I'm confused. MICHIGAN AND UF RANKED?

[MetiSkeemz]

Saying UiF SHOULDN'T be ranked does not equal saying UM SHOULD. The only reason UiF is ranked is because a junk Tennessee team started the season completely overranked. Funny how that seems to happen every year with a multitude of $EC teams, eh? Kinda keeps em cycling into rankings and keeping those high rankings, huh? Ain't no bad losses in the mighty $EC....we won't allow it!

You sir deserve a crisp new dollar bill. NEVER did I say Miami should be ranked to you jumping conclusion MFers. I said I was confused as to why Uf and Michigan were. They started the season ranked AHEAD of Miami at 30 REGARDLESS of the fact they not only didn't win a bowl game, but weren't invited after winning 5 games last season. What basis are pre season rankings made off of and who determines them? Used tithing it was returning talent and previous schedule but the Vaunted SEC west went 2-5 in bowl games and put dudes in the league so what's the basis?

 

[Tad Footeball]

LOL@ claiming SEC bias is the reason UF is ranked 25th, dead last in the poll. Really? And there are currently 3 teams with losses from other conferences still ahead of them, please check out who they've played so far and then argue that UF shouldn't be ranked. Actually, I'll do it for you.

USC: Arkansas St. (0-4), Idaho (1-3), Stanford (3-1), Arizona St.(2-2)
Wisconsin: Bama (3-1), Miami (OH) (1-3), Troy (1-2) , Hawaii (2-2)
Stanford: Northwestern (4-0), UCF (0-4), USC (3-1), Oregon St. (2-2)

Only Stanford's schedule looks remotely challenging and then when you analyze the fact that two of Northwestern's wins have come against Ball St. and Eastern Illinois or two of USC's wins are against Arkansas St. and Idaho, it suddenly isn't that impressive. Oregon is sitting at 2-2, just lost at home by 40, and is still ranked. But yea, SEC bias!

Shut up, Gata. Toledo is undefeated AND won a road game in your mighty conference. Giving them that 25 spot would have taken a little shine off of your "marquee" matchup with Ole **** though too and we simply can't have that. Enjoy your soon to be "dropped from ranking" designation.

You really got me there! Don't get mad at me because your argument is idiotic. I don't think anyone expects UF to stay there after this weekend, that doesn't make that porst of yours anymore valid. SEC bias guysm!!?*

Typical Gata/$EC logic. "There ain't no $EC bias! Auburn deserved to enter the year ranked 6th. Arky, Tennessee and Mizzou all deserved to be ranked too! Ain't that right, Finebaum? $-E-C! $-E-C!".

what team would you have in the 25th spot?

Toledo is undefeated and beat a then ranked $EC team on the road. That's more than UiF can say right now. Even Houston is also undefeated, beat Louisville on the road and blew out its other opponents.

 

[killa1storm]

What's deserve got to do with anything? See this is the type of assbackwards logic that kills me. Did Oregon 'deserve' to start out the year ranked 5th? Or are we just gonna focus on SEC teams that may have been over-ranked? Did USC deserve to start out in the top 10 after losing 4 games from the previous year and a bunch of starters? Lemme guess, you got no issues with where they were ranked right? You're obsessed with the SEC, clearly.

We fvcked you in the *** last time we played you.


View attachment 32011

OK? Look UF isn't a good team. I fully expect them to be at best 2-2 over the next 4 games, likely 1-3 and they'll be around 7-5 or 8-4 this year. That still has nothing to do with claiming a team who is 4-0 and is ranked dead last in the poll is ranked where they are because of SEC bias, it's a ridiculous argument. I could see if they had jumped into the top 15 or something, they're dead last in the **** poll LOL. Conveniently, people forget things like Auburn dropping all the way from 7 to 15 after a WIN. Granted, it was a very unimpressive win, but the point remains the same. Or the fact that Oregon is 2-2, got housed by 40 at home, and are still ranked. I could keep going. The SEC conspiracy people are about on par with the 9/11 truthers.

 

[Tad Footeball]

What's deserve got to do with anything? See this is the type of assbackwards logic that kills me. Did Oregon 'deserve' to start out the year ranked 5th? Or are we just gonna focus on SEC teams that may have been over-ranked? Did USC deserve to start out in the top 10 after losing 4 games from the previous year and a bunch of starters? Lemme guess, you got no issues with where they were ranked right? You're obsessed with the SEC, clearly.

We fvcked you in the *** last time we played you.


View attachment 32011

OK? Look UF isn't a good team. I fully expect them to be at best 2-2 over the next 4 games, likely 1-3 and they'll be around 7-5 or 8-4 this year. That still has nothing to do with claiming a team who is 4-0 and is ranked dead last in the poll is ranked where they are because of SEC bias, it's a ridiculous argument. I could see if they had jumped into the top 15 or something, they're dead last in the **** poll LOL. Conveniently, people forget things like Auburn dropping all the way from 7 to 15 after a WIN. Granted, it was a very unimpressive win, but the point remains the same. Or the fact that Oregon is 2-2, got housed by 40 at home, and are still ranked. I could keep going. The SEC conspiracy people are about on par with the 9/11 truthers.

Oregon isn't ranked in The AP Poll- what we're talking about here. The Corches Poll isn't even worth acknowledging. UiF is ranked like 23 in that joke.

 

[weownfsu]

Michigan is legit

Miami would beat Michigan

L O L

 

[Biscuits]

I'm confused...

Why are Michigan's and Florida's coaches winning games in their first season? And not their first REAL season, but their very first season. Someone help me out.

 

[iLIKEDADE!]

Threads like these is why I don't like to watch football w just any ol body.

You dudes really don't know football.