forums

It was never about the money

GuptaKnows said:
Richt gets all the credit for good hires, none of the blame for the bad ones. Richt gets all the credit for the wins, none of the blame for the losses. I've never seen a coach, who hasn't won a title, get defended like Richt does in my life.
Click to expand...

Which board have you been reading?
 
Advertisement
kryptonite said:
I never said any of it wasn't Richt's fault or that we shouldn't win the coastal all the time, just that we overachieved last year. Pointing out all those faults of Richt's only makes my point for me. We overachieved to win 10 despite Richt being unable to develop a QB or motivate guys on game day or call plays designed to work with what we actually had, not what he wished we had. If you don't think winning the coastal despite all that is overachieving, than what is?
Click to expand...

Beating Clemson definitely would have been overachieving. Beating LSU would have as well. What Dantonio and Chryst(even Leach to a lesser extent) consistently do is over achieving. Beat teams with more talent. That is over achieving. We are so used to underachieving between Coker, Golden, Shannon, and Richt the one time we actually do what we are supposed to do we call it overachieving.
 
jackedaround said:
Diaz just wanted out. He knows the ss richt is sinking and doesnt want to be out of a job come next november. Plus he figures he will never have a better chance to make the jump to HC. Very rare to have a top 5 defense two years in a row.

I'm disappointed but I understand his thought process. What is more troubling is our best coach just left.
Click to expand...

He would have been the next HC here.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top