moshated305
Senior
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2012
- Messages
- 8,869
Bad bet with Miami on a short week and missing key starters. We got out injury free which was the goal.
Did you see how out of shape Ragone is though???? UN-AC-CEP-TA-B-LEThe same people overreacting to this game and throwing a hissyfit were probably the same people feeling good about Gattis putting up 70 on BC last year.
49…54 ..whatever ….these type games are a back door cover waiting to happen..
Median difference in number of plays is down 5 per game from last year. Running clock is a non factor (so far this year). I mean Miami ran 70ish plays tonight. Last week was mid 50s. Are we to believe the clock was the reason this team scored the same amount of points against a team that’s WAY worse than last week despite running more plays?A lot of Jesse Palmers in here that don’t understand the new clock.
Median difference in number of plays is down 5 per game from last year. Running clock is a non factor (so far this year).
Huge spreads are all about what the better teams coach wants to do. Mario is never gonna score 80 like Oregon or OU did a couple weeks ago.
I’m not saying your prediction was wrong. I actually have no clue what you said. I’m saying the clock had nothing to do with it. Ran more plays than last week, against a way worse team, and scored the same amount of points.I said both would happen. Moving on to Saturday’s bag.
I’m not saying your prediction was wrong. I actually have no clue what you said. I’m saying the clock had nothing to do with it. Ran more plays than last week, against a way worse team, and scored the same amount of points.
Nobody in this thread is complaining…only people on this website could find a way to be ****y after that game.
BumpI took Bethune. Mario is going to run the clock and he’s respectful.
I took the under too
Miamis covered in back to back games