- Joined
- Dec 30, 2012
- Messages
- 16,298
Someone show this to Shanny
He's a fan of cheating though.
He's making sure The Bengals are doing their job.He's a fan of cheating though.
He uses analytics but he just does it in his head
If your not cheating, your not trying hard enoughHe's a fan of cheating though.
“The reason we got beat is cause we can’t tackle” I don’t know man that sounds pretty manny Diaz to me.
Lol...Except one is maybe the greatest mind to ever walk a football sideline and the other well...He became the first head coach in the history of college football to loser 3 games as 14+ chalk (and won by 5 in another as 27 point chalk and lost another as 9 chalk) in the same season.
If a guy decided to break down the most efficient technique to tackle a ball carrier, and broke it down with numbers and facts a coach would be dumb not to implement that If the numbers and facts back it.I think the message Belichick is sending is fundamentally correct. However, there are at least two scenarios where analytics make a ton of sense:
If you have the resources to perform analytics, it should definitely be done. Emphasizing that over basic fundamentals (like tackling) is an error though & that is essentially what Bill was saying.
- Game management decisions (like going for it on fourth down -- which typically is the correct answer); and
- Understanding opponents tendencies. It can really help coaches better prepare their players, if an analyst (together with software) identifies that on 3rd down & long in the redzone opponents typically either (for example): (1) throw to their TE down the middle or (2) their leading WR on a fade to the right side of the endzone.