forums

Is this what Richt's offense was supposed to look like ?

Trescerocinco said:
Enos is night and day from richt. He was successful at Arkansas with way less talent than we recruit annually. Not ready to crown him or anything like that but I am 100 percent positive that the offense will improve
Click to expand...

I’m all for someone who uses motion and shifts to get presnap advantages versus me calling out out plays pre-snap and being right more than wrong.
 
Advertisement
Judging only by the highlights u would think that is the AC offense. Definitely not west coast.
 
Calvin said:
What made this offense work some because it had alot of players from coach shannon's best recruitining class and that was his 2010 recruiting class, why, because it was the most physical class. I stated that not long after that class signed, i always thought it as ridiculous that that 2008 recruiting class was ranked #1, with a bunch of widereceivers and linebackers in it, was always comical to me, but was a prime example of how alot of these nerd recruiting sites dont know a dam thing about football!
Click to expand...

2010 had like 16 busts in it. It was abysmal...
 
BeachCanes said:
Still think Stephen Morris should have been rated higher as a potential NFL QB coming out of college. Don't see why he didn't have a mid round grade. What do you guys think? Isn't footwork one of the more correctable traits?

Also that video reminded me how physically weak Stacey Coley was; underrated route runner though.
Click to expand...

The in jury killed Morris’ stock.

He was really good deep but not as effective in the intermediate game iirc.
 
ThomasM said:
Not with the plays Richt called. He'd have been better than anything else we saw, by a mile, but Richt couldn't call his way out of a wet paper bag.
Click to expand...

Steven would have hit a lot of those deep shots Richt called and completely changed the momentum from game 1.

Imagine Ste Mo throwing those one on one bombs in the first half against LSU instead of Rosier.

The outcome would have been COMPLETELY different.
 
I'm a USF grad. My frat bros gave me **** for being in Canes gear. I think it was Fisch last season or Coley's first with well designed offense. Holtz was USF HC and he was horrible as was the team. With a real OC/QB coach and well designed offense we will be a new team this year.
 
Advertisement
305to954 said:
Back in “08 we needed a bunch of LBs and WRs so idek how you’d consider that class “comical”. Based on the way rankings work That class was deserving of the number 1 spot. What hurt that class the most was the absolute flop in classes after. 09 and 10 were terrible
Click to expand...

You should pay attention to actual football more and not the hyped up recruiting class rankings, and also, you should slow down when you reading, itll help you comprehend what i wrote better. So let me help you, first off, i didnt say "the class was comical" i said the class ranking was. If you feel the 08 class was deserving of the so called #1 class ranking, you sir dont know football. Especially with you saying this "09 and 10 were terrible, lol, you sir should not post as a clown, you should go and see how many players from the 09 and 10 recruiting classes became nfl starters, compared to that 08 class, as well compare the contracts of the players in the nfl from the 09 & 10 recruiting classes to those from 08. Once you do that, we should expect your next post on this board to be a whole lot smarter next time!
 
Calvin said:
What made this offense work some because it had alot of players from coach shannon's best recruitining class and that was his 2010 recruiting class, why, because it was the most physical class. I stated that not long after that class signed, i always thought it as ridiculous that that 2008 recruiting class was ranked #1, with a bunch of widereceivers and linebackers in it, was always comical to me, but was a prime example of how alot of these nerd recruiting sites dont know a dam thing about football!
Click to expand...
U said the classes ranking was comical..which would lead anybody with fourth grade literacy skills to infer your opinion of the 2008 class as..comical. I assume that’s your post judgement on that class and what they accomplished as a unit. IM SAYING you can’t do that giving the fact the classes that directly followed were absolutely abysmal. Not because of the talent or ranking but the attrition that happened
 
Advertisement
Calvin said:
You should pay attention to actual football more and not the hyped up recruiting class rankings, and also, you should slow down when you reading, itll help you comprehend what i wrote better. So let me help you, first off, i didnt say "the class was comical" i said the class ranking was. If you feel the 08 class was deserving of the so called #1 class ranking, you sir dont know football. Especially with you saying this "09 and 10 were terrible, lol, you sir should not post as a clown, you should go and see how many players from the 09 and 10 recruiting classes became nfl starters, compared to that 08 class, as well compare the contracts of the players in the nfl from the 09 & 10 recruiting classes to those from 08. Once you do that, we should expect your next post on this board to be a whole lot smarter next time!
Click to expand...
Maybe you should realize that u don’t have success as a program Off 4 players in a class getting to the league with 5 other never playing, the remaining make zero impact (2009)..the 2010 class had 12 players not even finish as canes..the 08 class might not have had players in the league but majority of that class finished and made a far better impact
 
305to954 said:
Maybe you should realize that u don’t have success as a program Off 4 players in a class getting to the league with 5 other never playing, the remaining make zero impact (2009)..the 2010 class had 12 players not even finish as canes..the 08 class might not have had players in the league but majority of that class finished and made a far better impact
Click to expand...

Once again, you should stick to posting facts and whole Truth's, dont use to delusion and emotions to try and defend your points, it shows weakness. Again, the 2010 class was shannon's best class, the facts speak for themselves. You losing more credibilty if you seriously are still tried to twist my words in regards to the 08 class ranking being comical.
 
305to954 said:
Maybe you should realize that u don’t have success as a program Off 4 players in a class getting to the league with 5 other never playing, the remaining make zero impact (2009)..the 2010 class had 12 players not even finish as canes..the 08 class might not have had players in the league but majority of that class finished and made a far better impact
Click to expand...
Lmao yooo the 2010 class had 12 signees either never see the field, not qualify, or transfer out..I think u getting classes mixed up
https://247sports.com/college/miami/Season/2010-Football/Commits/... you going off what like 5-8 individuals did in the league over 2 recruiting classes as a measure of success for a program..which is short sighted and dumb..under Shannon the best team was 09..the best players from that squad was from the 08 class..then even 2013 the next decent year the best players on that team was from the 2012 class
 
Back
Top