forums

Dingle and Scott....

D

daddacane

Senior
Joined
Jan 31, 2013
Messages
2,575
Wondering if it's a miss print that they have 40 times of 4.89 and 4.99...If speed is what we need at WR why are we taking two guys with abismal speed at WR?
 
Advertisement
Neither are burners. Wouldn't be surprised to see Scott land elsewhere


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Advertisement
Peter Ariz said:
Neither are burners. Wouldn't be surprised to see Scott land elsewhere


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

****..so it sounds like we could take no one from this Southridge 2017 class? Complete 180 when we thought they would be the core of our group.
 
Peter Ariz said:
Sigma_Cane_7 said:
Peter Ariz said:
Neither are burners. Wouldn't be surprised to see Scott land elsewhere


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

What would be the cause of that? Bigger targets, someone flips him?
Click to expand...

Bigger targets


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Why take the commitment then. Real possibility we could strike out at south ridge other than Gibson because of this think about it.. Slow playing ***an, dropped gamble, Thompson probably will be elsewhere, might drop Scott and Davis might be leaning elsewhere...
 
Advertisement
Sigma_Cane_7 said:
Peter Ariz said:
Sigma_Cane_7 said:
Peter Ariz said:
Neither are burners. Wouldn't be surprised to see Scott land elsewhere


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

What would be the cause of that? Bigger targets, someone flips him?
Click to expand...

Bigger targets


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Thanks. Why would we take his commitment then if we know he's a plan B take?
Click to expand...

Better than the Golden staff's formula of waiting for plan A guys, striking out on them, and then missing out on plan B prospects because of waiting too long to recruit/offer.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Sigma_Cane_7 said:
Peter Ariz said:
Sigma_Cane_7 said:
Peter Ariz said:
Neither are burners. Wouldn't be surprised to see Scott land elsewhere


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

What would be the cause of that? Bigger targets, someone flips him?
Click to expand...

Bigger targets


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Thanks. Why would we take his commitment then if we know he's a plan B take?
Click to expand...

This is the only recruiting gaffe for this staff this class IMO.

I don't get why they took Scott's commitment. Is it routine for programs to break their verbal agreement with a prospect, because it can be bad PR.

Speed isn't everything, Dingle has better size. I just don't get how you take both.
 
Better than the Golden staff's formula of waiting for plan A guys, striking out on them, and then missing out on plan B prospects because of waiting too long to recruit/offer.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

How about something in between, recruit slower, better than faster or later! kids will be ****ed if you dropped them for "someone" bigger. This just seem like has become our program over the past decade plus with south florida kids. Remember it killer B's of a DL going into their senior year, then it was the running backs (cook, Michel, and yearby) we knew we would land several of them too. Now southridge seems to be cooling off.
 
Advertisement
FyreHam said:
Sigma_Cane_7 said:
Peter Ariz said:
Sigma_Cane_7 said:
Peter Ariz said:
Neither are burners. Wouldn't be surprised to see Scott land elsewhere


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

What would be the cause of that? Bigger targets, someone flips him?
Click to expand...

Bigger targets


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Thanks. Why would we take his commitment then if we know he's a plan B take?
Click to expand...

This is the only recruiting gaffe for this staff this class IMO.

I don't get why they took Scott's commitment. Is it routine for programs to break their verbal agreement with a prospect, because it can be bad PR.

Speed isn't everything, Dingle has better size. I just don't get how you take both.
Click to expand...

PR only means anything if you're bad at winning. Saban processes dudes faster than a ninja blender and steps over convulsing bodies....nobody gives a **** if you're winning.
 
Advertisement
Camron Buckley, Evidence are some other realistic guys.
Seems like a down year for SoFla WRs.
 
Ver said:
Camron Buckley, Evidence are some other realistic guys.
Seems like a down year for SoFla WRs.
Click to expand...

It is. 2016 was important to keep all three of those guys. Jeudy will probably the only early contributor from this class.
 
Cash said:
nvlahos said:
Peter Ariz said:
Sigma_Cane_7 said:
Peter Ariz said:
Neither are burners. Wouldn't be surprised to see Scott land elsewhere


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

What would be the cause of that? Bigger targets, someone flips him?
Click to expand...

Bigger targets


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Besides Jeudy, who are the top WRs on our board?
Click to expand...

You gotta throw everything at Grimes too.
Click to expand...

And it still won't matter.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top