In which role: boundary or field Safety? I feel like he can likely do a lot of the things we need on the field side, but uncertain about his range/speed. And, he'd likely head down hill well on the Boundary side, but against 4 and 5WR looks, unless Guidry switches things up a good bit from last year (which is possible), he'd end up in man coverage against a #2 WR a good bit.He's definitely gonna get significant reps. By the second half of the season he may very well be starting. Just depends how everything lines up cause Meesh being as versatile as he is,that's the only given for playing time. Harris well have to see and then obviously it's all about health. Any way it goes I can't see any path to him not having plenty of snaps
That's the thing though when I was saying not much is defined and it can go multiple ways is because like with the online. Several of our DBS are getting reps in various roles. Zaquan in particular. I see him more often than not at boundary but he's more than physical enough to play field. Safety is definitely where my concern lies for the defense. But we do have more than enough skill at the position to make it work. But it's dependent on how quickly the line gets on the same page.In which role: boundary or field Safety? I feel like he can likely do a lot of the things we need on the field side, but uncertain about his range/speed. And, he'd likely head down hill well on the Boundary side, but against 4 and 5WR looks, unless Guidry switches things up a good bit from last year (which is possible), he'd end up in man coverage against a #2 WR a good bit.
I prefer to have Powell in that man coverage role. Perhaps you've seen Zaquan's coverage skills evolve in the offseason workouts, etc.? They can also ask him to do some of the stuff James Williams did last year, and perhaps he can do it with more eye discipline and short area quickness.
@WestEndZone, any thoughts? The DB dynamic, especially with Safety skill sets, still has me concerned.
This is the thrust of my post, though. I think we’ll see a healthy amount of 4WR this year. That’s what I’d do against our defensive roster. If we do see this, you mentioned you’ve seen ZP cover underneath man routes. I haven’t, I guess. Do you see him as someone with enough quickness to do so? Do you see that immediately? This is the scenario I’ve emphasized throughout the offseason, as I think Powell would have to play there for us. At least in the near term.As for 4-5 WR sets, that is a personnel package thing, I think. No one really stays in that too long and we will be able to change personnel or play calling as needed.
It could happen. I don’t know if there is a big concern. Against 10 personnel we will probably play out of a quarters shell—I don’t think we’ll need the extra guy in the box to stop the run. Maybe I’m wrong. Patterson will thrive flat footing in a read #2/inside quarter alignment.This is the thrust of my post, though. I think we’ll see a healthy amount of 4WR this year. That’s what I’d do against our defensive roster. If we do see this, you mentioned you’ve seen ZP cover underneath man routes. I haven’t, I guess. Do you see him as someone with enough quickness to do so? Do you see that immediately? This is the scenario I’ve emphasized throughout the offseason, as I think Powell would have to play there for us. At least in the near term.