GOLDEN CANE Mike Ryan provides the latest updates in Miami's AD search and talks Protect College Sports Act

CanesInSight Articles
4 min read

Comments (71)

I think @TheOriginalCane point was, Miami believes the traditional AD role tasks are already handled. This may/may not prove correct.

What is missing is the right personality to navigate the $$$$$$$$$ media rights/marketing landscape that Joe E has long stated is a critical element to big time college athletics.

I'm not certain the USF gato gets this done.


Don't bother with that guy, he's an actual clown. Acting like Miami will hire a guy because he is "lilly white".

How does anyone converse with a moron like that?

I could name a few guys who "cut their teeth" at "actual colleges" with "actual athletics".

Dan Radakovich
"Beta" Blake James
Shawn "The Shermanator" Eichorst
Dave "The Maggot" Maggard

How did those guys work out for Miami, what with their experience and resumes?


1790129861859.png
 
Don't bother with that guy, he's an actual clown. Acting like Miami will hire a guy because he is "lilly white".

How does anyone converse with a moron like that?

I could name a few guys who "cut their teeth" at "actual colleges" with "actual athletics".

Dan Radakovich
"Beta" Blake James
Shawn "The Shermanator" Eichorst
Dave "The Maggot" Maggard

How did those guys work out for Miami, what with their experience and resumes?


View attachment 373849
We all miss Blake so much.

Boston College got a gem with that one.....

Goodness the damage he caused....


🤣🤣🤣🤣
 
You mean like us moving to another conference- like that? And this guy knows as much about college athletics as you do- which ain’t a high bar to get over. Now I know he’s a friend of the princess- but that doesn’t mean he’s qualified.
Do you really have to be a **** with every post?
 
My main question is why is he interested in Miami? It's a step down from EVP and c-suite of a major sport, even if the sport has declined a bit.

Passion project or weird skeletons in the closet?
 
So, yeah, if Brian Herbst ends up being our guy...I'd say he was over-qualified. ****, he could be the ACC Commissioner. He already lives in Charlotte...
This is what the ACC Commissioner should be. Instead, its a career administrator that is a flake for a program that isn't even in the conference. Not to mention that is absolutely terrible and has no experience doing what the commish should be doing - which is what Herbst specializes in.

IMO - pursuit of Herbst smells like Miami prepping for the independent period in this bill and knowing we have to stay afloat and cover everything that comes with the lack of conference money for 3 years. Navigating our own TV rights, our own revenue generation, etc.
 
There are very reasonable answers, but I’m not going to get into that on an open forum.

No skeletons.

All good! If you wanted to DM me, I wouldn't complain but I also understand not doing so especially as you know him.
 
This is what the ACC Commissioner should be. Instead, its a career administrator that is a flake for a program that isn't even in the conference. Not to mention that is absolutely terrible and has no experience doing what the commish should be doing - which is what Herbst specializes in.

IMO - pursuit of Herbst smells like Miami prepping for the independent period in this bill and knowing we have to stay afloat and cover everything that comes with the lack of conference money for 3 years. Navigating our own TV rights, our own revenue generation, etc.
That's a good thought and actually brings up a good point.

Once Miami announced they're leaving the ACC and joining the B1G, even during independence, it's in the BIG's (and their partners') best interest for Miami to remain relevant and popular. So assumedly they'll help out with scheduling and TV rights and treat Miami like a pseudo member for their own benefit.

That's why the independent clause is so dumb anyways. Because nothing prevents a conference from treating another program LIKE a member (besides the payout) even if they're not officially a full member.
 
That's a good thought and actually brings up a good point.

Once Miami announced they're leaving the ACC and joining the B1G, even during independence, it's in the BIG's (and their partners') best interest for Miami to remain relevant and popular. So assumedly they'll help out with scheduling and TV rights and treat Miami like a pseudo member for their own benefit.

That's why the independent clause is so dumb anyways. Because nothing prevents a conference from treating another program LIKE a member (besides the payout) even if they're not officially a full member.
Yep... I feel like there's an avenue to be an independent member but still be a "bolt on" to the TV deal and get similar money. Would obviously take a relationship with Fox to navigate it (assuming B1G is the destination).

Scheduling is what I'm most curious about. Obviously, we can keep 3 games in the non-conference but finding 9 other P4 members is going to be interesting to say the least. All these series getting cancelled because no one wants the extra P4 game with the 9 game conference slate... let alone finding 8-9 of them.

Probably going to see all the teams leaving go at the same time and play each other. Miami, Clemson, FSU, UNC, Virginia, etc.
 
Mike Ryan's pointed it out, and I've said for years, that in maximizing revenue it makes no sense that everything is moving in a direction to drive revenue except that Minnesota vs Maryland is a waste of resources, from that perspective.

The biggest albatross these conferences have are the weak teams. Replacing Rutgers, Maryland, and Iowa with Miami, FSU, and North Carolina would probably generate more revenue than any other move the conference could make.

So why are these conferences willing to burn everything down, go to Congress for help, completely wreck the sport but are not willing to remove teams. They destroyed the PAC10 and BIG12. No issues. But this is the line they won't cross? Seems odd to me.

I'm still behind the idea of dissolving the ACC and creating a new conference. Go poach a handful of teams from the BIG10 and SEC. Get a conference of 10-12 teams that are all big ticket schools and run a wildly efficient model that has every Saturday matchup as a must see game. You can take advantage of the fact that these other conferences are burdened by these schools that don't draw eyeballs. If you had a conference that was only (I know there are logistical issues here but it's to prove a point):

Miami
FSU
Clemson
North Carolina
Texas A&M
Florida
Oregon
USC
Texas
Oklahoma

There's not a single matchup during the week that would be poor. That's 4/5 matchups every week (including bye weeks). You can do a Friday game and 3-4 Saturday games (noon, 3:30, and 7:30). It's efficient, it's attractive. It's an outside the box solution that more appropriately aligns with where the sport is going.
 
Clearly you've been banned before and have some unresolved grudges. Good luck with that.
Says the guy who lashes out at every poster who doesn't buy what your attempting to push- you have been the quintessential 15 year old girl on here for quite some time.
 
Don't bother with that guy, he's an actual clown. Acting like Miami will hire a guy because he is "lilly white".

How does anyone converse with a moron like that?

I could name a few guys who "cut their teeth" at "actual colleges" with "actual athletics".

Dan Radakovich
"Beta" Blake James
Shawn "The Shermanator" Eichorst
Dave "The Maggot" Maggard

How did those guys work out for Miami, what with their experience and resumes?


View attachment 373849
And who was responsible for hiring those dudes? And are they still in that position at Miami?
 
Back
Top