umhurricano
Sophomore
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2012
- Messages
- 926
I came across this in the WSJ today: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444914904577617521477347562.html?mod=WSJ_hp_EditorsPicks
It brought up some interesting points that have been discussed on the board before like recruiting positions by physical type.
The thing I like most about Golden is his organizational process that seems to apply to every facet of the program, whether directly related to football or not.
Saban appears to be the master of process at this time (just re-watched the national title game, 0 penalties is just amazing). It makes me wonder, once we get through all of this bs (sanctions, no depth, etc...) whether Golden's process is good enough to get us to a 'bama (or old 'canes) level of dominance, whether Saban is a cut above, or whether big state schools now have such a competitive advantage that process is negated.
It brought up some interesting points that have been discussed on the board before like recruiting positions by physical type.
The thing I like most about Golden is his organizational process that seems to apply to every facet of the program, whether directly related to football or not.
Saban appears to be the master of process at this time (just re-watched the national title game, 0 penalties is just amazing). It makes me wonder, once we get through all of this bs (sanctions, no depth, etc...) whether Golden's process is good enough to get us to a 'bama (or old 'canes) level of dominance, whether Saban is a cut above, or whether big state schools now have such a competitive advantage that process is negated.