forums

Jordan should be cut, he dropped a pass

252cane said:
Dont call me kid. Im a grown *** man. And reading comprehension is key. I said i could be smarter than richt because being a coach doesn't mean he is right about everything.

And i would start the qb who can get the ball to my playmakers. I don't care who knows the entire playbook. Put something together for that qb to be successful.
Click to expand...

Not possible. You can't be "smarter than Richt" when it comes to football.

Your premise is flawed because no person on earth is right about everything all the time; even as experts in a given field.
That's like saying you're smarter than a rocket scientist because you got 1 question correct that they got wrong, but you scored a 2% when they scored 98% overall.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
Coach Macho said:
Sounds great. Let's hope so.
Click to expand...

Well, there’s three guys with good arm talent right behind him on the roster.

Hopefully, they’re pushing him, or one steps up.

Unless his head is in the wrong place, or his mechanics are fūcked beyond repair, an improvement is supposed to happen for second year starters.

I have no way of knowing what will happen, I just know what SHOULD happen.

And if Rosier shlts the bed, Richt has options this year, unlike last year.
 
JgDaCane said:
Question & not being a ****. Why do we assume the o-line will be better?
Click to expand...

1. Experience in the system (another year)
2. Player Development: another year of nutrition, S&C
3. Personal maturity, mentally and physically
4. More Depth
5. Better competition
6. Richt's reports
7. Joe Jackson -- listen from 1:35

via @YouTube
 
Last edited:
Mahoney-Pearson said:
Not possible. You can't be smarter than Richt when it comes to football.

Your premise is flawed because no person on earth is right about everything all the time; even when they are experts in a given field.
That's like saying you're smarter than someone because you got 1 question correct that they got wrong, but you scored a 30% when they scored 99% overall.
Click to expand...
No both of your premises is flawed. You cant speak on what i know and how much i know.
 
Advertisement
Whether you like Rosier or not, he broke records last season and guided us to a 10-3 record. There is expectation, as there should be, that he elevates his game, which includes his completion %, while decreasing his INT’s (7 of which game in 3 games).

If Richt believes him to be the best starter we’ve got for 2018, then let’s roll with him, but he better produce just as well as he did in2017; or better as we have too much talent at the WR/RB/TE positions for this offense not to hum better this season. Most of the players are back and have another year under their belts and Richt’s system.

I’m of the thought he can excel this year, and that could mean becoming a better game manager and not the one we rely upon to truly make this offense great. It could be having a power rushing attack that we can go over top with when defenses are either gassed or not expecting it. Either way, I expect to see the offense working in sync better, passes ; when necessary, are on target. If Rosier is that player...suit him up.
 
252cane said:
Why do these issues only effect rosier so negatively? These offensive line problems you bring up has been going on for a long time.
Click to expand...


because we're talking about Rosier's play in 2017 in comparison to the rest of the ACC QBs, and no other ACC QB played played behind Miami's O-line...
 
According to the post practice pressers, Rosier threw for over 70% today and Homer says the most improved thing about Malik has been his accuracy.
 
Advertisement
Coach Macho said:
I'm guessing this is your way of defending Rosier?

Makes zero sense since the frustration with Rosier isn't based off of one practice clip but a whole body of work. If Rosier was a 60% passer and occasionally threw a ball into the dirt during practice then nobody would say ****. I promise you that.

If Jordan starts dropping balls routinely then I'm sure he'll get the same treatment.
Click to expand...
This comes with a major Caveat because he WASNT a 60% passer, but, if I recall there were something like 30 odd drop passes, which if caught put him over 60%, plus he had an injured AC joint from UNC till Clemson. So I think he can get up to 60% all things being equal.
 
OriginalCanesCanesCanes said:
Rosier is what he is. He doesn’t need to be defended.

Let me just say, there’s a decent chance he could be a 60% passer this year, and he’s still going to get majorly dogged, even if he is.

Going from 54% (2017) to 60% or over, when a college QB transitions from his first to second year starting is pretty typical. This type of improvement happens all the time, in fact it probably happens in at least better than 50% of the cases.
Click to expand...


If Rosier gets above 58% completion percentage and keeps his INT's in the single digits, the Canes have a strong chance of making the playoff.

As you noted above, that's not a herculean task, rather that would just be some solid improvement from year one to year two as a starter.
 
Back
Top