forums

Do we suck? I honestly can’t tell.

Advertisement
None of our games should make anyone particularly happy, but look at the record. We looked like crap but won while 2 teams above us lost. Just like every week. At some point you have to respect winning, even if it isn't pretty.
 
Not sure how we're any different than Clemson last year who seemed anything but dominant, struggled **** near every week, and even took a horrible loss to a mediocre Pitt team.

Yes, they were better than we are now, but it's an apt comparison I think.

Just win and play your best game when it counts the most.
 
supersaiyanshel said:
Not sure how we're any different than Clemson last year who seemed anything but dominant, struggled **** near every week, and even took a horrible loss to a mediocre Pitt team.

Yes, they were better than we are now, but it's an apt comparison I think.

Just win and play your best game when it counts the most.
Click to expand...

They had Watson we have Rosier.
 
The only thing we suck is the life and hope out of every team we squeak by.
 
Advertisement
supersaiyanshel said:
Not sure how we're any different than Clemson last year who seemed anything but dominant, struggled **** near every week, and even took a horrible loss to a mediocre Pitt team.

Yes, they were better than we are now, but it's an apt comparison I think.

Just win and play your best game when it counts the most.
Click to expand...

You’re not actually comparing us to last year’s Clemson national championship team with a Heisman Trophy QB?!?

Apt comparison?!? Is this real life?
 
No we dont suck. We just have unrealistic expectations. We expect Miami to dominate but we really dont have the depth, talent or experience needed to dominate yet. But while we're barely winning, other supposedly good teams are actually losing to inferior teams. Clemson has been dominant but they loss to the same Syracuse team that we beat. Oklahoma, USC, Washington St, TCU loss to inferior teams. Miami find a way to win. So we not where we want to be yet but we not bad.
 
what's obvious to me is that our offense is one dimensional and totally lacks any deception. Right is a worse OC than Coley and he was bad.
 
onplane said:
what's obvious to me is that our offense is one dimensional and totally lacks any deception. Right is a worse OC than Coley and he was bad.
Click to expand...

Once the WR catch the balls AND Rosier hits his targets AND we have a running game AND we lose I'll believe that's the problem. Until then, I'm sticking with the fact that we don't execute. Also, nobody plays like they mean it until the second half.
 
I don't think we suck but we have major issues. We don't run the ball enough, terrible in the redzone and horrific 3rd conversion rate....
 
Advertisement
drifters1234 said:
supersaiyanshel said:
Not sure how we're any different than Clemson last year who seemed anything but dominant, struggled **** near every week, and even took a horrible loss to a mediocre Pitt team.

Yes, they were better than we are now, but it's an apt comparison I think.

Just win and play your best game when it counts the most.
Click to expand...

You’re not actually comparing us to last year’s Clemson national championship team with a Heisman Trophy QB?!?

Apt comparison?!? Is this real life?
Click to expand...

Pretty sure I said "Yes, they were better" was lost. It's an apt comparison in that a team struggling all season does not mean they suck.
 
On a forum filled with a bunch of dumb posts today, this is light years ahead of the rest. At least your thought was outstanding in that regard OP.
 
Back
Top