I would like to know the same thing here. Because if the ACC has not appealed this, I just don’t know what to say anymore about this conference. It’s as clear as day It wasn’t targeting so what the **** is going on here!Anyone hear anything on this? Did they actually appeal for Lucas??
Well, if that’s true, and it has been appealed, it would be nice to get an answer on it soon?I thought I heard on Alex Donno's podcast they did but he thought since the targeting criteria is so subjective it would be hard to overturn
Well, if that’s true, and it has been appealed, it would be nice to get an answer on it soon?
www.ncaa.org
After posting around a bunch of lawyers for 15 years I know enough about governing bodies not wanting to mess with precedents to know Lucas won’t be available until the 2nd halfBoth “schools and conferences”, per policy may appeal. The standard to overturn a targeting call suspension is whether the NCAA national coordinator of officials deems it “clearly obvious” that the call was wrong.
Don’t hold your breath.
![]()
Appeals process approved for football players called for targeting in the second half - NCAA.org
The NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel on Wednesday approved football measures intended to strengthen the accuracy of the targeting rule, limit blocking below thewww.ncaa.org
After posting around a bunch of lawyers for 15 years I know enough about governing bodies not wanting to mess with precedents to know Lucas won’t be available until the 2nd half
After posting around a bunch of lawyers for 15 years I know enough about governing bodies not wanting to mess with precedents to know Lucas won’t be available until the 2nd half
I just wanted to make a lawyer jokeIn reality, it’s all politics. As an example, precedent has not fared well in the Supreme Court of late.
Now - to be clear - you are absolutely correct in a traditional historical context. But things have changed a lot over the last decade.
IMO Lucas playing or not playing the first half will depend upon who has more juice with the deciders.
I thought I heard on Alex Donno's podcast they did but he thought since the targeting criteria is so subjective it would be hard to overturn
So did Ohio State and BYU. But Notre Dame and Michigan have each lost appeals. There is precedent to have it overturned, but sadly that precedent is rooted in subjective findings that give me zero confidence it will result in Lucas’ suspension being overturned.SEC got a couple overturned last year.
So did Ohio State and BYU. But Notre Dame and Michigan have each lost appeals. There is precedent to have it overturned, but sadly that precedent is rooted in subjective findings that give me zero confidence it will result in Lucas’ suspension being overturned.
Hopefully, I’m wrong.