forums

Interesting Stat

Fort_Lauderdale954 said:
Losers always make excuses....3 years and we have yet to have a top 50 offense under this WOAT Offensive coordinator. 93rd overall and 108th in passing .... the teams below us in passing offense are probably military academies and Georgia Tech
Click to expand...
as mentioned, the qb play and the many injuries to our best offensive players played a big part in that.
 
Advertisement
Fort_Lauderdale954 said:
Losers always make excuses....3 years and we have yet to have a top 50 offense under this WOAT Offensive coordinator. 93rd overall and 108th in passing .... the teams below us in passing offense are probably military academies and Georgia Tech
Click to expand...



Losers act like everything was better in the past. That team wasn't better than what we have this year, but that's not the point. The point is that Richt can't coach his way to even decent offensive numbers, there's no need to make up a fictional super-team from the past to illustrate the point.
 
kryptonite said:
Hey Captain Revisionist...were you watching any games in 2016?

Nobody was singing Kaaya's praises back then. Berrios was a JAG. Coley? Couldn't stay healthy for more than 5 minutes at a time. Herdon? Kept hearing he was great, but he hadn't done anything yet. Walton was slow and had poor vision. And let's not even start on the OL and their ability to keep Kaaya safe. Njoku's the only one who looked like a star at that point.
Click to expand...
That’s his point.
 
1mg of Epi said:
That’s his point.
Click to expand...

If that was his point he's a terrible communicator. He said we had those players and still couldn't crack the top 50. Sounds to me like he thinks those were great players and Richt mismanaged them. While Richt did mismanage them, he's overstating how good those guys were that year. You were here, you know nobody had anything good to say about Kaaya, and the other guys were getting a lot of criticism as well. Nobody thought that was a very good team at the time.
 
Fort_Lauderdale954 said:
Losers always make excuses....3 years and we have yet to have a top 50 offense under this WOAT Offensive coordinator. 93rd overall and 108th in passing .... the teams below us in passing offense are probably military academies and Georgia Tech
Click to expand...
you are correct. and its also important to see who had a better passing offense than Miami. Coastal Carolina and Texas State were both better for example. Mork must be so proud. #108 out of 129 teams. 177.3 yards per game...... impressive as ****
 
1mg of Epi said:
Until u look at the O pre rosier and injuries, and Also post rosier.
Click to expand...
U sure?

2017-18 total offensive rank per game as season goes on(our weekly rank and our opponent that week):
23 BCC
13 TOL
6 Duke
11 FSU
27 Gtech
20 Cuse
21 NC
24 VTech
25 NDame
30 UVA
35 Ptt
44 Clem
58 Wisky

Pretty consistent right up to the last 3-4 games when the losses on the offensive side were simply too much for an average (at best)QB to overcome.
You're clearly wrong or were watching the wrong team.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mike Thot said:
the offense has been decimated by injuries to its best players. and, QB play has stunk (probably at least partially related).

getting healthy and finding a leader at QB solves these probs in a hurry.
Click to expand...
I have to ask ...pardon me id it's a stupid question,.. But...does having healthy players change the playbook? Does a good QB, make a QB coach good? Does healthy players make the offensive linemen block better, pick up blitzes better? Is it even remotely possible, that a lack of coaching ability, is being reflected, by really good athletes? Ever ask yourself, why a "jag" in college, gets drafted, and balls out?,.. He didnt buy talent at the local sporting good store!! Guess you never considered how a roster full of less talented players, managed to solidly hold our offense to a whopping 14 pts a game average for **** near a half a dozen games? Our player personnelis only a small fraction of our issues,
 
Advertisement
kryptonite said:
If that was his point he's a terrible communicator. He said we had those players and still couldn't crack the top 50. Sounds to me like he thinks those were great players and Richt mismanaged them. While Richt did mismanage them, he's overstating how good those guys were that year. You were here, you know nobody had anything good to say about Kaaya, and the other guys were getting a lot of criticism as well. Nobody thought that was a very good team at the time.
Click to expand...

Yea maybe I’ll go reread it lol
 
kryptonite said:
If that was his point he's a terrible communicator. He said we had those players and still couldn't crack the top 50. Sounds to me like he thinks those were great players and Richt mismanaged them. While Richt did mismanage them, he's overstating how good those guys were that year. You were here, you know nobody had anything good to say about Kaaya, and the other guys were getting a lot of criticism as well. Nobody thought that was a very good team at the time.
Click to expand...
Actually Kaaya was projected as a first round pick under Coley, think about that. After one year with Rorcht, lulz
 
Oicu812 said:
I have to ask ...pardon me id it's a stupid question,.. But...does having healthy players change the playbook? Does a good QB, make a QB coach good? Does healthy players make the offensive linemen block better, pick up blitzes better? Is it even remotely possible, that a lack of coaching ability, is being reflected, by really good athletes? Ever ask yourself, why a "jag" in college, gets drafted, and balls out?,.. He didnt buy talent at the local sporting good store!! Guess you never considered how a roster full of less talented players, managed to solidly hold our offense to a whopping 14 pts a game average for **** near a half a dozen games? Our player personnelis only a small fraction of our issues,
Click to expand...
stopped reading after "does having healthy players change the playbook". Uh, of course it does holy ****.
 
Mike Thot said:
U sure?

2017-18 total offensive rank per game as season goes on:
23
13
6
11
27
20
21
24
25
30
35
44
58

Pretty consistent right up to the last 3-4 games when the losses on the offensive side were simply too much for an average (at best)QB to overcome.
You're clearly wrong or were watching the wrong team.
Click to expand...

Or you’re looking at NonP5 teams which were earlier in the season.

Nothing about the offense changes as the season went on, which is why pity knew exactly what was coming every alignment and LSU didn’t.
 
1mg of Epi said:
Or you’re looking at NonP5 teams which were earlier in the season.

Nothing about the offense changes as the season went on, which is why pity knew exactly what was coming every alignment and LSU didn’t.
Click to expand...
lmao...you can't be serious. you think we played non power 5 for 10 weeks? lolololol
i'll go back and edit the teams we played each week to help you out
 
Mike Thot said:
lmao...you can't be serious. you think we played non power 5 for 10 weeks? lolololol
i'll go back and edit the teams we played each week to help you out
Click to expand...
Oy vey.
It’s alright dude. U don’t get it, and u don’t have to get it.
 
Mike Thot said:
stopped reading after "does having healthy players change the playbook". Uh, of course it does holy ****.
Click to expand...
Look at our last few recruiting classes? Tell me why we have such a talent issue, that losing a player here and there means we only can use 8 plays out this 30 year old playbook? As our players go down, does our playbook get older? Every team has injuries!!!...Every team!! Why is our the only one that those injuries couldn't be overcome, or schemes around??
 
Advertisement
1mg of Epi said:
Oy vey.
It’s alright dude. U don’t get it, and u don’t have to get it.
Click to expand...
You just mentioned that the reason we were solid offensively for the first 9-10 games of 2017-18 season is because we didn't play power 5 opponents during that time period. You see how fantastically absurd that is right?
 
kryptonite said:
If that was his point he's a terrible communicator. He said we had those players and still couldn't crack the top 50. Sounds to me like he thinks those were great players and Richt mismanaged them. While Richt did mismanage them, he's overstating how good those guys were that year. You were here, you know nobody had anything good to say about Kaaya, and the other guys were getting a lot of criticism as well. Nobody thought that was a very good team at the time.
Click to expand...
I mean all we hear from Richt apologists is that Rosier and injuries is the only thing keeping us from being a great offense....well we had two nfl TE’s... an NFL RB....a freshman all American WR plus Coley and Berrios who both got drafted and a QB who got drafted and was looked at as a 2nd-3rd round pick before the richts showed up. While not world beaters, I’m not sure Richt will ever be able to recruit much better players than that here...so All of that and we still couldn’t crack the top 50 on offense...that’s sad
 
HamburgerSV said:
I mean all we hear from Richt apologists is that Rosier and injuries is the only thing keeping us from being a great offense....well we had two nfl TE’s... an NFL RB....a freshman all American WR plus Coley and Berrios who both got drafted and a QB who got drafted and was looked at as a 2nd-3rd round pick before the richts showed up. While not world beaters, I’m not sure Richt will ever be able to recruit much better players than that here...so All of that and we still couldn’t crack the top 50 on offense...that’s sad
Click to expand...
In 2017-18 we were much much better than top 50 until the injuries mounted during the last 3 games of the year.
 
Back
Top