KrazyCane
SAVAGE
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2016
- Messages
- 12,109
This just flat out isn’t true
All you have to do is turn on your critical thinking skills and use an ounce of logic to see that It’s true.
This just flat out isn’t true
You mean Iowa with the single, largest concentrated site in t he country which has resulted in the closure of 10% of the meat supply at that and other plants?
Pushing the envelope and making others **** or get off the pot. Iowa hasn't been affected by the virus nearly as much as others which may have led to this decision. How does this affect other schools?
IMO, very foolish. I'm from Iowa and I have family members there. Just turn to any channel and see all the outbreaks in all the plants there. I know from family members that work there. Iowa has over 7,000 cases and I can tell you they're barely testing the population. The state has 3 million people. Florida has nearly 22 million. So, that's like Iowa having over 50,000 cases and nearly a 50% higher rate than Florida. Their rate of infection is moving to the top 5 in the nation. At 50,000 cases factoring Iowa's population to Florida's population of 22 million, Iowa would equal California's(49,840) who has a population of 40 million. I believe Iowa hasn't even hit its peak.
My sister said very few people took it serious. Very few were wearing masks just 2 weeks ago thinking it wasn't going to hit them as bad since they were fine while the Coasts were suffering. She wore a mask very early on as she has immune deficiencies. She's cussed out many a people for getting too close to her not social distancing.
With that said, I believe a lot of people are in this false sense that the outbreak is over because of some arbitrary date on the calendar. We still have very little testing and NO state has passed the President's guideline of 14 days of consecutive decreases. I fear things are going to get worse as we see people returning to normal activities herding together unprotected.
What are you talking about? There is literally 0 data thats supports that number. The most aggressive estimates I’ve seen put it at about 3%.All you have to do is turn on your critical thinking skills and use an ounce of logic to see that It’s true.
My condolences and deepest sympathy to you and your friends Rell. When this hits close to home, chit gets real. My take is we gotta start somewhere with a common sense and measured approach. Setting a target and seeing if can be hit may be an incentive for all concerned to do the right things to insure it can happen. We've got a month or so to watch closely and see how it all shakes out. If they need to drop back and punt, hopefully they'll do just that.
Valid point. Obviously, the close proximity of the workers to each other was a contributing factor to the spread being so concentrated and widespread. Thus the shutdown. My understanding is they are working on mitigation to reduce the close proximity of the workers and doing extensive cleaning before re-opening the plant.You mean Iowa with the single, largest concentrated site in t he country which has resulted in the closure of 10% of the meat supply at that and other plants?
If they decide to start the season one case won't shut it down. You cant enter into something thinking things are gonna go perfectly and just as you planned. They're gonna have to accept someone might get it and they'll get isolated and anyone they passed it to gets isolated too. There is no other way to do it if they decide to start.Great idea until the first positive case on the team/coaching staff etc. and then it all gets shut down. College football isn't happening this season. Optics optics optics.
It's encouraging and inspiring to see how much is going on - many companies, scientists, and others are all over it trying to come up with therapeutics and vaccines.Thanks bro, and I totally agree w this. We can’t let this chit run our lives, but we gotta take measured steps.
I desperately want things to get back to normal, but I also want all of us to be smart about it, and think about tomorrow, and not just today. I know they are working hard on procedures & vaccinations, and also read Oxford University seems to be making great progress on a vaccine as we speak.
Numer1CanesFan wrote:
IMO, very foolish. I'm from Iowa and I have family members there. Just turn to any channel and see all the outbreaks in all the plants there. I know from family members that work there. Iowa has over 7,000 cases and I can tell you they're barely testing the population. The state has 3 million people. Florida has nearly 22 million. So, that's like Iowa having over 50,000 cases and nearly a 50% higher rate than Florida. Their rate of infection is moving to the top 5 in the nation. At 50,000 cases factoring Iowa's population to Florida's population of 22 million, Iowa would equal California's(49,840) who has a population of 40 million. I believe Iowa hasn't even hit its peak.
My sister said very few people took it serious. Very few were wearing masks just 2 weeks ago thinking it wasn't going to hit them as bad since they were fine while the Coasts were suffering. She wore a mask very early on as she has immune deficiencies. She's cussed out many a people for getting too close to her not social distancing.
With that said, I believe a lot of people are in this false sense that the outbreak is over because of some arbitrary date on the calendar. We still have very little testing and NO state has passed the President's guideline of 14 days of consecutive decreases. I fear things are going to get worse as we see people returning to normal activities herding together unprotected.
Rell this isn't as bad as the flu and it's just being hyped up. stop being a chicken little rell.....(all of this is sarcasm)
Genuinely curious where you are getting these antibody testing numbers?Actually, Iowa probably has over 100k cases because antibody testing conservatively shows about 15x as many people had/have it than have gotten a positive test. Of those 100kish that have/had it in Iowa, about 50%ish have/had no symptoms. Another 47-48% have/had mild to moderate symptoms and didn't seek hospitalization. About 2-3% have/had cases requiring hospitalization. Of the 2-3% with severe cases, almost all (not all, but almost all statistically) are people like your sister with immune deficiencies and the elderly (disproportionately in nursing homes).
If they decide to start the season one case won't shut it down. You cant enter into something thinking things are gonna go perfectly and just as you planned. They're gonna have to accept someone might get it and they'll get isolated and anyone they passed it to gets isolated too. There is no other way to do it if they decide to start.
Genuinely curious where you are getting these antibody testing numbers?
Sure - those tests are encouraging, but the sample size is not necessarily representative.There have been lots of them already. You can Google the LA study, University of Miami study, Delaware **** study, France high school study. There was one in Germany. The Santa Clara Stanford study has been criticized as an outlier, and that one indicated an even bigger spread of the virus.
Sure - those tests are encouraging, but the sample size is not necessarily representative.
Don’t you think there should be a national coordinated antibody testing effort to confirm?
Rell don't talk logic mane.....It's been outlawed.I think we’ll make progress. Problem is, we tried to dumb it down, to stop panic. If we took more serious, like in 2019 when reports started to show this new strain was different, then we would be way ahead by now.
I think that would be great. In the meantime, there has been a lot of consistency in the findings of the various small scale studies. 15x seems to be a reasonably conservative estimate.