ESPN Ranks Miami's Mark Fletcher No. 4 Running Back in College Football

Trinton Breeze
3 min read

Comments (41)

It’s true even if our fans get mad at it. It’s a fair take.

Just think our OL last season and put Baugh back there or Lacy. They would put up monster numbers imo. Fletcher is great but that’s what he lacks, it’s fair even if homers don’t agree.
Baugh is good, Gator or not.

I love Fletcher but prior to the playoffs, he was a very polarizing player. He does lack breakaway speed. Him at 5 is fair. That said, not sure I would take anyone else over him in the playoffs. Playoff Mark is another dimension.
 
I love all the annual Gaytor slurps, keep them coming, it makes their seasonal demise that much better.
 
Baugh is trash.

1/3 of his rushing yards last year came against Long Island and FSU.

Mark Fletcher earned every bit of acclaim during the playoffs last year. He was An animal against the absolute best defenses in the country. With very little threat to stretch defenses in our pass game, he ran through over and around teams who knew what was coming. He’s got plenty of speed for a guy his size. You don’t have two 50+ yard runs in the playoffs if you’re slow. There’s only so many Bo Jacksons out there running 4.3 at 230lbs.
 
It’s an embarrassment of riches in our RB room. Be interesting to see how Dawson allocates carries.
 
Baugh is trash.

1/3 of his rushing yards last year came against Long Island and FSU.

Mark Fletcher earned every bit of acclaim during the playoffs last year. He was An animal against the absolute best defenses in the country. With very little threat to stretch defenses in our pass game, he ran through over and around teams who knew what was coming. He’s got plenty of speed for a guy his size. You don’t have two 50+ yard runs in the playoffs if you’re slow. There’s only so many Bo Jacksons out there running 4.3 at 230lbs.
You are thinking just like me. Baugh had half of his yards and TDs against LIU, FSU and Miss ST.
Hardy feasted on those same kinds of teams and the only really good game he had against a quality team was Texas AM.
Now if someone wants to rank Lacy ahead of Mark, I won't have push back there.
Not saying that Baugh and Hardy aren't good backs, they certainly are. But ahead of Mark? No way for me.
Also add in that Mark doesn't get as many stretch and outside runs as other backs do and primarily runs straight up the middle in formations and situations where we are basically telling the other team what we are going to do.
As far as blocking and pass protection, Mark is elite, but I have to be honest I didn't watch the others as closely to see how they fare in that area to compare and rank.
 
Fletcher's playoff run was historic. He's a Canes legend. He may end up the Canes all time leading rusher.

But this 4 game swing in how he's perceived is pretty amazing.

Last season Fletcher finished 6th in All-ACC votes for RB's & no one argued against it.

Now ranking him the 4th in all of college football is disrespectful.
 
Fletcher's playoff run was historic. He's a Canes legend. He may end up the Canes all time leading rusher.

But this 4 game swing in how he's perceived is pretty amazing.

Last season Fletcher finished 6th in All-ACC votes for RB's & no one argued against it.

Now ranking him the 4th in all of college football is dis
Because people out a premium on big game performances. If Fletcher had padded his numbers against overmatched regular season opponents and flopped in the playoffs, nobody would be on his hype train. Personally, seeing a guy run that good against essentially three elite defenses, (Ole Miss is a notch below the other three playoff defenses we faced) is much more validating. I don’t care about guys putting up numbers against Stanford or USF.
 
It must be tough to watch your once superior SEC product turning to sht before your eyes...

Although as I type that I think ESPN should really be used to it by now.

I'm going to assume you misused the word "your" in the first sentence - and wasn't directing that at me.

Because I've been a hardcore UM fan since 1973 - when we really sucked - more than a Black Hole.

Did I assume correctly?
 
This is one the most impressive young men I’ve seen on a Canes team in a very long time. Not only is he great on the field, but he is as close to a perfect role model there is. Just listening to a few of his interviews, it would be hard even for rivals not to root for him, just a great young man!
 
It’s true even if our fans get mad at it. It’s a fair take.

Just think our OL last season and put Baugh back there or Lacy. They would put up monster numbers imo. Fletcher is great but that’s what he lacks, it’s fair even if homers don’t agree.
I'll say not elite in acceleration for sure, but 6'2 and 220 plus is hard to get going. His top end speed is more than adequate as he proved in the playoff games.
 
Because people out a premium on big game performances. If Fletcher had padded his numbers against overmatched regular season opponents and flopped in the playoffs, nobody would be on his hype train. Personally, seeing a guy run that good against essentially three elite defenses, (Ole Miss is a notch below the other three playoff defenses we faced) is much more validating. I don’t care about guys putting up numbers against Stanford or USF.
I get that & agree big game performances should be weighted more. But people only "sort of" do that.

Fletcher averaged 6.8 ypc in 4 playoff games - but only 4.2 in 8 regular season games.

Miami's last 2 games in 2024 were vs ranked teams - Martinez 11.0 - Fletcher 4.3 - Lyle 3.3

The main thing to watch is - his running style changed for the better in the playoffs (mainly running straight vs trying to make moves in the open field). Will that continue or will he revert?

IMO it's legit to rank Fletcher in the Top 5 RB's. That new style is the key to justifying it.
 
Last edited:
Mark needs to be somewhat limited in the regular season. We need playoff Mark in December/January fresh and ready.
 
Back
Top