Awsi Dooger
Junior
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2012
- Messages
- 2,662
I voted No. As a gambler I want to risk higher. I don't like hiring older coaches and I'd prefer somebody who will emphasize paralyzing defense. Older head coaches seldom do that, as opposed to relying on passing and offense. I've had those criteria for decades so I'm certainly not going to ignore them for one example.
I understand the recruiting angle. Fragile, IMO. Lots of reliance on one aspect as opposed to the big picture. Butch Davis has never had to recruit with this stadium, at his current age, or with so much recent negativity and fired coaches attached to the program. We'd be nuts to ignore that those aspects will be used by other programs. He also can't put kids on track scholarships anymore.
I remember a guy who was always somewhat baffled on the sideline. Instead of knowing when to go for 2 it was like an enlightenment for him when somebody else on the sideline pointed it out.
I understand the recruiting angle. Fragile, IMO. Lots of reliance on one aspect as opposed to the big picture. Butch Davis has never had to recruit with this stadium, at his current age, or with so much recent negativity and fired coaches attached to the program. We'd be nuts to ignore that those aspects will be used by other programs. He also can't put kids on track scholarships anymore.
I remember a guy who was always somewhat baffled on the sideline. Instead of knowing when to go for 2 it was like an enlightenment for him when somebody else on the sideline pointed it out.
