- Joined
- Nov 2, 2011
- Messages
- 8,408
Last edited:
That is life. Scholarships are not guaranteed. Coaches need to stop being emotional girls.
That is life. Scholarships are not guaranteed. Coaches need to stop being emotional girls.
That is life. Scholarships are not guaranteed. Coaches need to stop being emotional girls.
The coach has every right, and frankly duty, to protect his players, his KIDS from these predatory practices.
That is life. Scholarships are not guaranteed. Coaches need to stop being emotional girls.
The coach has every right, and frankly duty, to protect his players, his KIDS from these predatory practices.
It is the duty of the mother and father to protect their kids and not some coach. Players decommitt all the time. So why is it such a big deal when a University decides to go in another direction?
That is life. Scholarships are not guaranteed. Coaches need to stop being emotional girls.
Would neg you if I could.
Moron.
That is life. Scholarships are not guaranteed. Coaches need to stop being emotional girls.
Would neg you if I could.
Moron.
Agree. Once an offer is accepted the school should honor it until the player says no.
Yeah if you don't think FAMU is wrong for this, I don't think anything can convince you otherwise. The coach, as a leader, role model and often times father figure, is doing the right thing.
Kids (recruits) are expected to act like kids. Adults (college coaches)are expected to act like adults. The expectations are higher for adults. FAMU's actions are disgusting.
Kids (recruits) are expected to act like kids. Adults (college coaches)are expected to act like adults. The expectations are higher for adults. FAMU's actions are disgusting.
People are paid to win games. If you have to cut a player then it must be done. Most Universities send out over 100 plus offers with only 25 spots available. If Cook or Valentine wanted a roster spot some kid for UM will be told to look somewhere else.
It is part of the business of playing sports.