gotta give the acc credit for transparency with officiating

[ageezy]

i've never seen that before and it was actually interesting ... replays are normally quick bathroom breaks, but enjoyed watching them talk it out ... hope it becomes a norm

 

[caneULM]

I am not crapping on your post because I don't show up other posters but the ACC's "transparencies" mean nothing because the refs don't call what they are supposed to call, especially against Miami.

 

[BishopEli]

It's the best thing the ACC has done in a while, I'd rather watch that than staring at a head ref under the hood for ten min while ****** announcers and a "rules expert" comparing who's more blind

 

[Echtcane]

I like that you can hear their conversations about it, but they will still blatantly cheat. It's just like media being well aware that holding is deliberately ignored all the time, then suddenly called when they want to strategically break a drive. They lie constantly.

 

[01Falsetto]

Big 12 does this as well

 

[TaylorWalls]

I like that you can hear their conversations about it, but they will still blatantly cheat. It's just like media being well aware that holding is deliberately ignored all the time, then suddenly called when they want to strategically break a drive. They lie constantly.

Last night I heard that the ACC was blatantly cheating for FSU and they were blatantly cheating for Virginia. Why don't we act like adults and acknowledge that they simply call it like they see it.

 

[TheU1984]

Last night I heard that the ACC was blatantly cheating for FSU and they were blatantly cheating for Virginia. Why don't we act like adults and acknowledge that they simply call it like they see it.

They got it right every time in the booth.

It was interesting though they were so quick to uphold the FSU tying TD that could’ve been a little more scrutinized, and they really took their time looking at the UVA 2-pt conversion catch.

 

[Echtcane]

Last night I heard that the ACC was blatantly cheating for FSU and they were blatantly cheating for Virginia. Why don't we act like adults and acknowledge that they simply call it like they see it.

Because they don't.

 

[CaneandAbel]

Its cool and appreciate the transparency but I noticed that in the games they give us this look in most of the calls are upheld where as the other non major televised games theres a lot more calls that stand. That tells me when they're not put on blast they just be bull ****ting up there but when the camera are on them they have their act together.

 

[TaylorWalls]

Because they don't.

Yes they do. Anyone who approaches it without any bias knows they aren't sitting in that room cheating.

 

[#1cane]

They got it right every time in the booth.

It was interesting though they were so quick to uphold the FSU tying TD that could’ve been a little more scrutinized, and they really took their time looking at the UVA 2-pt conversion catch.

I still do not see how they rule the FSU no fumble after the catch. Caught the ball with two hands turned taking a step and then the ball came out. For me that rule sucks. I officiated for 30 years.

 

[BS85]

Last night I heard that the ACC was blatantly cheating for FSU and they were blatantly cheating for Virginia. Why don't we act like adults and acknowledge that they simply call it like they see it.

Because they don't, at least not always

 

[UMFarArcher]

Last night I heard that the ACC was blatantly cheating for FSU and they were blatantly cheating for Virginia. Why don't we act like adults and acknowledge that they simply call it like they see it.

40 years of watching UM versus Notre Dame Refs.

40 years of watching UM versus Tobacco Road Refs.

40 years of watching UM versus ANY ACC opponent.

That's why.

 

[flips]

Points for transparency, but it's awful television. It all but eliminates the debates between the announcers on the broadcast, which sometimes were interesting and entertaining. There's periods of dead air when the replay center guy is fumbling trying to switch camera angles to show the ref. Bad TV.

 

[TaylorWalls]

40 years of watching UM versus Notre Dame Refs.

40 years of watching UM versus Tobacco Road Refs.

40 years of watching UM versus ANY ACC opponent.

That's why.

So when replays could have gone against us at least three times last year in game-changing situations, how did those replays go?

 

[TaylorWalls]

Because they don't, at least not always

You have no evidence to show otherwise.

 

[TaylorWalls]

This thread is like all of the goons on Twitter who swear that a game is rigged because their prop bet lost.

 

[UMFarArcher]

So when replays could have gone against us at least three times last year in game-changing situations, how did those replays go?

Two games over 30 years?

You must be a pup.

 

[mosthated305]

I would like some transparency on the non called holds against our DL every **** game.

 

[bdcane4eva]

Now threads extolling the virtues of all the corrupt officiating
I can't anymore