reg
Sophomore
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2014
- Messages
- 3,842
Lol at threads now turning into a "transparency conspiracy agenda." Since the videos or Richt's interview and press conference dropped last night, the "doom and gloomers" have showed up in full force, which has derailed the purpose/topics of the threads. With that being said,..........
Dear gloom and doomers,
First of all, this is not Richt's first rodeo. The conspiracy regarding why he was vague, should have been debunked the second he referenced not wanting to tip LSU off with any news. Richt, though he is very straightforward, is also a master at balancing "truth" with "coach speak".
Every coach, especially Richt, does not mind talking about their teams deficiencies in a post practice or post scrimmage interview because they know the opposing coaches are smart enough to not take anything from a coach speaking about his team's "flaws". David Aranda is not over in Baton Rouge thinking, "based on Mark's post 1st scrimmage interview, Richt does not feel good about his running game."
The same exact principle is in play when a coach (Richt) speaks glowingly in a weekly press conference about an opponent such as Savannah St. or Bethune Cookman. Richt is going to praise the **** out of Savannah St. during the week two press conference. Their coaches are not going to think to themselves, "Well, it looks like Richt thinks that we are disciplined in our gap integrity, we better be prepared for Miami to call a bunch of outside run plays."
Coaches, at least the good ones, only really use interviews for one primary reason,....it's a way to motivate his players. It has nothing to do with tipping off an opponent or hiding info from fans. Coaches have to keep players motivated/level headed (mentioning all of the flaws) but at the same time keep the players confidence high (sprinkle in praise about a unit/player).
The bytch'n about the "lack of info" is f'ucking ridiculous!
Dear gloom and doomers,
First of all, this is not Richt's first rodeo. The conspiracy regarding why he was vague, should have been debunked the second he referenced not wanting to tip LSU off with any news. Richt, though he is very straightforward, is also a master at balancing "truth" with "coach speak".
Every coach, especially Richt, does not mind talking about their teams deficiencies in a post practice or post scrimmage interview because they know the opposing coaches are smart enough to not take anything from a coach speaking about his team's "flaws". David Aranda is not over in Baton Rouge thinking, "based on Mark's post 1st scrimmage interview, Richt does not feel good about his running game."
The same exact principle is in play when a coach (Richt) speaks glowingly in a weekly press conference about an opponent such as Savannah St. or Bethune Cookman. Richt is going to praise the **** out of Savannah St. during the week two press conference. Their coaches are not going to think to themselves, "Well, it looks like Richt thinks that we are disciplined in our gap integrity, we better be prepared for Miami to call a bunch of outside run plays."
Coaches, at least the good ones, only really use interviews for one primary reason,....it's a way to motivate his players. It has nothing to do with tipping off an opponent or hiding info from fans. Coaches have to keep players motivated/level headed (mentioning all of the flaws) but at the same time keep the players confidence high (sprinkle in praise about a unit/player).
The bytch'n about the "lack of info" is f'ucking ridiculous!