FTP: UNC 4th and 17

[Dghustla]

Instead of 3 guys down and 3 guys hovering. I’d rather have all 6 on the line.

 

[432Cane]

We doubled him and he still got open like that

Gurvan Hall gets caught up inside for whatever reason! He has Trejan underneath for anything inside. He should have been ready to jump on anything going outside.

 

[miamimike305]

Holy ****, you’re right!

We only have 10 guys out there! It’s definitely only 10 guys on defense. I checked several times just to be sure.

**** you, Baker! And that’s after a TO

Just checked another video on YouTube. There were 11 men on the field. It's just there's a safety so far off the play for some reason.

 

[ssvir]

No...it’s only 10 for sure

Wrong. There are 11 but Rob Knowles is out of the screenshot.

 

[The Svengali]

Didn’t we have a safety 17 yards deep? That would make sense. In that photo we can only see 14 yards beyond the line of scrimmage.

If so, he c

Wrong. There are 11 but Rob Knowles is out of the screenshot.

Ok...i was looking at the video on this thread

 

[NOLAcane34]

I’m not changing the most positive play in my life as a canes fan for a 4th & 17 against a UNC team that will finish 8-4. If I didn’t change it for a 4th & 14 in the national title game... nah

Just a suggestion bruh

 

[For_The_U]

What exactly was Bandy's contribution on that play? I mean literally, based on where he started in the formation, the field he ultimately covered and the spacing of the receivers, what did he THINK he was doing on that play?!?

 

[Brains]

Find a way to lose

This is where we are as a program.

 

[Shogungts]

Correct me if I'm wrong @Roman Marciante, but every piece of evidence and tendency for the game said that's where he was going with the ball, so did we even send the blitz from the right side?

I don't know, but if we thought he was throwing to that side and blitzed from that then 1) the QB will likely see it sooner and 2) we take a defender out of coverage on where we think the ball is going.

Now obviously the play didn't work so it was either a bad call and/or bad execution, but I don't think blitzing from the other side would have made it any better (other than maybe if the blitz got there quicker b/c the blitzing defender would have been closer to the LOS).

 

[Boarcane]

This eerily resembles mannys first year and me griping. Unnecessary blitzes , with horrible disguising. I *****ed about this to nauseam.

2 deep man with bumping and just unleashing garvin, hill , Rousseau and Ford was the common sense approach to that long of distance.

Post of the day! This should get one million thumbs up and be pinned at the top of the board!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[simplycanes]

I don't know, but if we thought he was throwing to that side and blitzed from that then 1) the QB will likely see it sooner and 2) we take a defender out of coverage on where we think the ball is going.

Now obviously the play didn't work so it was either a bad call and/or bad execution, but I don't think blitzing from the other side would have made it any better (other than maybe if the blitz got there quicker b/c the blitzing defender would have been closer to the LOS).

To me, it hurries that pass and keeps the receiver from getting passed the sticks. Howell is also 5'10" so pretty much anything requires him to step up or bail to get back into throwing position.

 

[Boarcane]

Idk if I'm tripping but can someone verify there was 11 men on the field? I keep counting 10.View attachment 96724

Dam I counted ten. Someone please tell me this is 11

 

[Boarcane]

Bump Roman... is it ten on the field? Tell me it isn’t so

 

[Cribby]

I’m seeing ten as well

 

[We the Boss]

This makes me SICK to look at again!

Baker must go

That play was vintage manny.

 

[Boarcane]

I’m literally disgusted. I can live with almost anything.... but 10 is literally for the guy that has “one job”. How the FVCK does this happen!