Just got back from Chicago-South Bend earlier...

k9cane

Senior
Joined
Nov 20, 2011
Messages
9,800
wish I would've booked another day in Chi-town, yeah, lots to do out there, fun city.... anyhoo, about the game, some thoughts:

- Anyone else die just a little bit inside when Richt lines up in the I-formation to start downs and proceeds to run the ball? He has mastered the art of putting Miami behind the chains and setting up 3rd and longs and then really exacerbating the problems of the Oline( which is very versatile in not being able to run or pass block) and a QB that isn't mobile. Also, any play with Kaaya doing the mesh point thing is a complete waste. I had endzone seats and literally the backside ends always crashes the run play because he knows Kaaya is no threat to tuck and run. JMO, Miami's best chance offensively is to go mostly shotgun spread and be an offense that passes to set up the occassional run.( And lets face it, with this line, there is no perfect system for them).

BTW, how many good offensive teams use that much I-formation anymore in todays college game?

- OK, the Oline is just a few players away from being good... those being Bryant McKinnie, Leon Searcy, Dennis Harrah and Martin Bibla. But seriously, this is the worst unit I have ever seen at Miami - and I went through the ERRickson era, which is saying something - and last year this was the same unit basically and instead of the expected improvement they've gotten (much) worse. I had a chance to drive up to the game with Peter Ariz and he is firm in his belief that at least one freshman next year( Donaldson) will start upfront at UM.

Just think about this, a 12th grader is our best lineman. That's scary, sad and funny( but not in a ha ha way).

- Richt, OK, I get it, we have holes in our roster, it's only 8 games in. But what happened to that guy who once ran 'the Fast Break' offense at FSU and produced entertaining and productive units? Yeah, absolutely the sieve upfront affects everything - no argument, here - but it's just my opinion that the way he calls a game it makes things worse. In watching other games I see QB's who are allowed to get rid of the ball early, have screen packages at their disposal, etc. This system currently looks very antiquated. Yeah, I get it, Jimmys and Joes, but does that mean we need the 2001 Miami O-line to see a productive UM offense under Richt?

I can't lie, to a certain degree it seems like the game(offensively) has passed him by a bit. Oh, and someone needs to tell him that we don't have Todd Gurley back there. Work around your weaknesses in terms of your talent, not spotlight them. One last thing about Richt, Miami seems to take an inordinate amount of TO's in the 1st and 3rd quarters and it really killed them vs NDame on their last drive, where they could grind the clock down as they only had 2 TO's. This has been a problem since the opening game it seems

- Some bright spots: Corn Elder, this guy has been our best player, performing at an All-American level. My hats off to 29. And Adrien Colbert was really physical yesterday, made some nice plays. I love our core of young players, this is what gives me hope. The guys like Ahmmon Richards, Joe Jackson, Michael Pickney, etc. They really shouldn't be asked to contribute this much but that's the situation Miami finds itself in.

- Lastly, great UM turnout despite the recent tailspin. There was a lot of orange-and-green at that stadium, regardless. And the atmosphere was very friendly, yeah, this wasn't quite as heated as 1988.

Yeah, that's all I have for now. Well, back to boxing....
 
Advertisement
"Miami's best chance offensively is to go mostly shotgun spread and be an offense that passes to set up the occassional run.( And lets face it, with this line, there is no perfect system for them). "

Great point...been saying it as well. We moved the ball well when we did this yesterday. We even had a couple runs of more than five yards once the pass opened up the run. Then Richt went back to basic runs on 1st and 2nd setting up 3rd and long.
 
We tried playing out of the gun and passing all night against VT and how well did that work for us? Richt clearly has lost a lot of faith in Kaaya and it is reflected in his play calling. Lining up in the gun is not going to change much for this offense because there are just too many issues all around with this offensive unit.
 
To be honest he has also passed out of the I as a way to change things up but the online still sucks not giving Kaaya time to throw.
 
How many good offensive teams use I formation? Bama, Michigan, Wisconsin is 3 off the top of my head and those are 3 of the best 10 teams in the country.
 
How many good offensive teams use I formation? Bama, Michigan, Wisconsin is 3 off the top of my head and those are 3 of the best 10 teams in the country.

Exactly and the other teams know they are going to run and they still do it. The difference is this Oline sucks and there isn't a sure fire just starting X and all the problems are solved.
 
Advertisement
The I formation and 1 back sets were the only things that looked promising. The touchdown blast from a basic power formation was my favorite Canes play of the season, along with the opening play at Appalachian State, an 80 yard touchdown run out of the I.

We shifted to those power looks for obvious self preservation after the mesh plays -- as you called them (good term) -- were being avalanched. As soon as we started featuring the I last night I knew the entire team would become more energized, on defense and everywhere. If we had stayed mesh it would have been a rout.

There are tons of top teams using I formation looks. Clemson converted a vital 4th down on an I formation pitch last night. Florida State likewise uses the I effectively, last night and always. The long touchdown pass to Dalvin Cook against the Canes was from I formation. The go-ahead touchdown against Clemson last night with 3 minutes remaining was Cook from the I. Countless other examples.

The Canes committed to this RPO crap. That's the problem. Now we're reluctantly and tentatively switching to styles that should have been the base all along.
 
The I formation and 1 back sets were the only things that looked promising. The touchdown blast from a basic power formation was my favorite Canes play of the season, along with the opening play at Appalachian State, an 80 yard touchdown run out of the I.

We shifted to those power looks for obvious self preservation after the mesh plays -- as you called them (good term) -- were being avalanched. As soon as we started featuring the I last night I knew the entire team would become more energized, on defense and everywhere. If we had stayed mesh it would have been a rout.

There are tons of top teams using I formation looks. Clemson converted a vital 4th down on an I formation pitch last night. Florida State likewise uses the I effectively, last night and always. The long touchdown pass to Dalvin Cook against the Canes was from I formation. The go-ahead touchdown against Clemson last night with 3 minutes remaining was Cook from the I. Countless other examples.

The Canes committed to this RPO crap. That's the problem. Now we're reluctantly and tentatively switching to styles that should have been the base all along.

Preach brother preach. The play calling has been too predictable, the rpo sucks.
 
How many good offensive teams use I formation? Bama, Michigan, Wisconsin is 3 off the top of my head and those are 3 of the best 10 teams in the country.

Bama in i form much lately? They run out of shotgun and do a bunch of read option stuff nowadays
 
How many good offensive teams use I formation? Bama, Michigan, Wisconsin is 3 off the top of my head and those are 3 of the best 10 teams in the country.

Bama in i form much lately? They run out of shotgun and do a bunch of read option stuff nowadays

Yeah, to Saban's credit, he has evolved his offense while still keeping his base philosophy. Just look at the QB they have now..
 
Advertisement
The I formation and 1 back sets were the only things that looked promising. The touchdown blast from a basic power formation was my favorite Canes play of the season, along with the opening play at Appalachian State, an 80 yard touchdown run out of the I.

We shifted to those power looks for obvious self preservation after the mesh plays -- as you called them (good term) -- were being avalanched. As soon as we started featuring the I last night I knew the entire team would become more energized, on defense and everywhere. If we had stayed mesh it would have been a rout.

There are tons of top teams using I formation looks. Clemson converted a vital 4th down on an I formation pitch last night. Florida State likewise uses the I effectively, last night and always. The long touchdown pass to Dalvin Cook against the Canes was from I formation. The go-ahead touchdown against Clemson last night with 3 minutes remaining was Cook from the I. Countless other examples.

The Canes committed to this RPO crap. That's the problem. Now we're reluctantly and tentatively switching to styles that should have been the base all along.

hold on, that 80 yard TD vs App St, wasn't that a play that was stuffed and Walton broke a tackle? That wasn't some exhibition of physical football but a great individual play vs an overmatched opponent..
 
Relax everyone. The playbook is opening up vs Pitt.

Hopefully he sets the playbook in fire and starts over. I put my head in my palm every ****n time we came out in the I formation.

I was at the game as well and the canes contingent was making the stadium ours during the 27 point run.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top