Did we kick a field goal on third down?

[CanesAreAble]

I don’t know if this was already discussed, but when King got injured, it was second down.

The refs called defensive holding, but it remained second down somehow.

Perry came in and ran two plays, then we kicked a FG.

Was there ever an explanation why there wasn’t an automatic first down on the holding penalty?

Were there offsetting penalties?

 

[CanesAreAble]

It was second down, than we ran two plays, than kicked a field goal. And you think it would have been a third down?

Can you read?

 

[Jaxson Villain]

And yes, there was an explanation as to why it did not become an automatic first down.

 

[CanesAreAble]

Can you math?

If you read my post, this shouldn’t be complicated.

The refs called defensive holding on 2nd down, ergo we should’ve had an automatic first down.

Kosi came in and ran two plays.

Unless I’m missing something.

 

[CanesAreAble]

And yes, there was an explanation as to why it did not become an automatic first down.

What was it?

 

[Jaxson Villain]

If you read my post, this shouldn’t be complicated.

The refs called defensive holding on 2nd down, ergo we should’ve had an automatic first down.

Kosi came in and ran two plays.

Unless I’m missing something.

Just Google “ncaa defensive holding run play”

 

[TheOriginalCane]

I don’t know if this was already discussed, but when King got injured, it was second down.

The refs called defensive holding, but it remained second down somehow.

Perry came in and ran two plays, then we kicked a FG.

Was there ever an explanation why there wasn’t an automatic first down on the holding penalty?

Were there offsetting penalties?

There is already a thread on this:

Defensive Holding penalty (the play where D'Eriq got hurt)

OK, someone brought this up on a nuked thread. When D'Eriq was injured, the defense was called for holding, yet we had to repeat second down. Apparently, the college rules differ for whether the play was a running play or a passing play (which is almost always when you see defensive holding...

www.canesinsight.com

The refs did not give the automatic first down because it was ruled to be D-Holding on a running play, not a passing play. I completely disagree with their misinterpretation, but that is the explanation.

 

[LuCane]

I don’t know if this was already discussed, but when King got injured, it was second down.

The refs called defensive holding, but it remained second down somehow.

Perry came in and ran two plays, then we kicked a FG.

Was there ever an explanation why there wasn’t an automatic first down on the holding penalty?

Were there offsetting penalties?

@TheOriginalCane gave a good analysis:

Defensive Holding penalty (the play where D'Eriq got hurt)

OK, someone brought this up on a nuked thread. When D'Eriq was injured, the defense was called for holding, yet we had to repeat second down. Apparently, the college rules differ for whether the play was a running play or a passing play (which is almost always when you see defensive holding...

www.canesinsight.com

 

[TheOriginalCane]

@TheOriginalCane gave a good analysis:

Defensive Holding penalty (the play where D'Eriq got hurt)

OK, someone brought this up on a nuked thread. When D'Eriq was injured, the defense was called for holding, yet we had to repeat second down. Apparently, the college rules differ for whether the play was a running play or a passing play (which is almost always when you see defensive holding...

www.canesinsight.com

Thank you, sir.

 

[LuCane]

There is already a thread on this:

Defensive Holding penalty (the play where D'Eriq got hurt)

OK, someone brought this up on a nuked thread. When D'Eriq was injured, the defense was called for holding, yet we had to repeat second down. Apparently, the college rules differ for whether the play was a running play or a passing play (which is almost always when you see defensive holding...

www.canesinsight.com

The refs did not give the automatic first down because it was ruled to be D-Holding on a running play, not a passing play. I completely disagree with their misinterpretation, but that is the explanation.

My bad. We must've opened a new post at the same time. Race condition of sorts.

 

[CanesAreAble]

There is already a thread on this:

Defensive Holding penalty (the play where D'Eriq got hurt)

OK, someone brought this up on a nuked thread. When D'Eriq was injured, the defense was called for holding, yet we had to repeat second down. Apparently, the college rules differ for whether the play was a running play or a passing play (which is almost always when you see defensive holding...

www.canesinsight.com

The refs did not give the automatic first down because it was ruled to be D-Holding on a running play, not a passing play. I completely disagree with their misinterpretation, but that is the explanation.

Okay, thanks.

So if King had thrown the ball away instead of scrambling, it would’ve been an automatic first down?

 

[Deleted member 26015]

A defensive holding awards you a first down when throwing a pass.

If you run, it does not.

Apparently, thats a first for me too...

 

[TheOriginalCane]

Okay, thanks.

So if King had thrown the ball away instead of scrambling, it would’ve been an automatic first down?

Essentially, yes. I mean, the refs were complete buffoons, so they might have screwed it up, but yes, that would have been the correct call IF IF IF the ball was thrown.

SUCKS.

 

[Trav]

The down and distance are always on the screen. Do you have like an old CRT 4x3 TV where the bottom of the screen is cut off or something?