forums

Good thing there was an early signing period

Utoronto

Utoronto

Redshirt Freshman
Joined
Jan 30, 2012
Messages
264
9971f40f6ad8ac1ce54d96b08b3cc0dd2d2650a87c42cb6a7913fe3ffd153ef0.webp
 
Advertisement
YEAH THEY TOTALLY WOULD HAVE BAILED BECAUSE WE LOST BY 10 TO A GOOD TEAM AND OUR QB THAT WON'T PLAY NEXT YEAR IS HORRIBLE HA HA
 
I feel your pain, but the players who were coming were coming regardless of the outcome of this particular game. SF players believe they will be difference makers, and they will. We need more play makers and for our coaches to make adjustments. They should be disappointed in their performance down the final stretch of the season. It'll be interesting to see what changes come or if changes come.
 
jhtheking said:
Utoronto said:
Ya right, you wouldn't be nervous one bit about losing any of them. FOH.
Click to expand...

YEAH I WAS NERVOUS WHEN THEY ALL BAILED AFTER THE PITT GAME
Click to expand...

That's a real rational argument - why not say you were nervous they'd all bail after a touchdown while you're at it.

Before the Pitt game, Miami probably had more buzz and momentum than anyone in college football. After each successive loss, that momentum has gone down (to the point that after this game it might have turned negative). Now imagine instead of losing against Pitt and Clemson, we won both those games and moved into the playoffs - wouldn't you be feeling we have so much momentum that we should be nabbing some of the biggest recruits still available (along with flipping some others)? So if you're logical, the reverse if obviously true as well.

We had the biggest group of early signees (i believe), so we really benefited by the early signing period. Year in, and year out, we've been sputtering down the recruiting stretch..........so ya, I'm glad we got to sign so many early. If you wouldn't be nervous in the least about losing anyone, then congrats, your glass is overflowing.
 
Its about relationships kids were coming anyway, y do people think u lose and u lose every recruit?
 
Utoronto said:
jhtheking said:
Utoronto said:
Ya right, you wouldn't be nervous one bit about losing any of them. FOH.
Click to expand...

YEAH I WAS NERVOUS WHEN THEY ALL BAILED AFTER THE PITT GAME
Click to expand...

That's a real rational argument - why not say you were nervous they'd all bail after a touchdown while you're at it.

Before the Pitt game, Miami probably had more buzz and momentum than anyone in college football. After each successive loss, that momentum has gone down (to the point that after this game it might have turned negative). Now imagine instead of losing against Pitt and Clemson, we won both those games and moved into the playoffs - wouldn't you be feeling we have so much momentum that we should be nabbing some of the biggest recruits still available (along with flipping some others)? So if you're logical, the reverse if obviously true as well.

We had the biggest group of early signees (i believe), so we really benefited by the early signing period. Year in, and year out, we've been sputtering down the recruiting stretch..........so ya, I'm glad we got to sign so many early. If you wouldn't be nervous in the least about losing anyone, then congrats, your glass is overflowing.
Click to expand...

You're right. It's more rational to think they'd all bail after losing to a good team by a reasonable amount than to a ******* awful team. I mean, two losses and they'll stick around, but lose to ******* #6 WISCONSIN BY 10??? ARE YOU ******* KIDDING ME?? GET THE **** OUT WHILE YOU CAN RECRUITS!!
 
Advertisement
jhtheking said:
Utoronto said:
jhtheking said:
Utoronto said:
Ya right, you wouldn't be nervous one bit about losing any of them. FOH.
Click to expand...

YEAH I WAS NERVOUS WHEN THEY ALL BAILED AFTER THE PITT GAME
Click to expand...

That's a real rational argument - why not say you were nervous they'd all bail after a touchdown while you're at it.

Before the Pitt game, Miami probably had more buzz and momentum than anyone in college football. After each successive loss, that momentum has gone down (to the point that after this game it might have turned negative). Now imagine instead of losing against Pitt and Clemson, we won both those games and moved into the playoffs - wouldn't you be feeling we have so much momentum that we should be nabbing some of the biggest recruits still available (along with flipping some others)? So if you're logical, the reverse if obviously true as well.

We had the biggest group of early signees (i believe), so we really benefited by the early signing period. Year in, and year out, we've been sputtering down the recruiting stretch..........so ya, I'm glad we got to sign so many early. If you wouldn't be nervous in the least about losing anyone, then congrats, your glass is overflowing.
Click to expand...

You're right. It's more rational to think they'd all bail after losing to a good team by a reasonable amount than to a ****ing awful team. I mean, two losses and they'll stick around, but lose to ****ING #6 WISCONSIN BY 10??? ARE YOU ****ING KIDDING ME?? GET THE **** OUT WHILE YOU CAN RECRUITS!!
Click to expand...

Who said they'd all bail? I feel waaaaaaay more comfortable that so many are locked up though.

i guess all those late flips in years past are nothing to get worried over. Can never happen again..........good to know. I'm sure everyone is happy we'll never have another commit flip ever again.......phew!
 
Back
Top