Enos presser

[TruCane81]

Kind of think CIS is defining the entire offense based on our worst display of the season. Our offense actually performed better in every statistic against UF than against CMU. So if you do the offense the favor of not basing your entire viewpoint on their worst performance, you've got an offense that yes, is frustrating in the red zone and on third down, but is doing a lot of things better than we have in a long time.

Also, people crying that all our snaps come from under center need to revisit the UNC game, where we put up the most yards UNC has allowed all season, and were operating from shotgun a majority of the time. Also quick 5-10 yard passes exploiting the space UNC were giving us was on full display.

We're still learning what we have with this offense and each game will tell us more. Let's stop pretending we know exactly what this offense is 4 games into the seaosn.

The unc game is exactly why I say his offense can work and why he should expand on the shotgun play and stick with it.

It is what we do best. I’m sure it is the same way in practice. Our offensive line issues didn’t magically appear out of nowhere. He has seen it since spring.

It is important that he grows the team’s confidence by being successful to pick up momentum. Forcing concepts we still need a ton of work on will lead to bad places we don’t want to go.

After the #TNM hype train, they need to win games above all else. Installing his desired system has to be secondary to that or recruiting will suffer and the fans will turn on him

I think he is being a little naive as well as stubborn. Using cmu as a glorified scrimmage almost resulted in a loss if that is what he is doing. His head coach wrote a big check with his mouth in the offseason and put the staff under the gun.

Results have to be the sole focus now. Get the wins even if you have to adjust your philosophy. If not, you may not get the recruits to sign on after the bait and switch of the new Miami hype.

We have to win to get players. Just ask Richt about the difference between the 2018 class and 2019 class.

 

[Cane6]

"Talking out of both sides", you evidently didn't get a thing I said you unfortunate illiterate.

They go shot gun to create mismatches because they don't have the talent to create it any other way. But it's successful only if the other team can't match up in talent. When a team does, it gets taken away. If you're happy getting 40 points against the weak sisters on your schedule than good for you. But as always you're entitled to be wrong. But come crying once you get ******-slapped by a team that matches up in talent, nobody wants to hear it.

If you've watched any football, on any level, besides UM, you'd see when teams are evenly matched, the teams that have the advantage are always those that can go multiple and create uncertainty and doubt in the opponent.



It proves nothing. Your point was we had higher "internet ranking", so we must have more talent.

It takes into account nothing else about evaluations, training and development, maturity, scheme fit, intangibles. In your limited thinking, since it's the only number that has been assigned, you assume it must be more reliable than any other subjective measure.

Well no **** if you are competent in rushing and passing it works to your advantage to vary your play calling. That’s not the point as we are discussing the 2019 Hurricanes offense and the poor production in relation to the talent

You made the statement that we have a worse OL than everyone else on our schedule besides FIU. Go ahead and document that statement without using recruiting rankings. I’m sure you’ve done your own evaluation of “ training and development, maturity, scheme fit, intangibles” for each team on the schedule

I’m done with you, go show your mom the mushroom stamp I just put on your forehead *****

 

[NorthEastCane]

Well no **** if you are competent in rushing and passing it works to your advantage to vary your play calling. That’s not the point as we are discussing the 2019 Hurricanes offense and the poor production in relation to the talent

You made the statement that we have a worse OL than everyone else on our schedule besides FIU. Go ahead and document that statement without using recruiting rankings. I’m sure you’ve done your own evaluation of “ training and development, maturity, scheme fit, intangibles” for each team on the schedule

I’m done with you, go show your mom the mushroom stamp I just put on your forehead *****

If it's no **** then what's your god dam problem hot head. This thread is not discussing the 2019 Hurricane offense. It's about bashing the OC for his "refusal" to go spread. And I was responding specifically about the comment below (see post 37, page 2):

"The guy literally on the first question he tries to convince you that under center is better then shotgun/spread. Dude is clueless. There is a reason everyone is in the shotgun now."​

Any one who's mind is not already made up knows that everyone is in the shotgun because it doesn't require talent and it's easier to implement (meaning it doesn't require as much coaching). It's a quick fix for talentless teams.

As far as the line, just watch the game. That's all the documentation you need.

 

[Glow]

Riley talking about the genius of Leach holding an entire practice where they literally just ran one play the entire practice on offense:

https://footballscoop.com/news/lincoln-riley-systems-not-qb-friendly-get-new-system/

I will continue to say, Enos' belief in multiple formations and a kitchen sink playbook is wrong, wrong, wrong on the college level.

Yea the constraints matter, I keep going back to that Ian Boyd explanation because it reads like a perfect litmus test for what Enos's Spread Coast should and shouldn't be.
Power running isn't a team strength and our QB says he hasn't even played under center since before HS, so how efficient is the allocation of limited practice and game snaps to tight formation under center FB PA stuff? Enos is certainly giving the defense more to think about and being less predictable by being multiple, but I am not convinced the payoff is worth it.









Let's get to the level of putting up 40 every game against inferior talent with plays that work, and then we can worry about all the exotic shuffling and multiple looks to confuse Clemson and Bama.