoma who loses a couple games most years, but occasionally gets into the title game or wins it. The fanbase doesn't hate stoops, because he has success and even in down years, they still look competitive. You're not an ******* for not reading minds, you're an ******* for cherry picking. If you read the 2 examples I gave you might think, oh maybe this is the point of the post, and if you weren't such an *******, you might ask if that's what I meant or even to clarify (even though 2 losses does not mean you can't get to the championship or the playoffs now). Instead like a chick on the rag you jump all over small **** without worrying about the rest of the details surrounding the statement. Next time look for the big picture.

I hate ignorant cherry pickers.