Holy crap..

I mean this goes both ways, I’m a fan of Richt but I 100% disagree on how he’s handling QB situation but to say he’s Ryan Tannehill is just foolish also. Stop being so dramatic and also for the other side not everything Richt does should be accepted as bible
This is fair.
 
Advertisement
I'm curious as to which coaches are winning national championships without a roster loaded with talent?
 
Dabo Swinney was 19-15 before Clemson’s first 10 win season, which didn’t come until his 4th year coaching that program, around the same time Clemson got their first top 10 recruiting class this decade, CMR is currently 19-8 in Miami, a 10 win season in his 2nd year, and got us our first top 10 recruiting class this decade in his 3rd year, fckers can’t be greatful, like we didn’t go through 5 years of bullshxt with Al Golden, CMR isn’t in the upper echelon of a coaching with Saban and Meyer, but he’s still a good coach that is slowly turning a program that had been dead & mediocre for 15 years, the only thing he’s lacking in aside from play-calling creativity is recruiting, but when that changes around the results will show on the field. I’m just as ****ed with the results of the LSU game but it’s Wednesday, we took an L, move on, all this fire coach pessimistic bixcthing is fckin annoying.
 
VERY WELL said ... outside the fact that Butch Davis wasn't a really good coach.

He was a **** of a recruiter, motivator and talent-developer—but as a game day X's and Os's guy, he wasn't impressive.

The Canes had talent back in the fold by 1999, yet still lost a winnable game to No. 2 Penn State—down early, reclaiming the lead and losing on big touchdown plate. Weeks laters Miami blew a 24-3 lead over East Carolina, losing 27-23.

Miami also had enough to challenge and beat Florida State in Tallahassee that year; tied 21-21 at the half and falling, 31-21. Better coaching could've won a few of those. (Same to be said for an early game at Washington the next season.)

Same situation with Butch in Cleveland, as well as in North Carolina—funneling superior talent to Chapel Hill, but still not winning the big games.
Sounds like you did not read what I wrote. Not sure why you are going on about butch’s gameday coaching. I specifically pointed out that he was the best talent evaluator we’ll ever see, and that was the reason to consider him a ‘top’ coach.
 
Mark Richt was an offensive coordinator under Bobby Bowden, coaching up two Heisman winners (Charlie Ward, Chris Weinke) and running the offense on two national championship teams (1993, 1999) before getting the Georgia gig, where he went 145-51 over 15 seasons—winning the SEC East six times and the conference, two. He then won the ACC Coastal year two at Miami, when the program was 0-fo-14 before his arrival.

Ryan Tannehill was an overrated prospect from Texas A&M who only went where he did in the 2012 NFL Draft because (1) it was a weak QB class, (2) because he had a prototypical QB size / build and (3) because the Dolphins' front office is a joke. He has had a sub-par career and literally accomplished nothing.

The comparison because Miami fans are too short-sighted to admit that Richt walked into a garbage situation—that is going to take more than two full recruiting classes to fix—shows how little some of you know about football, as well as this program.

Carry on being unfunny.
Charlie Weiss was a great OC. Much better than Richt. Didn’t make him a great head coach.

You are sugarcoating Richt’s Georgia run. His last SEC title was 2005. He couldnt compete any longer. Kirby Smart is also proving you can do better at UGA than Richt did.

Go ahead and delude yourself if you want to.
 
Erickson Elite? From what I understand, he had an all star coaching staff. Then he went to ASU and the sun shone.

Erickson’s coaching was very impressive, especially when you mix in he was plastered majority of the time. He probably calls plays better than Richt with a bottle of thunderbird in one hand and a play sheet in the other.
 
My concerns are that we may have brought in a coach that has reached his ceiling as far as leadership and player development. The fire that fueled him after his dismissal at Georgia seems to have simmered. I know we will not win every game but I really expected us to be better prepared, more disciplined, more focused, more efficient and more competitive. Forget about swag, LSU took this team's confidence QUICKLY! We are regressing as a team. That falls on Richt and the coaches. This is his third year and we have regressed.

He is also a coach that continues to start players that have also reached their ceiling and development. I do believe that players tend to follow the persona of their coach. I saw very little emotion, one way or another from Richt on Sunday. As if he was on a beta blocker.

Orgeron was the opposite. Not saying Orgeron is a better coach than Richt, but he certainly was Sunday and he was more passionate. HE didn't even second guess going for it on 4th downs. LSU showed up to win that game. They beat us with a QB that had been in camp 30 days, with suspended starters, with injured players, with three injured starters hurt during the game, with no **** timeouts halfway through the first quarter and with upper class players that up to the game, had not contributed to LSU. That's what we were spotted and we were not able to overcome. Not even close.
We have lost four in a row and if it was not for Savannah State on the schedule next, I am not sure how confident I would be going into Toledo on the road.
 
My concerns are that we may have brought in a coach that has reached his ceiling as far as leadership and player development. The fire that fueled him after his dismissal at Georgia seems to have simmered. I know we will not win every game but I really expected us to be better prepared, more disciplined, more focused, more efficient and more competitive. Forget about swag, LSU took this team's confidence QUICKLY! We are regressing as a team. That falls on Richt and the coaches. This is his third year and we have regressed.

He is also a coach that continues to start players that have also reached their ceiling and development. I do believe that players tend to follow the persona of their coach. I saw very little emotion, one way or another from Richt on Sunday. As if he was on a beta blocker.

Orgeron was the opposite. Not saying Orgeron is a better coach than Richt, but he certainly was Sunday and he was more passionate. HE didn't even second guess going for it on 4th downs. LSU showed up to win that game. They beat us with a QB that had been in camp 30 days, with suspended starters, with injured players, with three injured starters hurt during the game, with no **** timeouts halfway through the first quarter and with upper class players that up to the game, had not contributed to LSU. That's what we were spotted and we were not able to overcome. Not even close.
We have lost four in a row and if it was not for Savannah State on the schedule next, I am not sure how confident I would be going into Toledo on the road.

Agree about Orgeron and his Alpha Male passion. But then again, that passion thing comes down to coach's " personality types. " For example, St. Bowden wasn't the passionate type on the sidelines. But then again, perhaps he was a " mad man " on the practice field. Whereas Good Ol' Boy Jimbo was relatively passionate on the sidelines.

Who knows, maybe this passionate thing is overrated and what not.
 
Erickson’s coaching was very impressive, especially when you mix in he was plastered majority of the time. He probably calls plays better than Richt with a bottle of thunderbird in one hand and a play sheet in the other.


Real recognize real. My opinion was swayed.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top