Karma finally comes back to defeat Ohio St

How?

The calls were right and honestly easy. Welcome to 2019 “ it’s the refs “ of the play is close but goes against my team. I guess it helps them sleep better.

Are you a secret Clemson fan? I don’t think anybody except for Clemson fans seriously thinks that was an incomplete pass.
 
Advertisement
Are you a secret Clemson fan? I don’t think anybody except for Clemson fans seriously thinks that was an incomplete pass.

dude watching it live it was obvious as **** , hence why the ref and the ref in the booth said it was incomplete . Literally everyone I’ve seen and talked to said it was incomplete. Sounds like you’re a secret undercover taint fan. Or smoking meth.

Both calls were right. Clemson made the plays when the game was on the line . Taint didn’t. They allowed a game winning drive on d and threw a pick on o.

Quit being the new era fan crying about bad calls every **** game. By the rules both calls were right.
 
20191228_211652.webp
 
dude watching it live it was obvious as **** , hence why the ref and the ref in the booth said it was incomplete . Literally everyone I’ve seen and talked to said it was incomplete. Sounds like you’re a secret undercover taint fan. Or smoking meth.

Both calls were right. Clemson made the plays when the game was on the line . Taint didn’t. They allowed a game winning drive on d and threw a pick on o.

Quit being the new era fan crying about bad calls every **** game. By the rules both calls were right.


The targeting call was correct, and the roughing the kicker call might have been correct, because of how wimpy football rules are today.

However, that incomplete pass call is one of the worst calls in CFB history.
 
The targeting call was correct, and the roughing the kicker call might have been correct, because of how wimpy football rules are today.

However, that incomplete pass call is one of the worst calls in CFB history.


You’re blind then. It was obvious hence why a the replay official and a forged ref both said at different times. Reece Davis was on field and said the same. Nobody but a rainy fan could see that as a catch.
 
You’re blind then. It was obvious hence why a the replay official and a forged ref both said at different times. Reece Davis was on field and said the same. Nobody but a rainy fan could see that as a catch.


The “incompletion” was called a fumble and a TD on the field. The announcers and the rules analyst also said it was a fumble. The guy in the booth was the only guy who thought it was an incomplete pass.
 
You’re blind then. It was obvious hence why a the replay official and a forged ref both said at different times. Reece Davis was on field and said the same. Nobody but a rainy fan could see that as a catch.
And Kirk Herbstreit.
 
Advertisement
The targeting call was correct, and the roughing the kicker call might have been correct, because of how wimpy football rules are today.

However, that incomplete pass call is one of the worst calls in CFB history.



You know what ? How bout stopping them ONE TIME instead of allowing an 90 yard drive in like two minutes. You know what else ? Score on your last drive like Clemson just did rather than throwing a pick.


You know what that’s called ? Taking the game and making the plays TO WIN THE GAME!!! That’s what championship teams do

Osu outplayed Clemson and played a really good game , Clemson played average and still won. Why? Because they’re a better team.

Move on sugar , y’all got one natty you didn’t deserve so be happy.
 
You’re blind then. It was obvious hence why a the replay official and a forged ref both said at different times. Reece Davis was on field and said the same. Nobody but a rainy fan could see that as a catch.

Laughable. The receiver himself knew it was a catch. That's always the tip off, to watch how the player reacts. He was desperately trying to break free so he could make a tackle on the defensive back
 
In real time speed no catch.
Slow motion it looks like a catch.

since it would have benefited taint-NO CATCH ahahahshaha
 
Ohio State had the lead and the ball with 4 minutes remaining. Instead of being aggressive on 3rd and 3 they shifted into an empty set and threw a wimpy flanker screen. Logically it was wiped out, exactly as third down screen passes are supposed to be greeted in a situation like that.

When I lived in Las Vegas it was always glaring that baseball teams that relied heaviest on bunts would lose. Football teams that relied heaviest on third down screens would lose.

Nothing has changed.

This was a talented and interesting Ohio State team. But once they resorted to a garbage third down screen pass in a pivotal situation like that I have no sympathy for them.

BTW, Scott Van Pelt during the post game show also understood that the catch was indeed a catch.
 
Advertisement
I thought the call was bullsh*t, but they always call it like that. You have to catch the ball, take 5 steps, blow your mom a kiss in the stands, and do the Heisman pose or they call it an incomplete pass.
Unless it’s UM, in which case all of the above is required for an opposing DL or OL to get called for holding.
 
The targeting call was correct, and the roughing the kicker call might have been correct, because of how wimpy football rules are today.

However, that incomplete pass call is one of the worst calls in CFB history.
Man, stop caping for the bucknuts. They don't get love here. After 01 and how they ran their mouths they deserved this and more.
 
Clemson won. If Ohio state didn’t want the referees to decide the outcome, they should have closed the door when they had the chance. There’s no excuse for letting a team come back from 16 down and than drive the field to retake the lead in the final few minutes. Clemson will beat LSU and they might even play a good game in the the process/
 
Back
Top