- Joined
- Jan 3, 2012
- Messages
- 4,386
I disagree.No it’s clear that the committee wants both ND and Bama instead of us.
IMO if BYU loses, they're out and Miami is in cause they'll jump Catholics.
I disagree.No it’s clear that the committee wants both ND and Bama instead of us.
It's not just BYU. What Bama does is just as important. They lose by 7-10 points and all that does is move them back to 10 and ND up to 9, leaving us right back to where we were before last night.If BYU loses, we are in.
If ND was 9, I’d be focusing on basketball rn. But they dropped them 10. Here’s where you insert the Brian Windhorst meme. Why would they do that?I thought this. Part of me still does. But maybe I’m just exhausted since Saturday. We’re two spots behind yet somehow they don’t consider us in the same pod? Us being one spot a part isn’t going to convince me they’ll do the right thing. But why even tease us and move us up to begin with?
Leaving us at 12 just makes me feel like they already made their decision regardless of what happens Saturday. The only thing I can think of that might change something is enough rage media to make the CFP think longer and harder about completely disregarding our H2H matchup. So far, not much. I can’t believe their justification for moving Alabama up a spot. It was comical. If they had moved us to #11, I’d have a shred of hope. We haven’t had any luck getting teams like OU and Bama to drop games. Nothing has really gone our way there and I’m a bit over it.
I’ve seen people say BYU winning helps us (it doesn’t) because it would put us next to ND. But that will grant a Big 12 team a CFP spot because TTU is not falling out of the 12. BYU winning would knock ND out of anything and there wouldn’t be spots for either of us.
This is what I want to believe. Josh Pate mentioned something about us rooting for Duke because he doesn’t think the CFP is going to shut out a P4 conference, especially one with a team as good as Miami and doesn’t buy the “two G5 team” possibility. Part of me thinks this could be true. The CFP can’t want 2 G5 teams in the 12 team field that would be insane. Feel like giving one G5 team was nice enough.If ND was 9, I’d be focusing on basketball rn. But they dropped them 10. Here’s where you insert the Brian Windhorst meme. Why would they do that?
BYU has to lose and preferably pretty handily. Why would they move ND to 10? It’s two reasons. This makes it very easy to drop both us and them out if BYU wins and say Bama loses. But if BYU loses and drops behind us, we will get right next to ND. It’s basically giving the committee an out. If I was ND or a ND fan I’d be nervous as **** tbh. Seems like they are DOA with the last rankings imo.
Well two G5 teams would make it. They wouldn’t leave a conference champ out in favor of us. They’d put us in over ND so the ACC doesn’t get shut out entirely. That was his point.This is what I want to believe. Josh Pate mentioned something about us rooting for Duke because he doesn’t think the CFP is going to shut out a P4 conference, especially one with a team as good as Miami and doesn’t buy the “two G5 team” possibility. Part of me thinks this could be true. The CFP can’t want 2 G5 teams in the 12 team field that would be insane. Feel like giving one G5 team was nice enough.
I am an optimistic person, but voted no. The committee is making clear with its actions that its goal is to maximize the amount of SEC teams in the playoff.
Moving Bama to #9 when there was no legitimate reason to do so is just to ensure they get in (and therefore that there are 5 SEC teams) regardless of the SEC championship outcome and to ensure that it is ND and not an SEC team that gets knocked out if BYU upsets TT.
They are flat out gaslighting us at this point. An entire group of people who can watch that hideous Iron Bowl and move Bama up a spot is not making a serious attempt at ranking teams--they are doing something else. And the whole Miami vs ND head-to-head thing is just a distraction from the fact that Oklahoma sucks and has no right to be in the playoff. They are 13 in Sagarin and SP+ and 16 in FPI, behind Vandy in all three.
We have got a lot of national media types vouching for the H2H--and openly too. Pate went scorched earth last night on it. Finebum and SAS both agreed on putting Miami of ND...how often does them agreeing ever happen. We have politicians weighing in. Wind's are at our backs boys. We absolutely have the high-ground here.
Lots of philosophical questions being thrown around about how this will affect this sport long-term. This is not a UGA vs FSU '23 similar issue. The question is literally, "with two teams, nearly identical outcomes and comparisons and common opponents and with a head-to-head result. Does the head-to-head matter?" If the answer is it does not then we are in some serious trouble as a sport. Where do you even go at that point to measure victory between two teams if their matchup doesn't matter?
One-Hundred Fifty-Four years of precedent is about to be changed by a committee led by a cuck should they forego the head-to-head. Miami haters are celebrating our snub as a win for them--but it will be short-lived. If H2H doesn't matter for us, it won't matter for them either when it is their turn--and college football will be worse for it.
We have got a lot of national media types vouching for the H2H--and openly too. Pate went scorched earth last night on it. Finebum and SAS both agreed on putting Miami of ND...how often does them agreeing ever happen. We have politicians weighing in. Wind's are at our backs boys. We absolutely have the high-ground here.
Lots of philosophical questions being thrown around about how this will affect this sport long-term. This is not a UGA vs FSU '23 similar issue. The question is literally, "with two teams, nearly identical outcomes and comparisons and common opponents and with a head-to-head result. Does the head-to-head matter?" If the answer is it does not then we are in some serious trouble as a sport. Where do you even go at that point to measure victory between two teams if their matchup doesn't matter?
One-Hundred Fifty-Four years of precedent is about to be changed by a committee led by a cuck should they forego the head-to-head. Miami haters are celebrating our snub as a win for them--but it will be short-lived. If H2H doesn't matter for us, it won't matter for them either when it is their turn--and college football will be worse for it.
There would have to be 2 G5 teams if Duke wins. One thing nobody is talking about much is that the committee slipped JMU and North Texas into the Top 25 this week. Tulane is at 20. So the AAC winner is guaranteed in the field. JMU is more than a 3 TD favorite over Troy, so odds are good they will win. So it is JMU for the final spot unless Virginia wins (which it likely will).This is what I want to believe. Josh Pate mentioned something about us rooting for Duke because he doesn’t think the CFP is going to shut out a P4 conference, especially one with a team as good as Miami and doesn’t buy the “two G5 team” possibility. Part of me thinks this could be true. The CFP can’t want 2 G5 teams in the 12 team field that would be insane. Feel like giving one G5 team was nice enough.
An offense. ND would be about a 9 point favorite on a neutral field against Oklahoma based on Sagarin. Close to a touchdown at OU. And if it happens, which is possible or maybe even likely, it will not be that close. Who would you rather have UM play?At least OU has good wins. What does ND have?
An offense. ND would be about a 9 point favorite on a neutral field against Oklahoma based on Sagarin. Close to a touchdown at OU. And if it happens, which is possible or maybe even likely, it will not be that close. Who would you rather have UM play?